Evaluation of AI Cost Prediction Model to Enroll Patients in Complex Care Management Program

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of California, Los Angeles

About this trial

Currently, UCLA Health (specifically the Office of Population Health and Accountable Care, or OPHAC) runs a complex care management program called Proactive Care (goal is to reduce care utilization by providing personalized care navigation/case management). Every month, an AI Population Risk tool runs to identify around 250 of the 480,000 or so UCLA primary care patients, and RNs contact these 250 patients to enroll in Proactive Care. Starting in December 2024, OPHAC launched a new method of enrolling UCLA's Medicare Advantage (MA) patients into Proactive Care: an AI Cost Prediction model. The idea is the same-- the top 250 highest predicted cost patients will be enrolled in Proactive Care. The investigators will evaluate this model and subsequent enrollment into the program by randomizing the waitlist of MA patients waiting to enroll in Proactive Care, thereby creating a control group. The top 500 highest predicted cost patients will be identified each month, and following a 1:1 randomization, 250 will be contacted for enrollment and the rest will be put on a wait-list control group for 10 months unless otherwise requested by their provider to be enrolled in the Proactive Care program earlier.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

At least 18 years of age

Enrolled in a UCLA Managed Care Plan

Cost prediction model identifies patient as having high predicted costs over the next 12 months

Disqualifiers

Currently enrolled in any UCLA care management program

Enrolled in any UCLA care management program in the last 12 months

Already has an active referral to a care management program

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Complex care management program

    Behavioral

    Intensive outpatient care management program that includes contact from nurses and case managers to help coordinate care, detect clinical red flags, and reduce overall unplanned acute care utilization.

Treatment groups

5,000 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Complex Care ManagementActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Care as usualNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) at 120 days from randomization

The sum of the number of days that a patient is not hospitalized under inpatient or observation status, and alive, out of a maximum of 120 days post-randomization.

Time frame
120 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

1

Days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) at 30 days from randomization

The sum of the number of days that a patient is not hospitalized under inpatient or observation status, and alive, out of a maximum of 30 days post-randomization.

Time frame
30 days after randomization
2

Days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) at 90 days from randomization

The sum of the number of days that a patient is not hospitalized under inpatient or observation status, and alive, out of a maximum of 90 days post-randomization.

Time frame
90 days after randomization
3

Days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) at 10 months from randomization

The sum of the number of days that a patient is not hospitalized under inpatient or observation status, and alive, out of a maximum of 300 days post-randomization.

Time frame
10 months post-randomization
4

Total healthcare expenditures at 10 months from randomization

The sum of all healthcare expenditures (inpatient, outpatient, prescription, etc.) as determined by claims data.

Time frame
10 months post-randomization

Other outcomes

1

Cost prediction model performance over 22 months, as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

Observed healthcare expenditures for each month's control cohort will be measured over the subsequent 12 months after randomization (ie, 10 months of enrollment + 12 months of follow-up= 22 months), and compared to model-predicted healthcare expenditures. This analysis will only be conducted in the control group, as the intervention is designed to affect healthcare expenditures in the treatment group.

Time frame
12 months after the final cohort enrolls
2

Protocol fidelity over the 10 months of enrollment

The sum of two metrics: * The proportion of patients randomized to the intervention who enroll in the complex care management program * The proportion of patients randomized to the control who do not enroll in the complex care management program.

Time frame
14 months post-randomization
3

Avoidable hospitalizations

The number of hospitalizations that could have been avoided through timely access to ambulatory care

Time frame
10 months post-randomization
4

Avoidable emergency department visits

The number of emergency department visits that could have been avoided through timely access to ambulatory care

Time frame
10 months post-randomization

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.