[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"leadSponsorName\":\"Fatma mahanna\",\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:":45},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":4,"hasResults":10,"nctId":11,"briefTitle":12,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":10,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":27,"overallStatus":33,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":34,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":35,"startDateStruct":38,"completionDateStruct":40,"leadSponsor":42,"locationsCount":5},"100599028",false,"NCT07079163","Comparison of Conventional and 3D-printed Surgical Obturators for Maxillary Defects","Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Prosthetic Complications Between Conventional Immediate Surgical Obturators and 3D-printed Immediate Surgical Obturators With Enhanced Retention","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Patients indicated for maxillectomy with the remaining number of teeth\n* Referral to Maxillofacial Prosthodontic Unit, Mansoura University\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* contraindication to surgery (not physically fit to underwent surgery)","ALL","36 Years","68 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},24,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications associated with three types of immediate surgical obturators used in maxillectomy patients. A total of 24 patients with acquired maxillary defects will be randomly assigned to receive one of three obturator designs: (1) conventional obturators retained with clasps and wire, (2) resin 3D-printed obturators with printed clasps and palatal screws, or (3) metallic 3D-printed obturators with metal clasps and palatal screws.\n\nPatient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), and postoperative complications such as discomfort, lack of retention, or mucosal irritation . The study seeks to determine whether digital fabrication and enhanced retention methods improve clinical outcomes compared to traditional approaches",[26],"Maxillary Defect Reconstruction",[28,29,30,31,32],"Maxillary defects","Immediate surgical obturator","patient-centered outcomes","Digital","3D-printed","RECRUITING","2025-07-21",{"date":36,"type":37},"2025-07-24","ACTUAL",{"date":39,"type":37},"2025-01-25",{"date":41,"type":20},"2025-12-31",{"name":43,"class":44},"Fatma mahanna","OTHER",""]