[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-study-detail:100613510":3},{"organization":4,"armGroups":7,"interventions":7,"overallOfficials":7,"centralContacts":7,"locations":7,"responsibleParty":8,"collaborators":10,"id":13,"slug":7,"hasResults":14,"nctId":15,"briefTitle":16,"officialTitle":17,"acronym":18,"eligibilityCriteria":19,"healthyVolunteers":14,"sex":20,"minAge":21,"maxAge":7,"enrollmentInfo":22,"targetDuration":7,"studyType":25,"phases":7,"briefSummary":26,"conditions":27,"keywords":7,"overallStatus":29,"whyStopped":7,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":30,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":31,"startDateStruct":34,"completionDateStruct":36,"leadSponsor":38,"locationsCount":7},{"fullName":5,"class":6},"Philips Clinical & Medical Affairs Global","INDUSTRY",null,{"type":9,"investigatorFullName":7,"investigatorTitle":7,"investigatorAffiliation":7,"oldNameTitle":7,"oldOrganization":7},"SPONSOR",[11],{"name":12,"class":6},"Philips Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.","100613510",false,"NCT07267533","Precise 3D Surview","Precise 3D Surview Clinical Study","3D Surview","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subjects scanned by CT 5300 (K232491) and Incisive CT (K212441) according to the department standard of care clinical protocols.\n* Subjects age is over eighteen (18) years1.\n* Patients scanned in supine orientation.\n* Non-contrast CT scan\n* CT scan with standard resolution\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Subjects age is under or equal 18 years old\n* Patients are not scanned in supine orientation.\n* Contrast-enhanced CT scans.\n* CT scans with high resolution\n* Scans that are not completed due to technical difficulties","ALL","18 Years",{"count":23,"type":24},274,"ESTIMATED","OBSERVATIONAL","The purpose of the study is to assess the performance of Precise 3D Surview on CT 5300 and Incisive CT Scanners as compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists.\n\n* To evaluate the acceptance rate of the Auto 3D Planning Box compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists.\n* To evaluate the acceptance rate of the Auto Suggestion for Locator compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists.\n* To evaluate the acceptance rate of the Auto Planning for Truncated Anatomies (lung and liver) compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists.\n* To evaluate the acceptance rate of Auto Planning and Symmetry Correction for Tilted Head compared with manual annotation by experienced CT technologists.",[28],"Computed Tomography","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-12-04",{"date":32,"type":33},"2025-12-05","ACTUAL",{"date":35,"type":24},"2026-01-31",{"date":37,"type":24},"2026-10-01",{"name":5,"class":6}]