TACE With Thermosensitive Nanogel Versus Embosphere for HCC

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
SponsorZhongda Hospital

About this trial

To verify the safety and efficacy of TACE withThermosensitive Nanogel Embolic Agent for HCC.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Chinese Liver Cancer Staging Scheme, stage IIb-Illa, as well as those with stage Ia-Ila HCC, unsuitable or unwilling to undergo surgical resection, transplantation, or ablation;

Liver function status: Child-Pugh A or B

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score: 0-2 points;

With at least one measurable, unembolized liver tumor lesion (1-10 cm) ;

Disqualifiers

The target lesion has been embolized before or require combined with other treatment(s);

Diffuse or with extrahepatic metastasis;

Coagulation dysfunction (PT prolonged beyond the upper limit of normal for 3 seconds);

Severe renal dysfunctions (creatinine clearance rate <30 ml/min);

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Thermosensitive Nanogel Embolic Agent

    Device

    Thermosensitive Nanogel Embolic Agent

Treatment groups

188 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: TACE with Thermosensitive Nanogel Embolic AgentExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: TACE with Embosphere MicrospheresActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Disease control rate (DCR)

Probability of target lesion control, evaluated by the investigator and independent image review committee respectively (mRECIST).

Time frame
One month after the last TACE

Secondary outcomes

1

Success rate of target lesion embolization

Success rate of target lesion embolization, evaluated by the investigator and independent image review committee respectively.

Time frame
One month after the last TACE
2

Objective response rate (ORR)

Objective response rate of target lesions, evaluated by the investigator and independent image review committee respectively (mRECIST).

Time frame
One month after the last TACE treatment
3

Disease control rate (DCR)

Probability of target lesion control, evaluated by the investigator and independent image review committee respectively (mRECIST).

Time frame
Three and six months after the first TACE
4

Equipment performance evaluation

(Intraoperative imaging ability, microcatheter delivery capacity) evaluated by the investigator.

Time frame
One month after the first TACE

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.