About this trial
This study planned to review patients admitted to three ICU wards at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between 2017 and 2020. It focused on adult patients who had undergone craniotomy and stayed in the ICU for more than 24 hours. Researchers intended to collect patient information, surgery details, complications, and outcomes from medical records. They also planned to gather routine scoring data used at the hospital and double-check its accuracy. Patients would be divided into two groups based on whether they survived or not, and the ability of different scoring systems to predict outcomes would be analyzed. Additionally, the study aimed to group patients by the type of surgery and assess how well the scoring systems predicted outcomes for each group.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Patients admitted to the ICU wards between 2017 and 2020
Patients underwent craniotomy
Patientshad an ICU stay of more than 24 hours
Disqualifiers
Pregnant or lactating women
Patients enrolled in other clinical studies
Trial population
Patients admitted to the ICU wards between 2017 and 2020 would be screened, and those who underwent craniotomy and had an ICU stay of more than 24 hours were eligible for inclusion. For patients with multiple ICU admissions during a single hospitalization, only the first admission was included. Pregnant or lactating women, as well as patients enrolled in other clinical studies, would be excluded.
Trial design
Cohort
Retrospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Not listed
Trial groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
predictive value of different scoring systems
We would evaluate the predictive value of different scoring systems for in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients following craniotomy.
Locations
1Map coordinates are unavailable for these locations. Locations are shown below instead.
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.