Tolerance, Use and Performance of the PEASY Urine Collection Device in Hospitalized Patients

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot listed
Trial typeObservational
Biological sexMale
Age18+
SponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

About this trial

At present, 3 types of urine collection device can be distinguished: absorbent devices (diaper-type), penile clamps and penile collection sheaths. Both pads and penile sheaths are used depending on the department concerned, the clinical context and user preferences. A 2023 survey at Nîmes University Hospital showed that penis sleeves have undesirable side effects like fixation problems and pain on removal, and care assistants reported penile irritation caused by the penis sleeve. Caregivers also reported difficulties when handling and using penis sleeves.

There is clearly a need for a better device.To overcome the disadvantages of penis covers, the PEASY project team at Nîmes University Hospital has developed a practical, non-invasive medical device for eliminating urine, positioned on the glans: the PEASY device. This device is held in place by a non-adhesive fastening system that involves the foreskin, to ensure leakage-free urine flow.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Patients requiring non-invasive urine collection.

Incontinent patient for whom the use of a penile pouch to control leakage has been suggested by the care team.

Uncircumcised patient.

Patient with no physical anomaly preventing complete unhooding (phimosis, micropenis, penile invagination, etc.).

Disqualifiers

Patient participating in another high-risk interventional study.

Patient in an exclusion period determined by another study.

Patient under court protection, guardianship or curatorship.

Patient unable to give consent.

Trial population

For the purposes of the study, 20 incontinent patients for whom the use of a penile pouch to control leakage has been suggested by the care team, will be recruited from the active file of patients hospitalized in the Geriatric Medicine department of the CHU de Nîmes.

Trial design

Design model

Cohort

Time perspective

Prospective

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Daily use of the PEASY urine collection device for 5 days

    Device

    The PEASY device features a non-adhesive attachment system to the penis, unlike penile sheaths which are used for the same indications and whose attachment system is based on an adhesive system. Fixation of the PEASY device to the penis involves the use of a clamp on the foreskin. The clamp has a certain elasticity and has been developed to be atraumatic. The medical device comprises a glans cup which covers the urinary meatus. This cup therefore rests on the glans.

  • Daily collection of patient feedback using a visual analog scale (0-100)

    Other intervention

    Daily collection of patient feedback using a visual analog scale (0-100) and any suggestions for improving the device during an open interview at the end of the test period.

Treatment groups

No treatment groups listed

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Daily measurement (at each change) from the patient's point of view. Pain in the glans

Pain in the glans will be recorded on a 0-100 visual analog scale in which 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain.

Time frame
Day 1
2

Daily measurement (at each change) from the patient's point of view. Pruritis/burning in glans or foreskin

Pruritus/burning in the glans or foreskin will be recorded on a 0-100 visual analog scale in which 0 = no pruritis/burning and 100 = worst possible pruritis/burning.

Time frame
Day 1
3

Daily measurement (at each change) from the patient's point of view. Sensation of discomfort

Sensation of discomfort will be recorded on a 0-100 visual analog scale in which 0 = no discomfort and 100 = worst possible discomfort.

Time frame
Day 1
4

Daily measurement (at each change) from the patient's point of view. Pain in the glans

Pain in the glans will be recorded on a 0-100 visual analog scale in which 0 = no pain and 100 = worst possible pain.

Time frame
Day 2

Secondary outcomes

1

A. Performance of PEASY from the caregiver's point of view: Bladder weakness

YES/NO

Time frame
Day 1
2

A. Performance of PEASY from the caregiver's point of view: Bladder weakness

YES/NO

Time frame
Day 2
3

A. Performance of PEASY from the caregiver's point of view: Bladder weakness

YES/NO

Time frame
Day 3
4

A. Performance of PEASY from the caregiver's point of view: Bladder weakness

YES/NO

Time frame
Day 4

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.