Comparison of Gluteal Muscle Activation and Core Strengthening in Dead Butt Syndrome Syndrome

ConditionSyndrome
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-55
SponsorRiphah International University

About this trial

The study design would be a Randomized Controlled Trial.This study would include a total 40 participants. 20 participants in each group. Sample size is obtained through G-power. The study duration will be 12 months after the approval from the research board. Non-probability convenience sampling will be used. Randomization will be done through sealed envelope method. The study will be conducted from Quaid-e-Azam Hospital Rawalpindi and Margalla Rehabilitation Centre.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Symptoms persisting for more than 6 weeks (subacute or chronic cases).

Self-reported dull ache, discomfort, or tightness in the gluteal region worsened with prolonged sitting or walking.

Positive Trendelenburg Test

≤ 4/5 on the standard MRC grading scale

Disqualifiers

Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant during the study period.

Diagnosed hip labral tears, piriformis syndrome, or sciatica unrelated to gluteal amnesia.

Degenerative or neurological conditions such as osteoarthritis, multiple sclerosis, stroke, or spinal cord injury.

History of significant spinal trauma or surgery in the past 12 months.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Group A: Gluteal Muscle Activation

    Other intervention

    Gluteal Activation focuses on "waking up" and isolating the gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus to ensure they fire properly, often using low-load, high-control movements.

  • Group B: Gluteal Muscle Activation and Core stregthening exercises

    Other intervention

    Gluteal Activation focuses on "waking up" and isolating the gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus to ensure they fire properly, often using low-load, high-control movements.Core Strengthening focuses on stabilizing the spine and pelvis by targeting the abdominals, back, and deep pelvic muscles.

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Group A: Gluteal ActivationExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Active comparatorActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)

The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) is a shortened, 11-item version of the original 17-item TSK questionnaire used to assess fear of movement, or kinesiophobia, in individuals with chronic pain or other conditions involving movement limitations

Time frame
4 weeks
2

Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)

The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is used to assess "patients' initial function, ongoing progress, and outcome" for a variety of disorders affecting the lower extremities. LEFS is a self-reported survey. The LEFS total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating better functional ability.

Time frame
4 weeks
3

Numeric Pain Rating Scale

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a tool used to measure the intensity of pain. It's a unidimensional scale, typically an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable. Patients verbally or numerically indicate the level of pain they are experiencing.

Time frame
4 Weeks
4

The Trendelenburg test

The Trendelenburg test is a physical examination used to assess the strength of hip abductor muscles, specifically the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus, or to check for the competency of venous valves in the legs. A positive Trendelenburg sign, indicated by a drop of the pelvis on the unsupported side during a single-leg stance, suggests weakness in the hip abductors.

Time frame
4 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.