Supermarket Labelling and Taxation Study

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Liverpool

About this trial

Participants will be assigned to one of four conditions: (i) nutrient warning labelling and no taxation, (ii) nutrient warning labelling and taxation, (iii) current traffic light labelling and taxation or (iv) a control condition (current traffic light labelling and no taxation). Participants will complete a food ordering task using a simulated online supermarket resembling a major UK retailer (Tesco), before purchasing their selected items for delivery/collection via the retailer. Food choices will be recorded, and participants will self-report intake of purchased food items.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Are a UK resident

Are aged 18 years and above

Are fluent in English

Have access to a laptop/desktop computer with internet access

Disqualifiers

None

Trial design

Design model

Factorial

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Labelling

    Behavioral

    Participants are shown food products displaying front-of pack nutrition labels (nutrient warning labels on products high in calories, saturated fat, salt, and/or sugar/traffic light labels) during a hypothetical food choice task.

  • Taxation

    Behavioral

    Food prices displayed in the hypothetical food choice task include a 20% added tax on products high in calories, saturated fat, salt, and/or sugar.

Treatment groups

600 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groups
Group A: Nutrient warning label + no taxExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Nutrient warning label + taxExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group C: Traffic light label + taxExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Group D: Traffic light label + no taxActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Nutritional quality of food order

The nutritional quality of the participant's full food order will be calculated using mean-weighted UK Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM) scores (32). NPM scores are calculated by subtracting the total value of positive nutrients (fruit, vegetables \& nuts, fibre, protein) from the total value of negative nutrients (calories, saturated fat, sugar, salt). Lower scores indicate better nutritional quality. To account for multiple items being selected, we will calculate a mean NPM score, weighted by the energy content of individual food items. This will be done using the 'weighted.mean' function in R (33) grouped by participant so the weights are specific to individual orders.

Time frame
Survey 1, immediately after the intervention.
2

Likelihood of purchasing a less healthy option

Any participants who select a less healthy item (high in at least one nutrient/energy) as part of their meal will be coded as 1, and participants who have only selected options that are not 'high in' will be coded as 0.

Time frame
Survey 1, immediately after the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

1

Number of additional items purchased

Determined based on the total number of additional items (other than the main ready meal) selected in the food choice task. Participants may choose fewer items in response to labelling/taxation.

Time frame
Survey 1, immediately after the intervention.
2

Total energy and other nutrient intake

Determined based on the total calorie, saturated fat, salt, and sugar content of all items in the Tesco order and an estimation of the proportion of each item that was consumed. Participants will take a photograph of each ordered food item before (i.e., when it is plated) and after consumption. The researcher will use the photographs to estimate the percentage consumed. Participants will also be asked whether they shared any of their meal with someone else, and if so, to estimate the percentage shared. Energy and nutrients consumed will then be calculated by multiplying the calorie/nutrient content of each item by the percentage that was consumed (considering any sharing), and adding this together across all items to calculate total energy/nutrients consumed. All percentage estimates will be independently verified by a second researcher.

Time frame
Survey 2, administered the morning after the Tesco order is consumed. Measured between 24 hours and one week post-intervention, depending on the scheduling of the order.

Other outcomes

1

Pre-meal energy and nutrient intake

In the follow-up survey, participants will complete a dietary recall questionnaire (Intake24). They will be asked to provide as much detail as possible on what they ate for breakfast and lunch on the same day that they consume their Tesco order. We anticipate that participants may compensate for their order by consuming less at prior mealtimes (or, conversely, they may consume less of their order is they consumed more at prior mealtimes). Intake24 will then produce estimates for total energy, saturated fat, salt, and sugar consumed.

Time frame
Survey 2, administered the morning after the Tesco order is consumed. Measured between 24 hours and one week post-intervention, depending on the scheduling of the order.
2

Label awareness

All participants will be asked "Did you notice any nutrition labels on the items when making your initial food choices?" (yes/no). If \[yes\], "What did the label(s) look like?" Response options (label name and an image of the label): Nutrient warnings, Traffic lights, NutriScore, Keyhole, Health Star Rating.

Time frame
Survey 1, immediately after the intervention.
3

Price awareness

All participants will be asked "Did you think about the price of the items when making your initial food choices?" (yes/no).

Time frame
Survey 1, immediately after the intervention.
4

Policy support

All participants will be asked (i) "If the UK Government introduced a policy that required all packaged foods high in calories, saturated fat, salt, and/or sugar to display nutrient warning labels, how would you feel?", (ii) "If the UK Government introduced a policy that required all packaged foods high in calories, saturated fat, salt, and/or sugar to be taxed so that they are 20% more expensive, how would you feel?" and (iii) "If the UK Government introduced a policy that required all packaged foods high in calories, saturated fat, salt, and/or sugar to be taxed so that they are 10% more expensive, how would you feel?" Likert scale ranging from 1-5 anchored by "Strongly oppose" and "Strongly support". The order of presentation for these questions will be randomised, and only one question will be displayed at a time.

Time frame
Survey 1, immediately after the intervention.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

University of Liverpool

Lead sponsor

Medical Research Council

Collaborator