About this trial
This is an open-label, randomized study of BMS-986489 (atigotatug + nivolumab fixed-dose combination) vs durvalumab in limited-stage (LS)-small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) participants.
The main goals of this study are to:
* Evaluate the efficacy of BMS-986489 vs durvalumab * Evaluate the safety profile of BMS-986489
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
At least 18 years-of-age at the time of signature of the Informed Consent Form (ICF)
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1 (Appendix A)
Histologically or cytologically confirmed pulmonary SCLC, evaluable by RECIST v1.1
Limited-stage (LS) disease as determined by positron emission tomography (PET) scan prior to initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy
Disqualifiers
Small-cell cancer not pulmonary in origin
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
ES-SCLC
Mixed SCLC and NSCLC histologic features; diagnosis of NSCLC; or EGFR-activating, mutation-positive NSCLC that has transformed to SCLC
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
BMS-986489
DrugBMS-986489 (fixed dose combination of atigotatug + nivolumab) will be administered as an intravenous infusion to be given once every 4 weeks for up to 2 years.
Durvalumab
DrugDurvalumab will be administered as a fixed dose intravenous infusion to be given once every 4 weeks for up to 2 years.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Evaluate the efficacy of BMS-986489 vs durvalumab by Overall Survival (OS).
Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death due to any cause.
Secondary outcomes
Evaluate the efficacy of BMS-986489 vs durvalumab by Progression Free Survival (PFS).
Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from start of study treatment to the date of an event, defined as the first documented radiological progression or death due to any cause.
Evaluate the efficacy of BMS-986489 vs durvalumab Objective Response Rate (ORR).
Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with BOR of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1.
Evaluate the efficacy of BMS-986489 vs durvalumab by Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR).
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) is defined as the proportion of participants with BOR of CR or PR, or participants with SD lasting at least 180 days (i.e., ≥6 months) according to RECIST v1.1.
Evaluate the efficacy of BMS-986489 vs durvalumab by Disease Control Rate (DCR).
Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the proportion of participants with BOR of CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST v1.1
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
SCRI Development Innovations, LLC
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Collaborator