Evaluation of Efficacy of Skål Pro Powder on Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phasePhase 4
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorEP Plus Group Sdn Bhd

About this trial

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Skal Pro in alleviating symptoms, enhancing stool consistency, improving quality of life, and addressing psychological distress in individuals diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), as compared to those who receive no intervention.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

IBS diagnosed using the Rome IV criteria

Age above 18 years old and any gender

Any subtypes of IBS (diarrhea, constipation or mixed)

Disqualifiers

Presence of red flag symptoms (weight loss, anemia, night symptoms, abdominal mass, strong family history of cancer)

Was prescribed antibiotic (s) within the past one month

Medical conditions that contraindicate probiotic use including severe sepsis and pregnancy

Presence of bowel malignancy

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Skal Pro

    Combination product

    One sachet Skal Pro per day containing Lactobacillus plantarum 299v 1x10\^10 CFU and GOS

  • Placebo

    Other intervention

    One sachet per day identical in shape, size, colour, packaging and taste to the Skal Pro sachet

Treatment groups

60 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Skal ProExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: PlaceboPlacebo comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Improving the severity of symptoms in individuals with IBS, assessed by IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBSSSS)

IBSSS questionnaire contains five questions that measures, on a 100-point visual analogue scale (VAS), the severity of abdominal pain, the frequency of abdominal pain, the severity of abdominal distension, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and interference with quality of life (QOL). All five components contribute to the scores equally, yielding a theoretically range of 0 - 500, with a higher score indicating worse condition. The Malay version questionnaire will be used.

Time frame
Assessed at baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 4.

Secondary outcomes

1

Change in stool consistency (Bristol Stool Scale), assessed by daily stool diary

Daily diary of stool consistency of each bowel movement based on Bristol Stool Scale (Type 1-7), from type 1-2 = separate hard lump stool, type 3-4= ideal stool, type 5-7 =loose stool

Time frame
Assessed daily from baseline to Week 4.
2

Change in stool frequency and satisfaction after passing stool, assessed by daily stool diary

Daily diary of number of bowel movements.

Time frame
Assessed daily from baseline to Week 4.
3

Change in abdominal bloating, assessed by Bloating Severity Questionnaire (BSQ)

Originally developed by Thiwan et al., this research group then translated and validated the BSQ in the Malay language (BSQ-M) \[13\]. There are 2 sub-scales, the 6-item Sev-Gen (Severity-General) and 5-item Sev-24 (Severity-24 hour) with responses in seven-point Likert scale on different degree of severity (from 1 = never to 7=always). For this study, only the Sev-Gen will be used.

Time frame
Assessed at baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 4.
4

Improvement in Quality of Life, assessed by EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire

The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) was introduced by the EuroQol Group in 2009, and consist of 2 sections, 1) the EQ-5D descriptive system and 2) the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health the participant can imagine' and 'The worst health the participant can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement. The Malay version questionnaire will be used.

Time frame
Assessed at baseline, Week 1, Week 2, and Week 4.

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.