Prediction of Inspiratory Effort Response to High PEEP in Patients Recovering From ARDS

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorSanatorio Anchorena San Martin

About this trial

Spontaneous breathing during the transition from controlled to assisted ventilation in ARDS may be harmful, as high respiratory drive can generate large transpulmonary pressure swings and worsen lung injury. Higher PEEP may mitigate this by reducing inspiratory effort and lung stress, but patient response is variable and difficult to predict. While improved lung compliance appears to mediate the protective effects of PEEP, its bedside assessment is complex. Preclinical data suggest that changes in compliance are inversely reflected by changes in respiratory rate, but this relationship and its clinical utility in ARDS patients remain unclear.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Need of invasive mechanical ventilation

Patients who had fulfill ARDS criteria based on Berlin definition during any time of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Patient ventilated in pressure support ventilation.

Time of invasive ventilation expected to be longer than 24 hs after the day of enrollment.

Disqualifiers

Neuromuscular diseases (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Duchenne Erb)

previous diagnosis of chronic obstructed pulmonary disease

not resolved pneumothorax

bronchopleural fistula

Trial population

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated using an endotracheal tube admitted to Anchorena San Martin intensive care unit who are ventilated in pressure support ventilation.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Positive end expiratory pressure

    Other intervention

    Initially, the patients will be ventilated using pressure support ventilation with an inspiratory pressure adjusted to achieve 6 - 8 ml/kg of PBW with a minimal esophageal pressure swing of 5 cmH2O and a PEEP of 5 cmH2O. After 5 minutes, we will collect basic and advanced respiratory monitoring, including esophageal pressure and transpulmonary pressure swings. The same procedure will be carried out with 10 and 15 cmH2O of PEEP. Inspiratory pressure will be kept constant throughout the protocol.

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Lung compliance response

changes in lung compliance from one PEEP level to the subsequent higher level, expressed in percentage of change

Time frame
10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

1

Esophageal pressure swing

Esophageal pressure swing will be calculated as the difference between end expiration and end inspiration esophageal pressure during the las 30-60 seconds of each PEEP condition evaluated

Time frame
10 minutes
2

Dynamic transpulmonary pressure swing

Dynamic transpulmonary pressure swing will be calculated as the difference between end expiration and end inspiration dynamic transpulmonary pressure during the las 30-60 seconds of each PEEP condition evaluated

Time frame
10 minutes
3

Respiratory rate response

changes in respiratory rate from one PEEP level to the subsequent higher level, expressed in percentage of change

Time frame
10 minutes

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.