Prospective and Comparative Evaluation of a Medical Device Composed of a Perineal Probe Connected to a Mobile Application in the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence.

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-60
SponsorNantes University Hospital

About this trial

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects around 40% of women and has a major impact on quality of life. The gold standard for the treatment of SUI is pelvicfloor rehabilitation, but this presents constraints in terms of availability of healthcare professionals, as well as organization and travel for patients. Innovative devices offer self-training exercises for the pelvicfloor, thus promoting motivation and adherence to treatment. The hypothesis of this study is to prove that the use of a pelvicfloor medical device combined with 2 rehabilitation sessions is not inferior to pelvic-perineal rehabilitation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients with moderate, severe or very severe stress urinary incontinence or mixed stress urinary incontinence (according to ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire score: moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21))

Patient aged between 18 and 60

Patient with a quality of life score measured with the I-QoL questionnaire less than or equal to 70 (score measured from 0 to 100, with poor quality of life: 0-35; average quality of life: 36-70; good quality of life: 71-100)

Not to have given birth in the last 6 months (to avoid post-partum physiological recovery)

Disqualifiers

Patients with mild stress urinary incontinence or mixed stress urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI SF score: mild (1-5))

Patient with a quality of life score above 70 (according to the I-QoL questionnaire: good quality of life: 71-100)

Patient undergoing other pelvic-perineal rehabilitation during the study period

Patients with neurological disease or congenital malformation, surgically or medically treated urinary incontinence or prolapse, perineal hypoesthesia or local conditions prohibiting the use of an intravaginal catheter

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • EMY

    Device

    Patients in the "intervention" group (rehabilitation with the EMY medical device) will undergo 2 rehabilitation sessions with a physiotherapist trained in pelviperineology between M0 and M2. The aim of these sessions will be to learn proper perineal contraction and combat the deficits identified during the physiotherapist's assessment. They will have to perform pelvic-perineal re-education exercises with the EMY device on 3 different days a week, for 15 minutes, over a period of 3 months. Then, for a further 3 months, their program can be modified for free, on-demand use (e.g. 2 x 10 minutes per week). After the main criterion at M6, they will be free to modify their rehabilitation program in the application according to their symptoms, and follow their program until the end of the study

Treatment groups

138 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: EMY (connected biofeedback medical device)Experimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: standardNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Urinary symptoms using the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire

The non-inferiority of 2 sessions of pelvic floor rehabilitation associated with the use of the EMY medical device compared with 15 sessions of pelvic floor rehabilitation (gold standard) on the urinary symptoms score at 6 months will be assessed using the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire.

Time frame
6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Quality of life using the I-QoL questionnaire

changes in quality of life will be studied using the validated I - QoL questionnaire

Time frame
0 month, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
2

Urinary symptoms using the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire

changes in urinary symptoms will be studied using the validated ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire

Time frame
0 month, 1 month, 3 months, 12 months
3

Cost-utility ratio using the EQ-5D questionnaire

The cost/utility ratio will be studied using the cost/QALY ratio. The costs will relate to the consumption of reimbursed or non-reimbursed care (medical and paramedical consultations, hospitalization, drug treatment, absorbent pads, pessaries, etc.). QALYs will be estimated on the basis of responses to the validated EQ-5D 5L questionnaire.

Time frame
0 month, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
4

Qualitative component

the qualitative component will consist of questionnaires evaluating : * consumption of care at M0, M1, M3, M6 and M12 ; * ease of access to care at M1 ; * treatment satisfaction with the standardized PGI-I questionnaire and the question "do you recommend your treatment to a friend ?" at M3; * treatment adherence using a diary and a Likert scale between M0 and M3

Time frame
1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Nantes University Hospital

Lead sponsor

FIZIMED Company

Collaborator