About this trial
This study has the goal to determine the best method of respiratory support following extubation after cardiac surgery (CS). After cardiac surgery for Congenital Heart Disease (CHD), patients remain intubated until the cardiac team determines it is safe for the patient to undergo a trial of extubation. Two common methods of respiratory support following extubation are High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV). There is currently a gap in data comparing High Flow Nasal Cannula and Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in infants (age 0-1) in regard to extubation failure and overall outcomes.
This study will monitor the health outcomes of 200 infants (0 - 1 year) with CHD following cardiac surgery in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (CHOA). This will be done by assigning the respiratory support method each child will receive following extubation after cardiac surgery. Health outcomes will be monitored until discharge or until the second instance of extubation failure.
Both study arms are standard-of-care respiratory support methods in the CHOA CICU. The investigators aim to determine which of these two methods has fewer risk factors when used with infants.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
All patients admitted to the CICU following cardiac surgery for CHD who are </= 1 year of age and/or weight </= 10 kg
Disqualifiers
Patients who remain intubated for >/= 4 weeks
Patients who have a tracheostomy prior to their cardiac surgery
Patient enrolled in a competing research study
Patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support preoperatively
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
High Flow Nasal Canula following extubation
Procedure/SurgeryParticipants in this group will be randomized to receive High Flow Nasal Cannula support after extubation. The patient will be clinically monitored, and respiratory support will be escalated per a specific flow sheet. The patient will remain on this assigned air support method until they are either removed entirely from air support or require re-intubation.
Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation following extubation
Procedure/SurgeryParticipants in this group will be randomized to receive NIPPV respiratory support following extubation. The patient will be clinically monitored, and respiratory support will be escalated per a specific flow sheet. The patient will remain on this assigned air support method until they are either removed entirely from air support or require re-intubation.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
To compare the effectiveness in avoiding extubation failures of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) vs Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Rates of extubation failures (EF) will be compared among both groups. Data will be collected from the hospital electronic medical record system.
Secondary outcomes
Patient's clinical breathing status at discharge
The research team will review the hospital's electronic medical record and check the patient's breathing status (oxygen saturation on room air) after the patient's hospital discharge
Difference of patients' clinical hemodynamical status at discharge
The research team will review the hospital's electronic medical record and check the patient's vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) to determine the clinical hemodynamical status at discharge.
Length of hospital stay difference between treatment groups
The research team will review the hospital's electronic medical records after the patient's hospital discharge. The length of hospital stay (days) will be calculated from time of hospital admission until discharge
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.