Double Duty Interventions and Its Impact on Double Burden of Malnutrition in Children Under Five Years

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-5
SponsorDebre Berhan University

About this trial

Background: Double burden of malnutrition is an emerging public health problem among children under-five years due to the inevitable consequences of nutritional transition. Addressing these two contrasting forms of malnutrition (undernutrition and overnutrition) simultaneously brings an enormous challenge to the food and nutrition policies of developing countries like Ethiopia. Children under five ages are more vulnerable to DBM, especially during the first year of their life due to high growth and inadequate diet. Hence, there has been a paradigm shift in thinking to reduce its effect on the health of children. However, interventions that are used to address these different kinds of malnutrition are implemented through different governance and still, they are isolated and disintegrated each other. Therefore, double-duty interventions can tackle the risk of both nutritional problems simultaneously in an integrated approach through nutrition behavior change communication.

Objective: Therefore, the main aim of this pilot study is to assess the effect of selected double-duty interventions on the double burden of malnutrition among children under five years in Debre Berhan City, Ethiopia.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

who attend the intervention

Disqualifiers

who are not attended the intervention

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • double duty intervention packages

    Behavioral

    The intervention employed in this study will serve as double-duty interventions. The WHO policy short report from 2017 and Hawkes et al2020 .'s were amended and used as the basis for the DDIs packages. The main components of the intervention packages are the promotion of a minimum level of dietary diversity, avoiding unwarranted harm from high-energy foods, and controlling market foods from the perspective of the consumer. The following central criteria will be used to evaluate the study's intervention packages.

Treatment groups

456 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Intervention armExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Controll armNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Proportion of Double burden of malnutrition

Number of Mother of children who received double-duty interventions to reduce the DBM of children

Time frame
10 months
2

Proportion of dietary diversity score

Number of Mother of children who received double-duty interventions to improve the dietary diversity score of children.

Time frame
10 months
3

Proportion of low frequency of morbidity

Number of Mother of children who received double-duty interventions on the frequency of morbidity in children.

Time frame
10 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Proportions of mothers with good maternal nutritional status

Proportions of mothers with good maternal nutritional status through questionnaire

Time frame
10 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.