IMRT Versus IMPT With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Anal Canal Cancer

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorTata Memorial Centre

About this trial

The standard practice in management of carcinoma of anal canal is to treat patients with radiotherapy using the IMRT technique along with chemotherapy. It is known that while IMRT has reduced treatment related side effects as compared to the older radiation techniques, reducing these side effects further still remains a major challenge.

These side-effects include gastrointestinal (diarrhea, altered bowel habits, weight loss, bleeding, obstruction), genitourinary (difficulties in passing urine, passing blood in urine, difficulty in holding urine) and hematologic toxicities (anemia, low platelet count and increased predisposition to infections).

Proton therapy (IMPT) is a form of radiation treatment in which high doses can be delivered within the tumor while the surrounding normal tissues receive a lesser radiation dose. It is believed that these physical properties of proton therapy may help reduce the side effects of treatment.

Patients will be randomly assigned to either receive IMRT or IMPT based treatment so as to see whether it is possible to reduce the acute treatment related toxicities. In this study, there is a 66.7% chance that the patient will get IMPT based treatment, which may be able to reduce the toxicities.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Age > 18 and < 80 years of age

Histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal or distal rectum

The patients may have TNM stage T1-2 N+M0 or T3-4 N0-1c M0 (UICC 8th edition)

Involvement of lower para-aortic lymph nodes (till renal hilum) as the only site of disease extension on PET CECT may also be included as they receive radical chemoradiation as standard treatment.

Disqualifiers

Two or more synchronous primary cancers.

When prosthetic materials (e.g. hip prostheses) are present close to the target volume, it must be considered if this may introduce uncertainties in dose calculations, which may affect the treatment planning process.

Ulcerative colitis or any other histologically confirmed inflammatory bowel disease.

Poor reliability for follow-up and treatment completion.

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)

    Radiation

    Proton therapy is a form of radiation treatment in which high doses can be delivered within the tumour while relatively sparing the surrounding normal tissues. This may help further reduce the side-effects of radiation treatment observed with IMRT.

  • IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy)

    Radiation

    The standard management of carcinoma of the anal canal is radiotherapy using the IMRT technique along with concurrent chemotherapy. The use of IMRT has reduced the treatment-related side-effects as compared to older radiation techniques. However, further reducing these side effects poses a major challenge.

Treatment groups

108 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Radical CTRT with IMPT (Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Radical CTRT with IMRT (Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy)Active comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Grade 3 or higher acute toxicity

The highest GI/GU/Hematological toxicity will be captured per patient will be documented using CTCAE v5.0 and the percentage of patients with more than Grade 3 toxicity will be added in each arm and compared proportionately.

Time frame
Upto 6 months post-last cytotoxic therapy.

Secondary outcomes

1

Local Failure

Local control will be computed as the time between randomization and local relapse or progression, Measurable persistent disease after six months from the completion of chemoradiation therapy will be considered a local failure.

Time frame
5 years since randomization
2

Regional Failure

From randomisation till a situation in which a patient who initially had no signs of disease in the pelvic and groin nodes later displays disease in these nodes after receiving treatment or reappearance of the disease in these nodes after they were initially cleared or the presence of persistent nodal disease for more than six months after completing the treatment.

Time frame
5 years since randomization
3

Distant Relapse

The rate of relapse of the tumor outside the pelvic region.

Time frame
5 years since randomization
4

Colostomy-free Survival

From the the time of randomization till the necessity for colostomy is clinically warranted or death due to any cause.

Time frame
5 years since randomization

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.