A Decentralized Clinical Trial to Promote Evidence-Based Care for Underserved Patients With Neurofibromatosis 1

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorMassachusetts General Hospital

About this trial

The goal of this fully decentralized, randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of two educational interventions for individuals with Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). The primary objective of the study is to determine which intervention leads to higher rates of evidenced-based health screenings for NF1 patients in primary care settings.

Adults with NF1 and parents/guardians of children with NF1 from across the U.S. who do not go to a specialized NF clinic and who have an upcoming annual wellness visits (e.g. an annual physical, a well-child visit, etc.) scheduled with a primary care provider (PCP) are eligible to enroll in the study. To see if you might be eligible, fill out a prescreening survey here: https://redcap.link/mynfguide

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Currently lives in the United States (including Puerto Rico and other United States territories)

Has a clinical diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1

Does not attend an NF clinic within the Children's Tumor Foundation NF Clinic Network

Has an in-person, well-person visit with a primary care provider scheduled within 3 months of their consent

Disqualifiers

Only one person per household may participate in the study

Unwilling or unable to give informed consent

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Letters about NF1 Care (Content Type 1)

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive two letters about NF1 care, one for themselves and one for their primary care clinician, to read in advance of the patient's annual wellness visit

  • Letters about NF1 Care (Content Type 2)

    Other intervention

    Participants will receive two letters about NF1 care, one for themselves and one for their primary care clinician, to read in advance of the patient's annual wellness visit

Treatment groups

294 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention ArmExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Enhanced Usual Care ArmExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Receipt of Recommended NF1 Health Screenings

Number of AAP and ACMG recommended health screenings received by the person with NF1 at the annual wellness visit with their PCP, as assessed by patient/parent self-report

Time frame
2 weeks after PCP visit

Secondary outcomes

1

Patient Activation Measure®

The Patient Activation Measure will be used to assess patient's and parent's self-efficacy managing their or their child's care. The patient form has 13 items and the parent form has 10 items. The measure has scores ranging from 0-100, where higher scores indicate higher patient/parent activation (e.g. self-efficacy in managing your own or your child's healthcare).

Time frame
At baseline and 2 weeks after PCP visit
2

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey Version 4.0 (Beta): Rating of the Visit

The CAHPS® Rating of the Visit will be used to assess patient/parent satisfaction with the visit. This rating is a single item scored from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated a better visit.

Time frame
2 weeks after PCP visit
3

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey Version 4.0 (Beta): How Well Providers Communicate With Patients Subscale

The subscale will be used to assess How Well Providers Communicate With Patients. This scale will be scored from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated better communication with patients.

Time frame
2 weeks after PCP visit
4

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey Version 4.0 (Beta): Providers' Use of Information to Coordinate Patient Care Subscale

The subscale will be used to assess Providers' Use of Information to Coordinate Patient Care. This scale will be scored from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better use of information to coordinate care.

Time frame
2 weeks after PCP visit

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Lead sponsor

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Collaborator