Radiotherapy With Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel-cetuximab in HNSCC: ERCC1 Biomarker Enrichment and Interaction Design

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 2
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorChristopher Wilke

About this trial

The goal of this clinical research study is to learn which chemotherapy combination may be more effective in treating locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The side effects of these combinations will also be studied.

This study treatment consists of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy. For study chemotherapy, patients will be randomized between cisplatin or the combination of docetaxel and cetuximab. Subjects will be stratified depending on HPV status and the presence of ERCC-1 \[4F9\] in the tumor prior to randomization. The study will evaluate cisplatin vs. docetaxel-cetuximab in the overall population, and test which radiation and chemotherapy combination works best in relationship to how much ERCC-1 \[4F9\] is expressed in a tumor.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Pathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, or poorly differentiated carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx with no evidence of distant metastasis. Biopsy sampling of primary tumor with pathology report documenting diagnostic tissue type is required.

Patients must have stage III, IVa or IVb disease as determined by imaging studies and complete head and neck exam. Staging evaluation should be in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition.

Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma may have p16(+) or p16(-) disease; in these patients, p16 status must be known prior to randomization. Assessment of p16 status may occur locally or centrally. Note: The definition of p16(+) disease is diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining in ≥ 70% of tumor cells.

Patients must be untreated with curative-intent surgery for current diagnosis of Stage III, IVa, or IVb disease. Diagnostic biopsy of primary tumor and/or nodal sites is permitted.

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Cisplatin

    Drug

    Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly x 7

  • IMRT

    Radiation

    IMRT: once daily, M-F, 7 weeks (70 Gy)

  • Docetaxel

    Drug

    Docetaxel 15 mg/m2 weekly x 7

  • Cetuximab

    Drug

    Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 load, one week prior to IMRT Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly x 7

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Cisplatin-IMRTActive comparator 2 interventions
Group B: Docetaxel-Cetuximab-IMRTActive comparator 3 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Time To Progression (TTP)

Time To Progression is the duration of time from date of study entry until the first appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression in patients with increased tumoral ERCC1 expression. Progression is defined per RECIST v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).

Time frame
Up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

1

Time to progression (TTP)

Time To Progression is the duration of time from date of study entry until the appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression in patients with decreased tumoral ERCC1 expression. Progression is defined per RECIST v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).

Time frame
Up to 5 years
2

Local Control Rate (LRC)

Proportions of patients with a tumor volume equal to or less than the tumor volume at start of radiotherapy.

Time frame
Up to 5 years
3

Rate of distant metastases

Proportion of patients with new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression in patients with increased tumoral ERCC1 expression. Progression is defined per RECIST v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).

Time frame
Up to 5 years
4

Validation candidate cutpoint

Validation candidate cutpoint for decreased/normal vs. increased ERCC1 \[4F9\] expression in patients treated with cisplatin-IMRT. ERCC1 \[4F9\] expression is measured.

Time frame
Up to 5 years

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Christopher Wilke

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh

Sponsor institution