Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Treatment With COMS One Device in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age22-90
SponsorPiomic Medical

About this trial

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the treatment with the COMS One device in subjects with refractory diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The prospective randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial is designed to demonstrate superiority of wound closure of the COMS One device to a sham-control device through 24 weeks post-application, when each is administered in conjunction with standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of DFUs.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Subjects are male or female, ≥22 and ≤90 years of age

Female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use acceptable methods of contraception (birth control pills, barriers, or abstinence) starting at screening and throughout the duration of their study participation.

The participant (or LAR if applicable) must be able to understand and sign the informed consent form (ICF) and comply with requirements set in the protocol including trial visits, trial treatment and dressing regimens and compliance with required offloading device (if applicable)

Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Disqualifiers

Known pregnancy or lactating

Active skin cancer, a history of skin cancer or any other localized cancer, precancerous lesions or large moles in the areas to be treated.

Subject who is taking any medications the Investigator believes may interfere with healing of the target DFU

Subject who is currently undergoing treatment for an active systemic infection, including osteomyelitis

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • COMS One device

    Device

    The COMS One device incorporates technologies for optical and magnetic stimulation. The optical stimulation component is designed to emit light by two types of light emitting diodes (LEDs) in the wavelength of 660 nm (red) and 830 nm (near infrared) range of the electromagnetic spectra. The magnetic stimulation component is generated by a coil emitting pulse modulated magnetic fields in the extremely low frequency (ELF) range of the electromagnetic spectra. The COMS One is a lightweight, portable device. The device is locally applied via a single use disposable component (COMStouch) that provides a base and sterile barrier for the unit. The device is attached via a single use strap (COMSfix). The device has been slightly adapted in order to make sure blinding is achieved/maintained. The specific feature that has been modified for the purpose of blinding is sensor detecting whether the device is lying on the skin.

  • Sham device

    Device

    The Sham device is a lightweight, portable device. The device is applied via a single use disposable component (COMStouch) that provides a base and sterile barrier for the unit. The device is attached via a single use strap (COMSfix). The device has been slightly adapted in order to make sure blinding is achieved/maintained. The specific features that have been modified for the purposes of blinding include the following: 1) therapeutic output, and 2) sensor detecting whether the device is lying on the skin.

Treatment groups

450 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: COMS One deviceActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Sham deviceSham comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Complete wound healing

The primary endpoint for this pivotal trial is time to complete wound closure from randomization through 24 weeks, which is defined as complete skin re-epithelialization without drainage confirmed by 2 consecutive trial visits 2 weeks apart.

Time frame
24 weeks post-application

Secondary outcomes

1

Time to ≥50% wound area reduction

Time in number of days until wound area is reduced by ≥50% compared to wound area at time of randomization

Time frame
Through 24 weeks
2

Time to ≥90% wound area reduction

Time in number of days until wound area is reduced by ≥90% compared to wound area at time of randomization

Time frame
Through 24 weeks
3

Incidence of complete wound closure

Incidence of complete wound closure after 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks, which is defined as complete skin re-epithelialization without drainage

Time frame
8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week and 24 week
4

Partial wound closure

Percent Wound Area Reduction (PWAR) at week 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Time frame
8 week, 12 week, 16 week, 20 week and 24 week

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.