Feasibility, Safety, and Preliminary Efficacy of Median Nerve Stimulation for Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Traumatic Brain Injury

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-64
SponsorBeijing Tiantan Hospital

About this trial

Currently, the treatment of cognitive dysfunction after acute TBI remains a challenge, and novel therapeutic methods are urgently needed. Median nerve stimulation (MNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique and recently has shown positive effects in awaking coma of acute brain injury. It has been shown to improve cognition in healthy volunteers and may be a potential therapeutic approach for cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute TBI. Therefore, the main purpose of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of MNS for cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute TBI.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Aged 18-64 years.

Admitted within 3 days post-injury with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9-12 at admission, accompanied by imaging abnormalities.

Presence of cognitive dysfunction assessed within 1-week after injury, with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≤26.

Pre-injury Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score = 0 as reported by family members.

Disqualifiers

Requirement for emergent neurosurgical intervention during treatment including surgery, intracranial pressure monitoring device placement, or drainage catheter insertion.

Unstable vital signs or hemodynamics, or presence of unstable cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, or hematopoietic system disorders.

Pre-existing central nervous system conditions causing cognitive decline: traumatic brain injury, intracranial infection, brain tumor, epilepsy, stroke, neurodegenerative diseases, carbon monoxide poisoning, and alcohol abuse.

Inability to complete assessments or examinations due to severe visual or auditory impairment, severe psychiatric or behavioral disorders, MRI contraindications, and MEG intolerance.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Median nerve stimulation

    Device

    Participants will receive right median nerve stimulation therapy (right median nerve electrical stimulator, XCH-B1, Jiangxi Nuocheng Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd.). Both frequency of 40 Hz and pulse width of 300 µs are fixed and applied within a 20-s on/40-s off protocol. Stimulation will be administered for 8 hours per day over a 2-week period.

  • Sham

    Drug

    The participants in the sham stimulation group will receive no electrical stimulation (0 mA) via an activated stimulator, with all other device settings and procedures identical to those used in the active stimulation group.

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Median nerve stimulation groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Sham groupSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Change in global cognitive function assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)

The MMSE will be used to evaluate global cognitive function. Assessments will be conducted by two trained occupational researchers who are blinded to group allocation and not involved in the intervention.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 7 after injury), 1 month after injury, and 3 months after injury.

Secondary outcomes

1

Global cognitive function (MoCA)

Global cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a 30-point screening tool evaluating multiple cognitive domains including attention, memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial ability. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance, and a score below 26 suggests cognitive impairment.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 7 after injury), 1 month after injury, and 3 months after injury.
2

Verbal fluency

Verbal fluency will be assessed using the Verbal Fluency Test, in which participants are asked to generate as many words as possible within 1 minute. The test evaluates language production and executive control, with higher word counts indicating better performance.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 7 after injury), 1 month after injury, and 3 months after injury.
3

Language function

Language ability will be assessed using the Boston Naming Test, which requires participants to name a series of visually presented objects. Higher scores reflect better confrontation naming ability and language function.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 7 after injury), 1 month after injury, and 3 months after injury.
4

Visuospatial function

Visuospatial ability will be assessed using the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT), which evaluates visuospatial construction and visual memory through figure copying and recall tasks. Higher scores indicate better visuospatial performance.

Time frame
Baseline (Day 7 after injury), 1 month after injury, and 3 months after injury.

Other outcomes

1

Feasibility outcomes

Feasibility will be evaluated by enrollment rate, recruitment rate, adherence rate (proportion of completed scheduled stimulation hours), and retention rate (completion of all outcome assessments).

Time frame
From baseline (Day 7 after injury) to 3 months after injury.
2

Safety outcomes

Adverse events related to the intervention (e.g., skin pain, uncomfortable cutaneous sensations, dizziness, abnormal blood pressure, or heart rhythm disturbances) will be recorded. Side effects will be monitored using a 10-item Likert-scale questionnaire (score range: 1 = absent to 5 = severe).

Time frame
From baseline (Day 7 after injury) to 3 months after injury.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.