About this trial
The present study aims to compare the efficacy (menstrual blood loss, pain, quality of life) and the safety (complications, recovery) of each conservative intervention (RFA, UAE) versus hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-related abnormal uterine bleeding, up to 2 years
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Premenopausal women aged 30 to 50 years
Women who had at least 3 prior months failed medical therapy, or a contraindication to medical therapy, or refused medical therapy for adenomyosis-related AUB
Symptomatic pure internal adenomyosis or dominant adenomyosis (with less than 5 concurrent uterine fibroids type 3-7 < 5 cm) confirmed by MRI (< 6 months) according to ESHRE criteria
AUB defined as a PBAC score >100 at baseline
Disqualifiers
Uterine cavity abnormality or obstruction confirmed via imaging modalities or hysteroscopy
Deep infiltrating posterior subperitoneal endometriosis involving contiguous digestive tract structures
Uterine malignancy within the last five years
Secreting ovarian tumor
Trial design
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Radiofrequency endometrial ablation
Procedure/SurgeryRadiofrequency endometrial ablation
Uterine artery embolization
Procedure/SurgeryUterine artery embolization
Hysterectomy
Procedure/SurgeryHysterectomy
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
proportion of 2-year clinical success of the intervention
proportion of 2-year clinical success of the intervention, defined as a significant reduction in menstrual blood loss (Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart-PBAC, score \<100). Women undergoing RFA or UAE and requiring subsequent hysterectomy for persistent AUB before 2 years will be considered as clinical failure.
Secondary outcomes
Proportion clinical success of the intervention
Proportion clinical success of the intervention, defined as a significant reduction in menstrual blood loss (PBAC score \<100)
Proportion in self-reported amenorrhea
Proportion in self-reported amenorrhea (PBAC score = 0),
Mean changes in severity of dysmenorrhea between UAE and RFA
Mean changes in severity of dysmenorrhea between Uterine Artery Embolisation-UAE and Radiofrequency endometrial ablation-RFA) (visual analogue scale rating from 0 to 10),
Mean changes in pelvic pain
Mean changes in pelvic pain (visual analogue scale rating from 0-no pain to 10-extreme pain);
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead sponsor
French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
Collaborator