Impact of Anesthesia Alarm Volume on Mental Workload in Surgical Trainees

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorInstitut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

About this trial

Noise in hospital environments, particularly in operating rooms, poses challenges to both patient comfort and healthcare professionals' performance. Among the sources of noise, anesthesia monitoring alarms are essential for patient safety, yet no clear guidelines exist regarding their optimal sound level. Excessive alarm volume may increase distraction and cognitive load, especially for surgical trainees, potentially impairing their focus and performance during procedures. This randomized pilot interventional study aims to evaluate the impact of anesthesia alarm sound intensity on the mental workload of surgical trainees performing simulated surgeries. Participants will be randomly assigned to conditions with either an optimized alarm volume or a higher standard volume during simulated tasks. Cognitive load will be assessed using objective physiological measures such as heart rate variability and pupillometry, as well as subjective evaluations with tools like the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX scales. The primary goal is to determine whether an optimized alarm sound level can reduce cognitive strain without compromising vigilance required for patient safety. Findings from this study are expected to provide evidence-based recommendations for auditory ergonomics in operating rooms, ultimately improving working conditions for surgical teams and enhancing both training and patient safety.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Surgical residents or experienced surgeons;

Surgeons with normal hearing;

Surgeons capable of performing surgical sutures (regardless of skill level);

Surgeons able and willing to follow all study procedures according to the protocol;

Disqualifiers

Surgeons undergoing beta-blocker treatment;

Surgeons with known cardiac pathology;

Surgeons who do not consent to participate in the study;

Surgeons with known hearing problems;

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • effects of sound

    Other intervention

    The surgical trainees will perform four 15-minute surgical sequences in a controlled environment, with varying sound levels (64, 67, 73, and 75 dB(A)) randomized across the sequences to assess the surgeons' responses.

Treatment groups

26 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: surgical trainees groupOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Impact of the optimal sound intensity level during a surgical procedure

Assessment of heart and respiratory rate variability parameters

Time frame
From inclusion (baseline) to 6 months post-inclusion

Secondary outcomes

1

Interference with the surgical procedure

Measurement using the SURG-TLX (Surgical Task Load Index) questionnaire

Time frame
From inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedure
2

Mental workload of the surgical trainee

Measurement using the SURG-TLX scale.

Time frame
From inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedure

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: