About this trial
Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common knee condition causing pain and dysfunction. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two physical therapy treatments for PFPS: Mulligan mobilization with movement technique versus phonophoresis with chitosan gel.
Forty-five participants with patellofemoral pain syndrome will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) Mulligan technique group, (2) Phonophoresis with chitosan gel group, or (3) Control group receiving standard physical therapy exercises. Each group will receive treatment 3 times per week for 4 weeks.
The researchers want to determine which treatment is more effective in improving neuromuscular control, reducing pain, and improving function in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Participants will be assessed before and after the treatment period.
This study may help physical therapists and healthcare providers choose the most effective treatment approach for patients with patellofemoral pain.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Insidious onset of anterior knee pain
Retro patellar or peripatellar pain
Pain duration more than four weeks (chronic/subacute)
Pain severity ≥ 3/10 on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Disqualifiers
Traumatic injury (e.g., dislocation, fracture, ligament or meniscus pathology)
Inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, gout)
Prior knee surgery
Current use of NSAIDs or corticosteroids
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Mulligan technique
- Phonophoresis with Chitosan Gel
- Standard Physical Therapy Exercise Program
Treatment groups
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.