About this trial
The objectives of this study are to determine the sensory-mechanical responses to Eucapneic Voluntary Hyperventilation (EVH) and Mannitol in individuals with cough variant asthma (CVA) and methacholine-induced cough with normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) and compare these responses to a control group of healthy individuals without asthma or chronic cough.
We hypothesize:
1. EVH and Mannitol cause dyspnea, cough, small airway obstruction with resultant dynamic hyperinflation, gas trapping and autoPEEP in individuals with CVA and COUGH, but not healthy controls. 2. The sensory-mechanical responses to both hyperosmolar challenges (EVH and Mannitol) are comparable within groups (CVA, COUGH and healthy controls).
Eligibility criteria
This trial accepts healthy volunteersQualifiers
CVA: chronic cough (≥8 weeks) is the sole or predominant symptom and positive methacholine challenge (PC20 ≤ 16 mg/mL) and history of cough responding to specific asthma treatment (such as inhaled steroid or 1 week trial of bronchodilator);
Methacholine-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity: chronic cough (≥8 weeks) is the sole or predominant symptom and negative methacholine challenges (PC20 > 16 mg/mL).
Individuals aged 18-65 years of age with no history of asthma or chronic cough.
Disqualifiers
an exacerbation necessitating a change in medication, emergency department visit or hospitalizations within the previous 4 weeks
inability to perform acceptable spirometry
medical contraindications to methacholine challenge testing
smoking history in excess of 10 pack years Note: Previous treatment with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids is not an exclusion criterion; medication use will be recorded and examined in the analysis.
Trial design
Crossover
Treatments tested in this trial
Methacholine (MCh) Challenge Testing
DrugVisit 1: Informed consent, Baseline screening and pulmonary function tests and Low-dose methacholine challenge testing using partial and full flow-volume loops.
Eucapneic Voluntary Hyperventilation (EVH)
Diagnostic testVisit 2 or 3: Will be conducted in random order and subjects will perform one of the two challenge tests at either visit.
Mannitol Inhalation Kit
DrugVisit 2 or 3: Will be conducted in random order and subjects will perform one of the two challenge tests at either visit.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Mid expiratory flows
The bronchodilating effect of a DI will be examined using responses to the challenge testing (Visit 2/3) in these subgroups by comparing the mid-expiratory flow difference between the partial (PEF) and full maximal flow-volume (MEF) loops at 40% above Residual Volume (RV) from the forced vital capacity (FVC) (PEF40 and MEF40 respectively) at provocative dose of 4.5% saline causing a 20% decline in FEV1 (PD20 (HS)) and provocative minute ventilation causing a 20% decline in FEV1 (PC20 (EVH)) with that recorded at baseline.
Secondary outcomes
Respiratory System Reactance (X5)
Single IOS will measure peripheral airway function using respiratory system reactance (X5) and peripheral resistance (R5-R20) and central resistance (R20) will be used as an index of airway narrowing.
Peripheral Resistance (R5-R20)
Single IOS will measure peripheral airway function using respiratory system reactance (X5) and peripheral resistance (R5-R20) and central resistance (R20) will be used as an index of airway narrowing.
Central Airway Resistance
Single IOS will measure peripheral airway function using respiratory system reactance (X5) and peripheral resistance (R5-R20) and central resistance (R20) will be used as an index of airway narrowing.
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
As an index of airway closure.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Dr. Diane Lougheed
Lead sponsor
Queen's University
Sponsor institution