Safety and Efficacy of DCB Therapy for de Novo Lesions Under the Guidance of QFR in CHD Patients (UNIQUE-DCB-I Study )

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-90
SponsorNanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

About this trial

Since Gruntzig successfully performed percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty in 1977, percutaneous coronary intervention has developed rapidly. From bare metal stents to drug-eluting stents (DES), the symptoms and prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) have been greatly improved. Although DES has reduced the probability of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and thrombosis compared with BMS since its clinical application, it can not completely solve this problem. Even if the new generation of DES requires revascularization, the incidence of ISR is still as high as 5%-10%. DES treatment is associated with delayed endothelial healing, late acquired poor stent adherence and new atherosclerosis, which lead to late ISR and thrombosis. In addition, DES is still not ideal for the treatment of small vessel disease, diffuse long lesion and bifurcation lesion. Therefore, drug coated balloon (DCB) has attracted people's attention. Balloon-loaded antiproliferative drugs can fully release the drugs to the vascular wall during balloon dilation, which can inhibit the restenosis process from the beginning of injury, and show good efficacy and safety in some specific lesions. Many clinical studies have shown that DCB has good efficacy and safety in some specific lesions (ISR, small vessel disease, bifurcation disease, in situ lesion). Especially in the treatment of ISR, researchers believe that its efficacy is not inferior to DES, and it has the advantage of non-metal residues.

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is the second generation FFR detection method based on angiographic images. The diagnostic accuracy of QFR 0.80 for myocardial ischemic stenosis was 92.7%. Compared with QCA, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of QFR were also significantly better than those of QCA. The latest FAVOR II results also confirm that QFR is more sensitive and specific in diagnosing myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis than QCA, and confirm the feasibility of using QFR online in catheter lab to evaluate the functional significance of coronary artery critical lesions. However, there is no report on the treatment of de novo lesions in patients with coronary heart disease by DCB under the guidance of QFR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug balloon therapy for de novo lesions in patients with CHD under the guidance of QFR compared with DES implantation.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

QFR less than 0.8, dissection above type B and thrombosis formation after pre-dilation of coronary artery lesions

Severe congestive heart failure [LVEF <30% or NYHA( New York Heart Association) III/IV)]

Severe valvular heart disease

Life expectancy no more than 1 year or factors causing difficulties in clinical follow up

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • drug coated balloon

    Device

    Balloon/vessel diameter ratio 0.8-1.0, 8-12 ATM (atmosphere), lasting for \>30 seconds

Treatment groups

220 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: drug coated balloonExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: drug eluted stent implantationNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

The incidence rate of late lumen loss after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with CHD

The incidence rate of late lumen loss between DCB treated group and DES treated group evaluated by quantitative coronary analysis in patients with CHD

Time frame
Follow-up coronary angiography at 12 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

1

The incidence rate of device-related ischemic events

The incidence rate of device-related ischemic events including cardiovascular death, target vessel related myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven revascularization between DCB treated group and DES treated group

Time frame
Clinical follow up at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12 months after the procedure
2

The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events

The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events including all myocardial infarction , any revascularization and all-cause death between DCB treated group and DES treated group

Time frame
Clinical follow up at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12 months after the operation

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: