Anastomotic Leakage

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether early postoperative colonoscopy is valuable in the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after surgery for low colorectal cancer.The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Will the median diagnosis time of AL in the intervention group (early colonoscopy group) be significantly shorter than that in the control group? 2. Can targeted treatment (such as endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT)) be initiated earlier in the early colonoscopy group, thereby reducing the incidence of AL and the rate of unplanned re-laparotomy? Researchers will compare the median diagnosis time of AL in the intervention group (early colonoscopy group) with the control group to observe whether early postoperative colonoscopy can detect anastomotic leakage earlier. Participants will: Experimental group (early colonoscopy group): 1. Colonoscopy will be performed on the 5th to 8th day after surgery (the surgeon will decide the specific date within this time window based on the patient's recovery). 2. Carry out adequate intestinal preparation before the examination (the specific plan is formulated according to the hospital's routine, which may involve antegrade or retrograde enema, etc., and needs to be recorded and standardized). Control group (routine observation group): 1. Receive standard postoperative management, including monitoring vital signs, abdominal signs, drainage fluid properties, etc. 2. Only when clinical symptoms suspected of anastomotic leakage occur (such as persistent fever, worsening abdominal pain, turbid drainage fluid or stool samples), CT scan, gastrointestinal angiography or diagnostic colonoscopy should be performed according to clinical indications.

Introduction: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most severe complication following colorectal surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. VacStent therapy is a promising therapeutic approach, combining endoscopic vacuum therapy with mechanical stability of a stent and thereby allowing continued fecal passage. It may enhance anastomotic healing and reduce the need for a diverting ostomy or additional surgical procedures. VACStent Use for the treatment of anastomotic leakage following coloREctal surgery (VACURE) study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of VacStent therapy for colorectal AL. Methods and analysis: VACURE is a prospective, multicenter efficacy study conducted at ten Dutch hospitals. Forty patients will be included over 18 months. All patients (≥18 years) with AL of the distal sigmoid, upper or mid rectum following colorectal resection will be considered for treatment with the VacStent GI Colon device. Trained endoscopists will perform stent placement, exchanges, and removal. Patients will remain hospitalized and those without diverting ostomy will receive osmotic laxatives and a fiber-free diet during treatment. Anastomotic healing will be confirmed endoscopically and radiologically posttreatment. The primary endpoint is the primary endpoint is the rate of participants that achieve complete anastomotic healing without the need for further interventions (confirmed by radiologic and endoscopic assessment). Secondary endpoints include safety, percentage of functioning anastomoses at 1 year post-treatment, 1-year stoma-free survival, diverting ostomy omission, healing time, number of stents, complications, reinterventions, length of hospitalization, pain scores, functional and quality of life outcomes up to 1 year posttreatment, patient experiences, and cost-effectiveness.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if somatostatin plus a clear liquid diet can help prevent severe leakage after rectal cancer surgery in adults with low or mid rectal cancer who are scheduled to have ultra-low anterior resection. These patients have a higher risk of leakage where the bowel is joined together after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does somatostatin plus a clear liquid diet prevent severe leakage within 1 month after surgery about as well as a prophylactic diverting stoma? What medical problems, bowel function problems, recovery outcomes, and quality of life outcomes do participants have after surgery and during follow-up? Researchers will compare somatostatin plus a clear liquid diet without a diverting stoma to prophylactic diverting stoma to see if the somatostatin plus clear liquid diet regimen can provide similar protection against severe leakage while reducing the need for stoma creation. Participants will: Have rectal cancer surgery with the bowel joined very close to the anus Be randomly assigned to receive either somatostatin plus a clear liquid diet for 7 days after surgery without a diverting stoma, or a prophylactic diverting stoma Have follow-up assessments of leakage, postoperative complications, bowel function, recovery quality, and quality of life Complete follow-up visits or assessments for up to 3 years after surgery

To evaluate the effectiveness of the gastroscopy, air, and methylene blue (GAM) leak testing in reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications, especially anastomotic leakage, in patients with colorectal cancer. The primary outcomes included is the incidence of anastomotic complications (mainly anastomotic leak) within 30 days after surgery

This is a multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled study aimed at compareing the impact of stapler reinforcement patches versus standard staplers on postoperative complications in gastrojejunostomy.

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative Pre-emptive EVT (PEVT) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leaks within 30 days after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Compare the differences between the PEVT group and the control group in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, and total medical costs. Analyze the incidence of other postoperative complications in the two groups, such as wound infection, abdominal abscess, and intestinal obstruction. Assess the impact of PEVT on postoperative recovery indicators, including time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and time to ambulation. Observe the occurrence of PEVT-related adverse events, such as device displacement, bleeding, and infection.

The goal of this observational multicenter study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a single-stapled technique (SST) for colorectal anastomosis and to explore whether this technique is associated with a reduced rate of anastomotic leakage compared with the conventional double-stapled technique (DST). The study includes adult patients undergoing planned left-sided colorectal resection with colorectal anastomosis, including sigmoid resection, left hemicolectomy, or partial mesorectal excision (PME), for benign or malignant disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the rate of anastomotic leakage within 90 days after surgery in patients operated with the single-stapled technique? Is the single-stapled technique feasible and safe across different surgical approaches (open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted surgery) in a multicenter setting? Furthermore, outcomes after single-stapled anastomosis will be compared with a retrospective cohort of patients operated with the conventional double-stapled technique to explore potential differences in anastomotic leakage rates and postoperative complications. Participants will receive standard surgical care as determined by the treating surgical team. Patients included in the prospective part of the study will undergo colorectal anastomosis using the single-stapled technique as part of routine clinical practice. Data on perioperative variables, postoperative complications (including anastomotic leakage graded according to international consensus definitions), and follow-up outcomes will be collected prospectively using an electronic case report form (eCRF). A retrospective cohort from the same participating centers will be identified through medical record review using identical inclusion criteria. The results of this study are intended to provide robust multicenter data on the safety and clinical outcomes of the single-stapled technique and to serve as the basis for planning a future randomized controlled multicenter trial.

This is a Single-center bidirectional cohort study combined with prospective sample analysis conducted by the Department of General Surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Xinqiao Hospital). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively collect the preoperative serum sialic acid content and postoperative pathological data of colorectal cancer patients in our hospital's medical order system (including tumor size and stage, etc.) and anastomotic leakage, and analyze the correlation between serum sialic acid content and pathological characteristics of tumor and the correlation between anastomotic leakage; and further collect the feces of colorectal cancer patients in our hospital for 16S microbiome sequencing, and detect their sialic acid content, and observe the relationship between fecal sialic acid content and tumor size and stage; Intestinal flora composition and postoperative anastomotic leakage correlation, provide a new theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of postoperative anastomotic malhealing.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Colorectal Balloon Tube (hereinafter referred to as COLO-BT™) device, a single use, temporary intraluminal bypass device, intended to reduce contact of fecal content with an anastomotic site, following colorectal surgery (open or laparoscopic)

This international multicentre retrospective cohort study aims to research anastomotic leakage after colon cancer resection and has two main objectives: 1. To identify predictive factors associated with 90-day mortality and 90-day Clavien-Dindo grade 4-5 complications amongst patients who developed AL following colon cancer resection and to develop and validate a prediction model for predicting 90-day mortality as well as the co-primary composite endpoint Clavien-Dindo grade 4-5 complications. 2. To explore and compare the effectiveness of various treatment strategies for AL following colon cancer resection, considering patient, tumour, resection and leakage characteristics.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications following laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. According to the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISREC), AL is defined as a defect of intestinal wall integrity at the colorectal or coloanal anastomosis leading to a communication between the intra- and extraluminal compartments, including defects of the suture or staple lines of the neorectal reservoir. AL is classified into three grades based on clinical severity: Grade A, identified only radiologically without clinical symptoms; Grade B, presenting with localized or atypical peritonitis requiring antibiotics and local drainage but not surgery; and Grade C, causing severe peritonitis, systemic toxicity symptoms requiring urgent surgical intervention, and potentially leading to life-threatening situations. AL can prolong hospitalization, necessitate reoperation, delay chemotherapy, increase local recurrence rates, and adversely affect survival and quality of life. Emergency surgical management of AL often requires meticulous peritoneal lavage and ileostomy, aiming for subsequent anastomotic healing or future digestive tract reconstruction. However, some patients face significant challenges due to postoperative adhesions and persistent anastomotic defects despite prolonged lavage. Identified risk factors for AL after rectal cancer surgery include male gender, advanced age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and advanced TNM staging (III-IV). Additionally, preoperative chemoradiotherapy-induced bowel edema and fibrosis, bowel obstruction, and long-term malnutrition resulting in hypoproteinemia are significant contributors. Mechanical reinforcement of anastomoses using sutures or absorbable barbed sutures has been shown to significantly reduce AL rates in previous studies. This single-center prospective phase II clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous circumferential reinforcement using absorbable barbed sutures in laparoscopic rectal anastomosis to prevent AL. We will compare the incidence of AL and other postoperative complications between patients undergoing reinforced anastomosis and a control group receiving standard laparoscopic rectal anastomosis.

Evaluating the differences between D2 and D3 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in patients with right cancer colon post-operative outcome, intra-operative blood transfusion, post-operative ICU admission, anastomotic leakage, lymph node harvesting in the final specimen, and six months follow up and overall survival time after 5-years