Efficacy of Personalized Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol Based on Functional Reserve to Enhance Upper Limb Function in Subacute Stroke Patients

ConditionStroke
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age19+
SponsorSamsung Medical Center

About this trial

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy based on the functional reserve of each hemiplegic stroke patient in subacute phase, compared to conventional low-frequency rTMS therapy on contralateral M1. Investigators hypothesized that the functional reserve of each hemiplegic stroke patient will be different, and therefore an appropriate simulating target for rTMS therapy is needed. In addition, this approach could be more effective compared to conventional protocols applied to stroke patients regardless of their severity, predicted mechanism of motor function recovery, or functional reserves.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

hemiplegic stroke patients in the subacute phase (7 days to 3 months from the onset) who are currently hospitalized,

FMA score of the upper extremity ≤42,

adequate language and cognitive function to perform at least a 1-step obey-command,

pre-stroke functional level of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤1,

Disqualifiers

those with contraindications to rTMS, such as epilepsy, implanted metal objects in the head, or a history of craniotomy,

those with progressive of hemodynamically unstable medical conditions,

those with coexisting neurological conditions, such as spinal cord injury or Parkinson's disease,

those with major psychiatric disorders, such as major depression, schizophrenia, or dementia,

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • High-Frequency1

    Device

    rTMS intervention: 20 sessions of 10-Hz rTMS at 90% resting motor threshold (RMT), 50 pulses per session with a 25-second interval between sessions, totaling 1,000 pulses. rTMS target: ipsilateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

  • cTBS1

    Device

    rTMS intervention: 40 seconds of cTBS at 70% RMT, totaling 600 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

  • High-Frequency2

    Device

    rTMS intervention: 20 sessions of 10-Hz rTMS at 90% RMT, 50 pulses per session with a 25-second interval between sessions, totaling 1,000 pulses. rTMS target: ipsilateral premotor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

  • cTBS2

    Device

    rTMS intervention: 40 seconds of cTBS at 70% RMT, totaling 600 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

  • High-Frequency3

    Device

    rTMS intervention: 20 sessions of 10-Hz rTMS at 90% RMT, 50 pulses per session with a 25-second interval between sessions, totaling 1,000 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

  • cTBS3

    Device

    rTMS intervention: 40 seconds of cTBS at 70% RMT, totaling 600 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 6 treatment groups

6

Treatment groups

See each treatment group below.

Group A: High-Frequency1Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: cTBS1Active comparator 1 intervention
Group C: High-Frequency2Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group D: cTBS2Active comparator 1 intervention
Group E: High-Frequency3Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group F: cTBS3Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score of Upper Extremity (FMA-UL)

Measurement for motor function of upper limb. Minimum: 0, Maximum: 66. Higher score means a better

Time frame
From baseline T0 to Post-intervention T2 (2 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

1

Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score of Upper Extremity (FMA-UL)

Measurement for motor function of upper limb. Minimum: 0, Maximum: 66. Higher score means a better

Time frame
From baseline T0 to During-intervention T1 (1 week)
2

Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score of Upper Extremity (FMA-UL)

Measurement for motor function of upper limb. Minimum: 0, Maximum: 66. Higher score means a better

Time frame
From baseline T0 to Follow-up T3 (2 months)
3

Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score (FMA)

Measurement for motor function of all limbs. Minimum:0, Maximum: 100. Higher score means a better

Time frame
From baseline T0 to During-intervention T1 (1 week)
4

Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score (FMA)

Measurement for motor function of all limbs. Minimum:0, Maximum: 100. Higher score means a better

Time frame
From baseline T0 to Post-intervention T2 (2 weeks)

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Samsung Medical Center

Lead sponsor

National Research Foundation of Korea

Collaborator

Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea

Collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

Collaborator

Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital

Collaborator

Saint Vincent's Hospital, Korea

Collaborator

Severance Hospital

Collaborator

Kumoh National Institute of Technology

Collaborator

NEUROPHET

Collaborator