The Effects of PeptiStrong and Whey on Muscle Function In Older Adults

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age60-85
SponsorNuritas Ltd

About this trial

Examining the effects of PeptiStrong and protein on muscle function in older adults

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Men and women aged 60 to 85 years at the time of enrolment

Community-dwelling (living independently or with minimal assistance)

Able to walk independently (with or without a walking aid) and complete simple physical function tests (such as standing up from a chair and walking short distances)

Willing and able to attend two study visits at the research facility (baseline and end of study)

Disqualifiers

Any known food allergy or intolerance to fava bean protein or milk protein

Diagnosed kidney disease or any medical condition where increased protein intake is contraindicated

Yes to any of the answers on the "Older Adult Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire"

Individuals with implanted electronic devices

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • PeptiStrong + whey protein

    Dietary supplement

    Fava bean protein hydrolysate containing bioactive peptides mixed with whey protein as dry powder for drinkable protein shake

  • Whey protein

    Dietary supplement

    Whey protein as dry powder for drinkable protein shake

Treatment groups

80 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: PeptiStrong + whey proteinExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Whey proteinActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Hand Grip Strength via hand held dynamometer

Change from baseline to end of study in grip strength as assessed via hand held dynamometer

Time frame
Baseline to Week 4

Secondary outcomes

1

Chair Stand Test - Part of short performance physical battery

Change from baseline to end of study in physical function assessment via chair stands. This test measures the time taken to complete 5 sit-to-stand repetitions in seconds. A lower time (fewer seconds) = better performance. As part of the full short performance physical battery it is converted to a subscore of 0-4, where a higher score = better performance

Time frame
Baseline to week 4
2

Gait Speed as part of short performance physical battery

Change from baseline to end of study in physical function assessment assessed as time to walk a fixed distance in seconds and reporting in meters per second. Higher speeds indicate better performance. This is converted to a subscore of 0-4 within the full short performance physical battery

Time frame
Baseline to week 4
3

6 Minute Walking Endurance Test

Change from baseline to end of study in physical function and endurance assessed as the total distance walked in 6 minutes in meters. A greater distance reflects better walking endurance and functional capacity.

Time frame
Baseline to week 4
4

Balance test as part of short performance physical battery

Change from baseline to end of study in balance as assessed by the ability to hold three standing positions of increasing difficulty: side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem stance in seconds. Higher scores indicate better balance. The overall score is converted to a a sub-score of 0-4 within the full short performance physical battery.

Time frame
Baseline to week 4

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Nuritas Ltd

Lead sponsor

Liverpool John Moores University

Collaborator