Comparing Surgical and Endovascular Arteriovenous Fistula Creation

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorUniversity of California, Los Angeles

About this trial

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who use hemodialysis to filter their blood require vascular access for the dialysis machine; the most common type of vascular access is called an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The AVF is a direct connect between an artery and vein.

Until recently, AVFs were only created through surgery that requires general anesthesia and opening up the skin. Now there are 2 FDA-approved devices designed to create AVFs using endovascular techniques (endoAVF), which means a device that goes through the skin instead of opening the skin up. Also patients are not required to be under general anesthesia, they can receive local anesthesia instead. Due to the relatively new approval of these devices, there is not a randomized study to compare the results of endoAVF versus surgAVF.

This study is a pilot study for an eventually larger scale study to compare the results of endoAVF versus surgAVF. The study aims to determine what the proportion of patients seeking hemodialysis access could qualify for receiving either an endoAVF , surgAVF, or both. Patients who are screened for hemodialysis access must undergo a duplex ultrasound of the blood vessels in the arm to confirm correct sizing. If participants qualify for both procedures they will be randomized to either endoAVF or surgAVF and will track the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of each procedure. Our pilot study hopes to enroll 90 participants. Those outcomes will inform a larger scale study. If the potential participant chooses to abstain from participation in the randomized trial, preferring to decide the method of AVF creation, we will offer to them a chance to join an endoAVF/surgAVF registry that will track the clinical outcomes of the procedure via medical record monitoring.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

ESKD patients aged ≥ 18 who have chosen hemodialysis as their renal replacement option.

Ability to give consent to participate in a research study.

Upper arm vein diameter of ≥ 2.0 mm.

Confirmed radial artery-adjacent vein proximity ≤ 1.5 mm measured lumen edge-to-lumen edge as determined by preprocedural ultrasound and confirmed pre-procedurally.

Disqualifiers

People under the age of 18.

Inability to understand the consent process and/or give consent.

Upper arm vein diameter less than 2.0 mm making them unsuitable to receive an surgAVF AND endoAVF.

Patients who are deemed by the surgeon to be anatomic candidates for a forearm vascular access, and the surgeon and the patient determine that a forearm access is the optimal access for the patient, in order to preserve more proximal anatomic sites for future accesses.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • endoAVF

    Device

    The device will be used according to manufactures instructions and medical facilities standard of care. EndoAVF has a high likelihood of requiring additional procedures that would not have been required if they had undergone surgAVF.

  • surgAVF

    Procedure/Surgery

    The surgAAVF procedure will be done according to the medical facilities standard of care. SurgAVF can also require additional procedures to help with the fistula being useable.

Treatment groups

90 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: surgAVFActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: endoAVFActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Physiologically mature fistula

flow ≥ 500 ml/min and internal diameter \>0.5 cm

Time frame
6 months postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

1

clinically mature

cannulate with 2 dialysis needles for 75% of dialysis sessions within a 4-week period and achieve the prescribed dialysis

Time frame
6 months
2

primary patency

Interval from time of access creation until any intervention to maintain or reestablish patency, access thrombosis, or end of study period, whichever comes first

Time frame
6 months
3

secondary patency

Interval from the time of access creation until access abandonment, including intervening interventions

Time frame
6 months
4

functional patency

Interval from time of access first use and access abandonment, including intervening interventions

Time frame
6 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of California, Los Angeles

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Collaborator