Testing Scalable Caregiver Interventions for Autism

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age2-8
SponsorIndiana University

About this trial

Autism spectrum disorder affects 1-2% of children worldwide, yet access to quality care remains limited, especially in underserved communities. Families face systemic barriers such as workforce shortages, high caregiver stress, and a lack of culturally appropriate services.

To address these gaps, researchers developed a group-based caregiver training program to improve caregiver well-being and child communication and behavior. Successfully piloted in rural U.S. communities and western Kenya through the AMPATH Program, the intervention showed promising results in reducing caregiver stress and autism severity.

Building on this success, a new study will evaluate two delivery models-professionally-led and peer-led-using a rigorous effectiveness-implementation trial. The project applies a reciprocal innovation approach, using insights from Kenya to inform U.S. strategies for scaling community-based autism support.

The long-term goal is to reduce disparities in autism care by creating scalable, low-cost, caregiver-driven models. A Community Advisory Panel will guide the research to ensure relevance and impact. This initiative represents a transformative step toward equitable autism services across global and U.S. settings.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Caregiver is willing to participate

Caregiver speaks either Swahili or English

Child is between 2 and 8 years of age

Child presents with concerns suggestive of autism

Disqualifiers

The caregiver declines to participate

The child has significant vision or hearing impairment

The child is not primarily cared for by the enrolled caregiver

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Professionally-facilitated groups

    Behavioral

    A group-based caregiver ASD intervention will be delivered through two distinct implementation strategies led by trained therapists or teachers using a structured 10-week in-person curriculum at the MTRH campus and virtually in the US.

  • Peer-facilitated groups

    Behavioral

    A group-based caregiver ASD intervention will be delivered through two distinct implementation strategies led by trained caregivers of children with ASD who deliver the same core curriculum with flexibility in timing and location, provided that all content is completed within four months.

Treatment groups

320 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups
Group A: Professional-led Caregiver GroupsExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Peer-facilitated Caregiver GroupsExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group C: Waitlist controlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Family Burden and Stress

Change in caregiver-reported burden and stress levels from baseline to 3 months, measured using the Caregiver Self-Assessment Questionnaire developed by the American Medical Association. This 18-item tool includes 16 yes/no items assessing emotional and physical strain, one item rating stress on a scale from 1 (no stress) to 10 (high stress), and one item comparing current health to health one year ago. Higher scores indicate greater caregiver burden and stress.

Time frame
Baseline and 3 months
2

Autism Impact Measure (AIM)

Change in caregiver-reported communication and symbolic behavior from baseline to 3 months, measured using the Autism Impact Measure (AIM), which integrates domains from the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scale (CSBS). The AIM is a validated caregiver-report tool assessing autism-related behaviors across five domains, including communication and social reciprocity. The CSBS is a norm-referenced, standardized instrument that evaluates early communication development through 22 rating scales grouped into seven clusters: communicative functions, gestural and vocal means, verbal means, reciprocity, social-affective signaling, and symbolic behavior. Higher AIM scores indicate greater autism-related impact.

Time frame
Baseline and 3 months

Secondary outcomes

1

Quality of Life in Caregivers

Change in caregiver-reported quality of life from baseline to 3 months, measured using the Quality of Life - Family Version instrument developed by Betty Ferrell, PhD. This 37-item ordinal scale assesses quality of life across four domains for family members caring for a patient. Each item is rated from 0 (worst outcome) to 10 (best outcome), with several items reverse-scored. Subscale scores are calculated by averaging items within each domain. Higher overall scores indicate better caregiver quality of life.

Time frame
Baseline and 3 months
2

Quality of Life in Children

Change in caregiver-reported quality of life for children from baseline to 3 months, measured using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales. This 23-item instrument assesses physical, emotional, social, and school functioning across four multidimensional scales and three summary scores. It is developmentally appropriate for ages 2-18 and includes both child self-report (ages 5-18) and parent proxy-report (ages 2-18). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

Time frame
Baseline and 3 months
3

Parenting Stress Index

Change in parenting stress from baseline to 3 months, measured using the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF). The PSI-SF total score ranges from 36 to 180, with higher scores indicating greater parenting stress and a worse outcome. Each of the 36 items is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and the measure includes three subscales: Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child.

Time frame
Baseline and 3 months
4

Depressive Symptoms in Caregivers

Change in caregiver depressive symptoms from baseline to 3 months, measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression and a worse outcome. Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day).

Time frame
Baseline and 3 months

Other outcomes

1

Acceptability of Intervention

Assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) and items aligned with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). The AIM is a 4-item scale rated from 1 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"), total score range 4-20; higher scores indicate greater acceptability. Supplementary qualitative interviews will be coded using a deductive framework based on CFIR and Proctor's IOF to explore perceived acceptability and inform program adaptation.

Time frame
Post-intervention (6 months)
2

Feasibility of Intervention - Quantitative Assessment

Feasibility of the caregiver autism intervention, assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The FIM is a validated 4-item scale designed to assess the extent to which an intervention can be successfully used or carried out within a given setting. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"), yielding a total score range of 4 to 20. Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility and a better outcome.

Time frame
Post-intervention (6 months)
3

Feasibility of Intervention - Qualitative Assessment

Feasibility of the caregiver autism intervention, assessed through semi-structured qualitative interviews with caregivers and facilitators. Transcripts will be coded using a deductive codebook aligned with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and constructs from Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Framework (IOF). Thematic analysis will identify perceived acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, reach, barriers, facilitators, and recommended refinements. Findings will be summarized using a joint diagram supported by illustrative quotes.

Time frame
Post-intervention (6 months)
4

Fidelity of Intervention Delivery

Fidelity of intervention delivery assessed through audio-recorded sessions scored using a standardized fidelity rubric. The rubric evaluates facilitator adherence to core curriculum components, delivery quality, and responsiveness. Fidelity metrics are informed by prior implementation of the Pepea Pamoja and Takia programs. Scores will be aggregated across sessions to produce a mean fidelity score per facilitator. Curriculum adaptations will be documented, and facilitator training will include competency checklists, booster trainings, and structured feedback meetings to support fidelity.

Time frame
10 weeks

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Indiana University

Lead sponsor

Moi University

Collaborator

University of Virginia

Collaborator

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: