The Feasibility of a Remote Problem-Solving Intervention for Autistic Adolescents or Young Adults and a Caregiver

ConditionAutism
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age13-21
SponsorUniversity of Missouri-Columbia

About this trial

This project seeks to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a remote metacognitive strategy training intervention in transition-age autistic adolescents and young adults and a primary caregiver. We will also conduct limited efficacy testing.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Autistic adolescents aged 13-21 AND one primary parent, guardian, or caregiver aged 18 or older

At least one year remaining in high school

Ability to engage in reciprocal conversation

Ability to provide informed consent/assent as part of an adapted procedure designed to prevent coercion and protect the rights of autistic adolescents with or without intellectual disability

Disqualifiers

Severe or profound intellectual disability (IQ<35)

Severe mental health conditions that interfere with ability to participate in the intervention

Currently enrolled in community-based transition services redundant with remote PREP

Trial design

Design model

Crossover

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP)

    Behavioral

    Pathways and Resources for Engagement and Participation (PREP) is a collaborative problem-solving intervention that targets environmental barriers-physical, social, attitudinal, familial, and institutional-while leveraging adolescent and family strengths. Caregivers are integrated as key supports. The five-step process includes: (1) make goals, (2) map out a plan, (3) make it happen, (4) measure outcomes, and (5) move forward. We will set four activity-based transition goals using the Transition Planning Inventory-2nd Edition and Goal Attainment Scaling. Providers will use guided discovery to help adolescents and caregivers identify strategies that modify activities or environments to support participation in transition activities. Adolescents and caregivers will implement strategies between sessions and revise strategies with the provider in future sessions if unsuccessful. Participants will complete 12 weekly 60-min remote PREP sessions over 12-16 weeks.

Treatment groups

24 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: Remote Metacognitive Strategy TrainingExperimental treatment 1 intervention
Group B: Waitlist ControlNo intervention 0 interventions

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

Measure of intervention acceptability. Self-report Likert scale from 1 -completely disagree to 5 - completely agree

Time frame
Intervention - week 13; Waitlist control - week 25
2

Semi-Structured Interview

A brief interview to gather participant perceptions of the intervention, including their perceived benefit and practicality of the intervention and suggestions for improvement for the intervention. Data will be qualitative interview transcripts.

Time frame
Intervention - week 13; Waitlist control - week 25

Secondary outcomes

1

Participation and Environment Measure - Child and Youth

Caregiver proxy report measure of adolescent activity participation at home, school, and in the community. Caregivers rate adolescents' participation frequency (0 - never to 7 - daily) and involvement (1 - minimally involved to 5 - very involved). Higher scores represent better adolescent participation.

Time frame
Intervention - Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), follow-up (week 25); Waitlist control- Baseline (week 0), second baseline (week 13), post-intervention (week 25)
2

Youth, Young Adult Participation and Environment Measure

Self-report measure of adolescent and young adult activity participation at home, school, and in the community. Adolescents and young adults rate their participation frequency (0 - never to 7 - daily) and involvement (1 - minimally involved to 5 - very involved). Higher scores represent better adolescent participation.

Time frame
Intervention - Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), follow-up (week 25); Waitlist Control - Baseline (week 0), second baseline (week 13), post-intervention (week 25)
3

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Global Health Measure 7+2

Informant and self-report questionnaire of adolescent and young adult physical and mental health. Item responses range from 1 - poor to 5 - excellent. Higher scores represent better health.

Time frame
Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), follow-up (week 25); Baseline (week 0), second baseline (week 13), post-intervention (week 25)
4

Transition Readiness Scale

Informant and self-report measure of adolescent transition readiness (education, work, independent living). Self-report scale that ranges from 1 - not true for me/my child to 4 - true for me/my child. Higher scores represent better transition readiness.

Time frame
Intervention - Baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 13), follow-up (week 25); Waitlist Control - Baseline (week 0), second baseline (week 13), post-intervention (week 25)

Other outcomes

1

Transition Planning Inventory - 3rd Edition

A four-section survey about student preferences and interests for post-secondary outcomes. Respondents identify a goal for work, school, or independent living and answer five open-ended questions related to their goal. Qualitative responses will be used to co-create goals for intervention sessions.

Time frame
Baseline (Week 0)

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.