The Application of "HUAXI Hole 1" in Reverse-sequence Endoscopic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy With Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexFemale
Age18-70
SponsorDu Zhenggui

About this trial

This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. It will prospectively compare outcomes between patients undergoing reverse-sequence endoscopic NSM (R-E-NSM) with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction (DIBR) with the "HUAXI Hole 1" versus without the "HUAXI Hole 1". The study aims to evaluate differences in operative efficiency, surgical safety, postoperative aesthetics, and oncological safety between the two groups.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Female patients aged 18-70 years (inclusive18 and 70 years);

Patients eligible for unilateral or bilateral reverse-sequence endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction, with concurrent contralateral endoscopic augmentation mammoplasty permitted;

Patients with preoperative pathological confirmation of non-specialized breast cancer (e.g., ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma) or eligibility for prophylactic mastectomy;

For non-specialized breast cancer patients, preoperative tumor size ≤5 cm (post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy if applicable), and no clinical or imaging evidence of invasion to the nipple, skin, subcutaneous fat, chest wall (referring to the bony thorax and intercostal muscles, excluding the pectoralis major and minor muscles) or distant metastasis preoperatively;

Disqualifiers

History of open breast surgery within 1 year before this procedure (excluding minimally invasive vacuum-assisted biopsy);

Breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or lactation;

Subnipple-plane scarring with radiotherapy;

Metastatic breast cancer (M1);

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • HUAXI hole 1

    Procedure/Surgery

    A small incision of 2mm is made at the junction of the upper outer edge of the areola and the skin, through which the scalpel is placed to assist in the resection of breast glands in reverse-sequence nipple-sparing mastectomy and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Treatment groups

337 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: HH-01 groupExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Control groupNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Operative time

Overall operation time (minute) from skin incision to complete closure of incision, including breast cancer operations, lymph node surgery, and breast reconstructions.

Time frame
Immediate postoperative

Secondary outcomes

1

Complications

Skin flap thermal injury, skin flap ischemia/necrosis, nipple and areola complex(NAC) ischemia/necrosis, surgical site infection, incision dehiscence, surgical site bleeding or hematoma, seroma needing repeated aspiration or drain reinsertion, capsular contracture, prosthesis outline appearance, rippling, implant displacement, implant loss, readmission

Time frame
Immediate postoperative, within 3-month postoperative, and within 1-year postoperative
2

Aesthetic outcome evaluation--BREAST-Q scores

The Satisfaction with Breasts module of BREAST-Q questionnaire is utilized to assess patient-reported aesthetic outcomes. Transformed scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. Both raw questionnaire scores and standardized transformed scores will be documented, along with pre- to postoperative differences in transformed scores

Time frame
Preoperative (baseline), 3-month postoperative, and 2-year postoperative
3

Aesthetic outcome evaluation--Harris score

The Harris score was used to record the subjective judgment of symmetry of the reconstructed breast compared to the contralateral breast. The results were categorized as excellent (treated breast nearly identical to untreated breast), good (treated breast slightly different than untreated), fair (treated breast clearly different than untreated), and poor (treated breast seriously distorted).

Time frame
3-month postoperative and 2-year postoperative
4

Aesthetic outcome evaluation--Ueda score

Doctor-reported aesthetic outcomes will be evaluated by three professional breast surgeons using the Ueda scale, based on postoperative photographs. Scores range from 0 to 10 points, with higher values indicating better results. The categorized as follows: Excellent (≥9 points), Good (7-8 points), Fair (5-6 points), Poor (≤4 points). Both raw scores and categorizations will be documented

Time frame
3-month postoperative and 2-year postoperative

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Du Zhenggui

Lead sponsor

West China Hospital

Sponsor institution

West China Tianfu Hospital

Collaborator

West China Fourth Hospital

Collaborator

Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province

Collaborator

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University

Collaborator

The First Hospital of Jilin University

Collaborator

Shanxi Bethune Hospital

Collaborator

Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital

Collaborator

Suzhou Municipal Hospital

Collaborator

Taiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University

Collaborator

The People's Hospital of DAZU ,Chongqing

Collaborator

Anyang City Tumor Hospital

Collaborator

Mianyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Collaborator

Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

Collaborator

Deyang People's Hospital

Collaborator

Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Collaborator

The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University

Collaborator

Guangzhou First People's Hospital

Collaborator

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Collaborator

Nanchang People's Hospital

Collaborator