Colorectal Surgery

Persistent pain after colorectal surgery remains a significant clinical challenge that can delay recovery, reduce quality of life, and increase long-term healthcare burden. The goal of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the biological and clinical factors that influence pain severity after colorectal surgery and contribute to the transition from acute to chronic postoperative pain. Guided by a biopsychosocial framework, this research will address the following aims: 1. The investigators will use standardized experimental pain testing before surgery to evaluate how patients respond to different types of controlled sensory stimuli. These responses may help predict who is more likely to experience severe or prolonged pain after surgery. 2. The investigators will analyze blood samples collected before and after surgery to measure markers of inflammation and other biological responses. These data will help us explore how the body's immune and hormonal systems relate to pain severity in both the short- and longer-term recovery phases. 3. The investigators will assess psychological and clinical factors, such as emotional health, coping style, household income, and life stressors, to understand how they contribute to patients' pain experiences throughout recovery. 4. The investigators will examine whether routinely collected demographic and clinical characteristics can help identify patients at greater risk of experiencing higher levels of pain after surgery. This approach will allow us to better understand which patients may benefit from more tailored perioperative pain management strategies.

Following colon surgery, surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common complication and leads to longer recovery time for patients and increased health care costs. Currently, there is high quality evidence to show that the combination of intravenous antibiotics (IVA), mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and oral antibiotics (OA) is the most effective bowel preparation to reduce SSI. However, there are no studies comparing IVA+MBP+OA and IVA+OA. This is an important question because if IVA+OA works the same as IVA+MBP+OA, then MBP may be safely omitted as part of the bowel preparation to reduce SSI and patients would avoid the side effects of MBP prior to their surgery. Therefore, the objective is to perform a trial to determine if IVA+OA works the same as IVA+MBP+OA to reduce SSI following colon surgery.

Introduction: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most severe complication following colorectal surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. VacStent therapy is a promising therapeutic approach, combining endoscopic vacuum therapy with mechanical stability of a stent and thereby allowing continued fecal passage. It may enhance anastomotic healing and reduce the need for a diverting ostomy or additional surgical procedures. VACStent Use for the treatment of anastomotic leakage following coloREctal surgery (VACURE) study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of VacStent therapy for colorectal AL. Methods and analysis: VACURE is a prospective, multicenter efficacy study conducted at ten Dutch hospitals. Forty patients will be included over 18 months. All patients (≥18 years) with AL of the distal sigmoid, upper or mid rectum following colorectal resection will be considered for treatment with the VacStent GI Colon device. Trained endoscopists will perform stent placement, exchanges, and removal. Patients will remain hospitalized and those without diverting ostomy will receive osmotic laxatives and a fiber-free diet during treatment. Anastomotic healing will be confirmed endoscopically and radiologically posttreatment. The primary endpoint is the primary endpoint is the rate of participants that achieve complete anastomotic healing without the need for further interventions (confirmed by radiologic and endoscopic assessment). Secondary endpoints include safety, percentage of functioning anastomoses at 1 year post-treatment, 1-year stoma-free survival, diverting ostomy omission, healing time, number of stents, complications, reinterventions, length of hospitalization, pain scores, functional and quality of life outcomes up to 1 year posttreatment, patient experiences, and cost-effectiveness.

This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and oblique subcostal transverse abdominal plane block (OSTAPB) for postoperative analgesia in colorectal surgery.

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of perioperative Oral Nutritional Supplementation (ONS) combined with an optimized, tailored diet in reducing the risk of postoperative complications and improving the nutritional status of colorectal cancer patients scheduled for curative colorectal resection.

The goal of this study to test if a care transition intervention designed for older colorectal surgery patients would improve outcomes after discharge. It will assess the feasibility of the intervention.

The Hugo RAS Colorectal Collaborative (HRCC) is an international, multicenter dataset of patients undergoing colorectal surgery using the Hugo RAS system. The registry aims to analyze short and long-term outcomes to provide real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the system.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the gastroscopy, air, and methylene blue (GAM) leak testing in reducing the incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications, especially anastomotic leakage, in patients with colorectal cancer. The primary outcomes included is the incidence of anastomotic complications (mainly anastomotic leak) within 30 days after surgery

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative Pre-emptive EVT (PEVT) in reducing the incidence of anastomotic leaks within 30 days after surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Compare the differences between the PEVT group and the control group in terms of operation time, length of hospital stay, and total medical costs. Analyze the incidence of other postoperative complications in the two groups, such as wound infection, abdominal abscess, and intestinal obstruction. Assess the impact of PEVT on postoperative recovery indicators, including time to first flatus, time to first defecation, and time to ambulation. Observe the occurrence of PEVT-related adverse events, such as device displacement, bleeding, and infection.

Colorectal surgery patients face excessive catabolism, increasing inflammation and immune compromise. The administration of nutritional supplements known as immunonutrition before gastrointestinal surgery has been shown to improve clinical outcomes; however, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain inconclusive. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative nutritional supplementation with an immunonutrient-enriched formula compared to an isocaloric and isoproteic formula on plasma BCAA concentration in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. A double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Patients will be required to drink the supplement daily for the 7 days preceding the surgical intervention. Patients in both groups will be instructed to maintain their usual food intake. During the study, there will be two patient assessments and a review of medical records to document the outcomes.

Rationale: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication of colon surgery, with an incidence of 2.7-11.9%. It is associated with long-term increased mortality, reduced quality of life, and high healthcare costs due to reoperations and prolonged hospitalization. Among colon cancer patients, 5-year survival rates are 70% for those with AL compared to 81% for those without. A retrospective case-control study identified a \>50% stenosis of the Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) as a significant risk factor, increasing AL odds by six times (OR: 5.9, 95% CI: 2.7-12.6, p \< .001). Primary objective: The ALPrES2MA study aims to evaluate whether preventive endovascular stenting of a \>50% stenosed SMA origin reduces the risk of AL following colon surgery. Secondary objectives: Classification of severity of AL, incidence of delayed AL (\>90 days), Mesenteric Artery Calcification Score (MACS), surgical complications, hospital (re)admissions, Quality of life (including health related quality of life), healthcare and societal costs, cost-effectiveness (expressed as incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year gained), and budget impact. Additionally, the added value of quantitative fluorescence angiography (qFA) in predicting AL during surgery, in hospitals with suitable equipment and experience, will be explored. This will enhance surgeons' capabilities in preventing AL. Study design: Nationwide multicentre randomized controlled trail with a 1:1 fashion Study population: Patients, 40 years and over, in the participating hospitals in the Netherlands with a \>50% SMA origin stenosis scheduled for elective colorectal resection with a primary anastomosis for malignant or benign colorectal pathology. Intervention: Intervention group will undergo preventive percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and endovascular covered stenting of the SMA, within preferably two weeks prior to the colon resection. Control group will not undergo PTA and endovascular stenting of the \>50% SMA stenosis prior to the colon resection. Both groups will be treated with a mono antiplatelet therapy, i.e., carbasalate calcium (Ascal ®), for stent patency and atherosclerotic risk reduction. Intervention group has an indication for lifelong mono antiplatelet therapy and control group for at least 12 months Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the incidence of a clinically relevant AL within 90 days post-surgery. Secondary endpoints include AL classification/severity, calcification scores of aortic and mesenteric vessels, stenting complications, stent patency, intra-operative qFA measurements, operative duration, all causes of post-operative complications within 90 days, all reinterventions; surgical (including endovascular) and non-surgical within 90 days, duration of primary postoperative hospital stay and readmission within 12 months, 12 month mortality, patient-reported outcomes on month 0-3-6-12, cost-effectiveness budget impact analysis and stent patency. The total follow-up duration will be a total of 12 months.

The goal of this Clinical Investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the discharge protocol of the remote monitoring platform after colorectal surgery in patients at risk of hospital readmission. Participants will be randomized into either the "30 days of remote monitoring" group or the "conventional discharge" group. The patient returns to the site for their postoperative visit at 30 days and is contacted by phone 90 days after their surgery.

Persistent pain after colorectal surgery remains a significant clinical challenge that can delay recovery, reduce quality of life, and increase long-term healthcare burden. The goal of this study is to gain a deeper understanding of the biological and clinical factors that influence pain severity after colorectal surgery and contribute to the transition from acute to chronic postoperative pain. Guided by a biopsychosocial framework, this research will address the following aims: 1. The investigators will use standardized experimental pain testing before surgery to evaluate how patients respond to different types of controlled sensory stimuli. These responses may help predict who is more likely to experience severe or prolonged pain after surgery. 2. The investigators will analyze blood samples collected before and after surgery to measure markers of inflammation and other biological responses. These data will help us explore how the body's immune and hormonal systems relate to pain severity in both the short- and longer-term recovery phases. 3. The investigators will assess psychological and clinical factors, such as emotional health, coping style, household income, and life stressors, to understand how they contribute to patients' pain experiences throughout recovery. 4. The investigators will examine whether routinely collected demographic and clinical characteristics can help identify patients at greater risk of experiencing higher levels of pain after surgery. This approach will allow us to better understand which patients may benefit from more tailored perioperative pain management strategies.

In colorectal surgery, one of the most feared complications is anastomotic leak (AL). To limit the consequences of AL, it must be diagnosed as early as possible, before it becomes symptomatic. Digestive surgeons use a variety of pre-, per- and post-operative techniques to reduce the rate of anastomotic fistula, but the risk persists, with a rate of 7% reported in the literature. It has been shown that the value of CRP between D1 and D5 correlates with the risk of AL, and that the trajectory between two consecutive days (D1 to D5 post-op) is the most discriminating element in predicting the risk of AF. This assay requires repeated intravenous sampling, which is the opposite of simplifying care. CRP point-of-care testing (POCT) is used in clinical practice, notably in pediatrics and outpatient medicine (in children and adults) to help prescribe probabilistic antibiotic therapy, as the instantaneousness of the result has an impact on patient management. For the diagnosis of AL, CRP POCT assessment could reduce the number of blood samples taken, shorten the time between sampling and medical management in cases of suspected AL, and thus improve the patient's post-operative experience.

Effective postoperative pain management is essential for enhanced recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This randomized, controlled, double-blind trial will compare conventional postoperative analgesia (intravenous medications plus surgical wound infiltration) with a locoregional strategy combining a peripheral autonomic block (inferior mesenteric and superior hypogastric plexuses) and a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. We hypothesize that the combined strategy (BAPTAP) reduces pain intensity and opioid consumption in the first 48 hours after Left-Sided Colorectal Resection.

This study is being conducted to determine the length of time a urinary catheter is needed to drain urine from the bladder after colorectal surgery. Urinary retention is a well known complication after pelvic colorectal surgery, and current practice is to continue urinary catheterization for 3- days following pelvic colorectal surgery in an effort to avoid this complication. However, prolonged urinary catheterization is associated with increased risk of urinary tract infections as well as longer hospital stays. The investigators hypothesize that postoperative urinary catheters may be safely removed on postoperative day 1 without increased urinary retention rates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a shorter duration of urinary catheterization (1 day) is non-inferior when compared to standard duration (3 days) in regards to postoperative urinary retention. The investigators plan to perform a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial comparing the urinary catheter duration of 1 day and 3 days with the primary endpoint of postoperative urinary retention. Secondary endpoints are urinary tract infection and length of hospital stay. The participants will be randomly assigned to the control group (catheter removal on postoperative day 3) or the experimental group (catheter removal on postoperative day 1).

This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led early mobilization protocol on postoperative recovery outcomes in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. The outcomes assessed include walking distance, mobility levels, gastrointestinal function (time to first flatus and first defecation), nausea, vomiting, comfort, fatigue, time to initiation of oral intake, patient satisfaction, incidence of postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay. Research Question: In patients undergoing colorectal surgery (P), does a nurse-led early mobilization protocol (I), compared with standard mobilization practices (C), improve postoperative recovery outcomes (O), including walking distance, mobility levels, gastrointestinal function (time to first flatus and first defecation), nausea, vomiting, comfort, fatigue, time to initiation of oral intake, patient satisfaction, postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay?

Post-operative ileus is a temporary stoppage of bowel function following surgery. Indeed it can occur in 20% of cases during post-operative follow-up of bowel surgery. The absence of resumption of transit can lead to the implementation of specific treatments such as the placement of a nasogastric tube and drug treatments. To date, the definition of this event is not accepted by everyone and is not based on reproducible evaluation criteria. The main objective of this study is to evaluate a score used to date to define postoperative ileus, the IFEED score, and to compare it to the length of postoperative stay.

Protective diverting stomas are frequently constructed after low anterior resection or colorectal anastomosis to mitigate the consequences of anastomotic leakage, one of the most feared complications in colorectal surgery. Both loop ileostomy (LI) and loop transverse colostomy (TC) are accepted methods of diversion. Randomized and observational studies have shown that faecal diversion significantly reduces the clinical severity of leaks and the need for reoperation compared with no diversion. The choice between LI and TC remains controversial. Loop ileostomy is technically straightforward and associated with shorter operative time and fewer septic complications at closure. However, it carries specific risks, including high-output stoma, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and renal impairment, which may lead to hospital readmissions. Conversely, loop transverse colostomy is associated with fewer fluid and electrolyte issues, but has higher rates of prolapse, skin irritation, and wound complications at closure. Meta-analyses comparing LI and TC indicate no clear superiority, with each approach demonstrating distinct patterns of morbidity. Some randomized trials have suggested lower major morbidity with LI, while others found no significant difference. Given the heterogeneity of outcomes and limited high-quality, adequately powered trials, further randomized evidence is needed to guide optimal stoma selection in colorectal surgery.

This study is a clinical research project conducted at Xijing Hospital to compare the effects of two different neuromuscular blockade reversal strategies on the recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function after colorectal surgery. Many patients experience slow recovery of bowel function after colorectal surgery, which can lead to discomfort, nausea, vomiting, and a longer hospital stay. This study investigates whether using one medication (sugammadex) to reverse muscle relaxants used during anesthesia leads to better and faster recovery of gastrointestinal function compared to a traditional combination of medications (neostigmine with atropine). The study will include 560 adults scheduled for elective colorectal surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive either: Sugammadex (2 mg/kg), OR Neostigmine (30 μg/kg) + Atropine (15 μg/kg) The assigned study drug will be given by intravenous injection at the end of surgery, once measurements show the muscle relaxant is starting to wear off. The patients, surgeons, outcome assessors, and statisticians will be blinded. The main goal is to see if more patients in one group recover their gastrointestinal function within 72 hours after surgery. Gastrointestinal recovery is strictly defined as both being able to tolerate food/drinks without significant nausea/vomiting AND having passed gas or had a bowel movement. The study will also compare many other important outcomes between the groups, including: 1. Time to first passage of gas, first bowel movement, and first toleration of food. 2. Pain scores and opioid pain medication use. 3. Rates of nausea and vomiting. 4. Overall quality of recovery and patient satisfaction. 5. Length of hospital stay and total hospitalization costs. 6. Occurrence of complications within 30 days after surgery. 7. The safety of both reversal strategies will be closely monitored throughout the study by recording any adverse events. This research aims to provide high-quality evidence to help anesthesiologists and surgeons choose the best method to reverse muscle relaxation, potentially leading to faster recovery, fewer complications, and a better overall experience for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

The objective of this prospective, international cohort is to incorporate the low stable pressure (using Airseal Insufflator) approach and its associated parameters into the early rehabilitation program after colorectal surgery so as to shorten hospitalization up to the ambulatory care and reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Colorectal Balloon Tube (hereinafter referred to as COLO-BT™) device, a single use, temporary intraluminal bypass device, intended to reduce contact of fecal content with an anastomotic site, following colorectal surgery (open or laparoscopic)

The goal of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the adherence to DRIP score calculation and the application rate of each proposed item to prevent dehydration and readmission in patients undergoing ileostomy creation after elective colorectal resection different Italian colorectal surgical centers. The primary endpoint is to verifythe application rate of DRIP score calculation and protocol items. Secondary endpoints are 30, 90, and 180-day total and dehydration readmission rates.

This study was planned to examine the effect of non-invasive treatment methods that can be applied to alleviate complications involving gastrointestinal system functions such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and absence of gas/faecal output after colorectal (colon and rectum) cancer surgery. The two main intervention methods of the study were reflexology massage and hot water foot bath. The effects of these methods on reducing postoperative pain and improving gastrointestinal functions will be investigated. The study was planned as a randomised controlled experimental study to determine the effects of reflexology massage and hot water foot bath on postoperative pain and gastrointestinal functions in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. It is thought that the study will provide evidence for determining the appropriate method to reduce pain and improve gastrointestinal functions in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. The population of the study will consist of colorectal cancer patients who will undergo laparoscopic surgical intervention who are admitted to the General Surgery Clinic of SBU Istanbul Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital. Based on the percentage measurement values of the methods to be studied in the literature review, G-POWER programme was used for sample calculation with an effect size of 0.4 (Cohen), 95% power and 0.05% margin of error. Cohen\&#39;s standard effect size was taken as the basis for the effect size. The calculated value is the total value for 3 groups and the total sample size for 3 groups was found as n=102. The number of samples per group was determined as (n)=34. In order to prevent bias in the study, patients who meet the study criteria will be distributed to the experimental and control groups by computerised randomisation programme. Data will be collected by using the Patient Information Form consisting of two parts, Rhodes Nausea, Vomiting and Retching Index and Numerical Proportioning Scale (NRS) developed by the researcher in line with the literature. The data obtained will be evaluated with appropriate statistical methods in the licensed SPSS 21.0 package programme.

The study aims to demonstrate the potential for at-home monitoring using Stream™ Platform, through simulated-use testing. Lay users, defined as subjects or nonprofessional caregivers, will be asked to operate Stream™ Platform. Safety, efficacy, and usability data will be collected to ensure that users are able to comply with prescribed device use. Additionally, clinical testing will be conducted to identify correlations between measurements from Stream™ Platform and standard laboratory, radiological, and clinical assessments used for leak detection as part of the current standard of care (SOC) that may be skipped if the subject is discharged early.