Digitalization of Maxillo-mandibular Relation for Arches With Occlusal Support Loss

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-65
SponsorKıvanç Akça

About this trial

Accurate recording of the intermaxillary relationship is crucial for achieving successful restorative outcomes.

In cases of occlusal support loss, determining and recording the intermaxillary relationship becomes more complex.

This study aims to compare the occlusal compatibility of restorations fabricated using either an intraoral scanner or a jaw motion tracking and analysis device for recording the intermaxillary relationship in patients with occlusal support loss.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Voluntary participation after reading and understanding the informed consent form.

Age between 18 and 65 years with completed growth and development.

Healthy dental and periodontal condition.

Presence of bilateral edentulism in the maxillary posterior region leading to occlusal support loss, requiring fixed prosthetic treatment.

Disqualifiers

Refusal to voluntarily participate after reading the informed consent form.

General health condition unsuitable for prosthetic treatment.

Use of removable prostheses in the mandibular arch.

Presence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction, orofacial pain, or acute oral disease.

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Fixed prosthesis with bimanual CR and intraoral scan

    Procedure/Surgery

    Tooth-supported fixed prostheses were fabricated using centric relation records obtained by two different methods: 1. Bimanual manipulation technique, with jaw relation records captured using an intraoral scanner. 2. Neuromuscular deprogramming technique, with jaw relation records obtained using a jaw movement tracking and analysis device.

Treatment groups

14 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Determination of Intermaxillary Relationship in Patients with Posterior Support LossExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Adjustment Time for Restoration

The time required to adjust the restoration will be recorded in minutes and scored on a 0-4 scale as follows: 0 (≤1 min), 1 (1-5 min), 2 (5-10 min), 3 (10-15 min), 4 (≥15 min).

Time frame
1 year
2

Adjusted Surface Area of the Restoration

The surface area requiring adjustment will be measured in square millimeters (mm²) using ImageJ software and scored from 0 to 4: 0 (≤1 mm²), 1 (1-6 mm²), 2 (6-10 mm²), 3 (10-15 mm²), 4 (≥15 mm²).

Time frame
1 year
3

Number of Articulation Paper Uses

The number of articulation paper uses will be counted and scored from 0 to 4 as follows: 0 (2-4 uses), 1 (5-7), 2 (8-10), 3 (10-13), 4 (≥14 uses).

Time frame
1 year
4

Composite Clinical Success Score of the Restoration

The clinical success of each restoration will be evaluated using a composite score derived from three parameters: Adjustment Time, Adjusted Surface Area,Number of Articulation Paper Uses. Each parameter is scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score between 0 and 12. Based on the total score, restorations will be categorized as follows: Excellent (Score 0-1): Restoration has a clinically optimal fit. Occlusal contacts are properly and evenly distributed. Successful (Score 2-4): Restoration shows good clinical fit with minor occlusal adjustments. Moderate (Score 5-7): Restoration is clinically acceptable with occlusal adjustments. Weak (Score 8-10): Restoration has issues in clinical fit and required major occlusal adjustments. Unsuccessful (Score 11-12): Clinical fit is unacceptable. Adjustments caused morphological distortion or resulted in occlusal gaps. Restoration must be replaced. This composite score will serve as the primary measure of overall clinical success.

Time frame
1 year

Secondary outcomes

1

Occlusal Comfort Evaluated Using Visual Analog Scale

Secondary outcome will assess patient-reported occlusal comfort following the clinical application of the restoration. Occlusal comfort will be measured using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no comfort and 10 indicates maximum comfort. Patients will rate their experience immediately after the restoration trial.

Time frame
1 year

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Kıvanç Akça

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University

Sponsor institution

Hacettepe University

Collaborator