Hormonal Control of Energy and Macronutrient Intake in Obesity (MEMORY)

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-45
SponsorSteno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

About this trial

The overall aim of the MEMORY study is to examine the concept of 'food memory' - how specific macronutrient compositions influence subsequent food preference and intake, and whether this differs across the BMI range from normal weight to obesity.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age 18-45 years

For women: Regular menstruation

BMI-range 18.5-39.9 kg/m²

Disqualifiers

Not able or willing to eat or drink the test meals because of e.g., allergy or intolerance

Daily smoking

For women: Pregnancy / planned pregnancy (within the study period) / lactating

Self-reported history of an eating disorder

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • High protein liquid test meal

    Other intervention

    High protein liquid test meal consisting of whey protein, water and sugar-free coadial mix for flavour.

  • High carbohydrate liquid test meal

    Other intervention

    High carbohydrate liquid test meal consisting of sucrose, water and sugar-free coadial mix for flavour.

Treatment groups

45 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Protein liquid test mealExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Carbohydrate liquid test mealExperimental treatment 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Difference in energy intake from sweet tasting carbohydrates.

The difference in energy intake (E%) from sweet tasting carbohydrates during the ad libitum buffet in response to the high carbohydrate vs. high protein isocaloric liquid test meals.

Time frame
Measured after meal consumption at t=150 min

Secondary outcomes

1

Difference in self-reported energy intake

Difference in 24-h self-reported energy intake (KJ) from carbohydrate, protein, and fat and total energy intake in response to the high carbohydrate vs. high protein isocaloric liquid meals.

Time frame
Measured 24-hours after test visits
2

Difference in energy intake from fat

Difference in energy intake (KJ) from protein during the ad libitum buffet in response to the high carbohydrate vs. high protein isocaloric liquid meals.

Time frame
Measured after meal consumption at t=150 min
3

Difference in energy intake from sweet tasting carbohydrates.

The difference in energy intake (KJ) from sweet tasting carbohydrates during the ad libitum buffet in response to the high carbohydrate vs. high protein isocaloric liquid test meals.

Time frame
Measured after meal consumption at t=150 min
4

Difference in energy intake from protein

Difference in energy intake (KJ) from protein during the ad libitum buffet in response to the high carbohydrate vs. high protein isocaloric liquid meals.

Time frame
Measured after meal consumption at t=150 min

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen

Lead sponsor

Novo Nordisk A/S

Collaborator

University of Leeds

Collaborator

University of Copenhagen

Collaborator