Coronary Arterial Disease Cad

AGENT DCB STANCE is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, 1:1 randomized controlled study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a treatment strategy with the AGENT Drug-Coated Balloon compared to standard of care percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment with drug eluting stent (DES) and/or balloon angioplasty in patients with de novo coronary lesions. Subjects must have a de novo target lesion located in a native coronary artery.

The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a specialized medical device, the Naviscore scoring balloon, in preparing calcified coronary artery narrowings before the implantation of a drug-eluting stent. During percutaneous coronary interventions, the presence of calcified plaques in the heart arteries represents a major challenge because it can prevent stents from expanding fully. When a stent remains under-expanded, it significantly increases the long-term risk of arterial re-narrowing or blood clot formation. To optimize stent expansion, appropriate preparation of the diseased vessel section before stent insertion is a critical phase. This study is a prospective, multi-center randomized trial designed to test the hypothesis that treating calcified coronary lesions with the Naviscore scoring balloon will achieve a better stent expansion and a larger final minimal stent area compared to standard lesion preparation using regular non-compliant balloons. Eligible participants will be randomized in a one-to-one ratio to one of these two lesion preparation strategies. For all included patients, standard drug-eluting stents will be deployed. The study will use intravascular ultrasound imaging to evaluate the final minimum area of the stent directly inside the treated artery at the site of the highest initial calcium burden. Participant health and clinical outcomes will be monitored for up to twelve months following the procedure.

The goal of the OPEN-SAFE registry is to describe the contemporary use and outcomes of SIS-OPN in North America.

The FORWARD CAD IDE Study is a Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) Study conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) System with the Javelin Coronary IVL Catheter for the treatment of calcified, stenotic de novo coronary artery lesions prior to stenting.

The present study is practice-driven and merely observational and prospective. In clinical routine, patients who suffer from suspected ACS and do not show ST elevation in the ECG, different timing proposals in the guidelines and logistically driven differences lead to considerably variable timings in invasive coronary anatomy assessments. This handling may lead to larger infarct sizes when OMI is overseen. Therefore, the present study aims to observe a) whether an AI model is capable of correctly identify OMI in eligible patients and b) if in these patients troponin peak levels vary depending on the elapsed time between OMI diagnosis and coronary intervention. As the model has not been established yet clinically and in the guidelines, it is safe to assume the usual pathway from first medical contact to specialist's attention is undertaken. When a patient presents in an emergency department or places an emergency call, the physicians assess the situation as usal and as stated in the current guidelines1. If no STEMI is confirmed, the NSTE-ACS protocol is started. The patients who are ruled out for ACS are excluded from the final analysis (screening). In this case, the AI model is tested on their ECG in order to assess whether there are false positives. The patients which are in the ACS "rule-in" trail and undergo final coronary angiography will naturally be divided in patients which were classified as OMI and as non-OMI by the AI model. Furthermore, they will present a different "Time from OMI diagnosis to PCI) and variable troponin peak levels. By leveraging this natural variability, a practical distinction and multiple analyses can be done: 1. The feasibility of AI-powered ECG interpretation in the care of patients with suspected ACS and without clear ST-elevation infarction 2. The accuracy of AI-powered ECG interpretation in detecting OMI compared to the classical STEMI criteria 3. How infarct size correlates with different ECG readings by AI and (hypothesis generating) if changing the clinical practice could lead to a benefit in patients with suspected OMI.

Implantation of a metallic drug-eluting stent (DES) is currently the gold standard in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, a DES has several limitations on the long-term, such as chronic local inflammation which may lead to in-stent restenosis, absence of physiological coronary vasomotion and vessel caging which makes future coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) impossible. A bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) is designed to overcome these limitations. The first generation BRS was shown to be clinically inferior to DES due to a slightly higher rate of stent thrombosis. To overcome this problem, several scientific developments have been achieved in the past few years, such as thinner BRS strut construction and improved implantation technique by using PSP (predilatation, sizing, postdilatation) method and intracoronary imaging guidance with optical coherence tomography (OCT) or intravasculair ultrasound (IVUS). A PCI protocol that combines implantation of a second generation thin-strut BRS, mandatory PSP implantation method and mandatory intracoronary imaging-guidance has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate feasibility of a new PCI protocol with implantation of the second generation Meres100 thin-strut BRS combined with a protocolized PSP implantation technique guided by intracoronary imaging.

A prospective, open-label, multi-site, FIH with up to fifteen (n=15) patients to assess the safety and preliminary effectiveness of the AVS Pulse Intravascular Lithotripsy™ System (Pulse IVL™ System) when used for the treatment of coronary artery disease.

The primary aim of this study is to determine rates of patients with optimal platelet reactivity range, defined as PRU levels between 85 and 208, when using a (PFT)-guided titration of cangrelor infusion rate (cangrelor titration) compared to 0.75 mcg/kg/min (standard-dose infusion) for bridging.

Evacuation of pericardial blood by posterior pericardiotomy or use of a posterior pericardial chest tube lowers postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) rates after cardiac surgery by 45-68%. Although it cannot be generalized due to trial undersizing, posterior pericardial chest tube treatment may be a superior alternative to pericardiotomy, given its low risk of procedural complications. This interventional multicenter trial will assess whether prolonged treatment with a posterior pericardial chest tube lowers POAF rates after cardiac surgery. Investigators will randomize 624 patients undergoing routine cardiac surgery at Nordic sites 1:1 to receive a posterior pericardial chest tube as adjunct to standard care for up to 3 postoperative days or standard care alone. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with POAF up to 7 days post-surgery; the study will be powered to detect a relative risk reduction of 30% in the intervention arm. Secondary outcomes are AF burden; days with chest tubes and their output; proportion of patients with POAF up to 14 days post-surgery; direct current conversions during hospital admission; length of ICU/hospital stay; postoperative complications, mortality, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding at 30/90 days and 1/3/5 years; and quality of life/postoperative recovery at 90 days and 1 year. This trial may provide quality clinical evidence supporting the adoption of a simple method to prevent POAF, thus reducing healthcare costs.

The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). The ORBIT-SHOCK pilot study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial initiated by investigators. It will include patients diagnosed with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease presenting calcified nodules (CN), identified by optical coherence tomography (OCT), causing significant angiographic stenosis and eligible for revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo lesion preparation with either orbital atherectomy (OA) or intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). The aim of this pilot trial is to compare PCI outcomes and the incidence of adverse events between both techniques.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Coronary Computed Tomography angiography (CCTA) gained a pivotal clinical role for excellent sensitivity in rule-out CAD, but has limited specificity for a tendency to overestimate stenoses and for the lack of information about their hemodynamic impact. Fractional Flow Reserve derived from CT (FFR-CT) and stress CT perfusion (CTP) have been recently proposed to complement CCTA in the non-invasive assessment of myocardial ischemia, increasing the specificity and avoiding unnecessary catheterization. However, on energy-integrating (EID)-CT, FFR-CT has suboptimal performance, while CTP is affected by high radiation exposure. Both these approaches may benefit by the introduction of the new Photon Counting Detector (PCD)-CT technology, but data completely lacks. Aim of the study is to assess the performance of PCD-CT in the identification of significant CAD combining CCTA with FFR-CT and spectral CTP.

Retrospective analysis of data collected in an institutional database of coronary interventions with use of drug-eluting balloons, with a prospective follow-up for major adverse cardiovascular events and living status.

ICECAP is a multi-centre, prospective, single-arm, interventional, traditional feasibility clinical investigation to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-coronary cryotherapy on vulnerable or high-risk plaque (HRP), using the CryoTherapy System (CTS). The study aims to enroll 25 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, successfully treated for their culprit lesion and with presence of at least one HRP lesion in another vessel. Eligible patients will undergo cryotherapy during a planned procedure. Near-infrared spectrometry (NIRS and Optical Coherence Tomography imaging will be used during baseline procedure, and during a 9 months follow visit. The primary endpoint is reduction of plaque burden measured as 30% reduction in maxLCBI4mm as measured by NIRS at 9 months post procedure.

this trial aimed to evaluate the stent expansion through intravascular imaging (optical coherence tomography (OCT) \& intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)) among individuals underwent different preparation techniques ,then comparing the efficacy and safety of super high-pressure balloon to IVL in severely calcified lesions

Long-term sudden cardiac death (abbreviation: SCAR) focuses on improving the predictability of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease. The aim of the study is to determine the predictive value of measurable biological variables (including genetic factors, cardiac electrical activity, biological markers measured from circulation, and coronary artery anatomy) as well as the patients' psychosocial factors in predicting SCDs. The purpose of this study is the identification of a subgroup of coronary artery disease patients at sufficiently high risk in whom it may be possible to prevent sudden cardiac arrests and subsequent deaths using implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. The study is intended to establish a clear foundation for future interventional studies targeting high-risk coronary artery disease patients. The primary endpoint of the study is SCD/sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or a comparable malignant arrhythmic event (i.e., resuscitation). Secondary endpoints include other major cardiovascular events occurring during the follow-up period (such as cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarctions, revascularizations, and new arrhythmias like atrial fibrillation following procedures or after the patient has been discharged following recruitment) or the occurrence and mortality of other significant life-threatening diseases (such as cancer). Secondary endpoints also include poor success in secondary prevention, which can be assessed through completed medication purchases and the achievement of secondary prevention goals. This observational, prospective study includes collecting multimodal data from hospitals in Finland (TAUH), Israel (HYMC), Moldova (IMSP) and Romania (UMFCD). Each participating institution has followed a process structured by Tampere Heart Hospital (TAUH) for securing permissions in line with EU and national regulations.

This prospective, multicenter, post-market observational study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon (SeQuent® Sirolimus-Coated Balloon) for the treatment of coronary artery disease in routine clinical practice. Consecutive, unselected adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo coronary lesions or in-stent restenosis will be enrolled. The primary objective is to assess target lesion failure at 12 months, defined as the composite of target vessel myocardial infarction or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. Secondary objectives include angiographic procedural success, major adverse cardiovascular events, bleeding outcomes, and longer-term clinical results up to 36 months, as well as outcomes across predefined anatomical and clinical subgroups. The study seeks to answer whether treatment with the crystalline sirolimus-coated balloon provides a safe and effective revascularization strategy in a real-world population with diverse clinical presentations and lesion characteristics.

Rationale: Dual antiplatelet therapy, consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12-inhibitor, reduces the risk of stent-related and non-stent-related ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, this therapy is also associated with a higher risk of bleeding. Given the advances in stent technology and pharmacology, it may be possible to treat patients undergoing PCI with low dose prasugrel as single antiplatelet therapy, regardless of medical history, age or body weight. Objective: Assess the feasibility and safety of a single antiplatelet strategy with a reduced dose of prasugrel 5 mg after PCI in acute and chronic coronary syndrome patients (ACS and CCS). Study design: Open-label, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients undergoing successful PCI due to acute or chronic coronary syndrome. Intervention: A once-daily reduced dose of 5 mg prasugrel for 6 months in CCS patients and for 12 months in ACS patients, preceded by a loading dose of 60 mg prasugrel after PCI, administered without concomitant use of aspirin. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, ischemic stroke, clinically relevant non-major bleeding or major bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3 or 5.

The purpose of this study is to compare the pharmacodynamic effects of ABCD-GENE guided vs. unguided de-escalation strategies among patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and feasibility of the Supira System in heart failure patients with low LVEF, undergoing HRPCI with use of mechanical circulatory support who may benefit from cardiovascular hemodynamic support beyond the PCI procedure.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine the clinical effect of orticumab treatment on inflammation in study participants with prior myocardial infarction who have elevated coronary inflammation based on CCTA. The main question it aims to answer is: Clinical effects of orticumab treatment on inflammation of the coronary artery parameters measured with CCTA Researchers will compare the effects with placebo group after 6 months of treatment Participants will Keep the planned study visit appointments Provide complete information about medical and medical history Speak to the study doctor before changing any of non-study treatments, including starting new medications, receiving any vaccinations, or setting out to join any other clinical studies

Coronary stents are the best treatment method ever accepted in the treatment of coronary artery stenoses. Due to some limitations and complications of stent use, the operators tried to find new solutions. Drug Coated Balloons (DCBs) have been accepted as a new method in the treatment of in-stent restenosis and small vessel disease. Furthermore, they have been used in the treatment of de novo coronary lesions, chronic total occlusions and bifucation lesions. But data is limited in the short and long term success of DCBs in all these clinical scenarios. In our study we aimed to investigate the procedural success and short and long term outcomes of DCB use in different clinical scenarios.

The aim of this trial is to apply shockwaves to the leg wound after saphenous vein harvesting and closure in order to reduce the occurrence of postoperative wound healing complications following coronary artery bypass grafting using venous grafts.

Thrombosis formation is the core mechanism for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease. Antithrombotic therapy is one of the most important treatment methods for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Antithrombotic drugs, while reducing ischemic events, often significantly increase the risk of bleeding. How to balance the risk of recurrent ischemic events and bleeding events in patients with coronary heart disease is a major challenge in the treatment of coronary heart disease. This project establishes a high-quality multicenter, prospective coronary heart disease cohort, with patients covering various clinical characteristics such as different regions, ages, and comorbidities. It verifies the ischemic risk and bleeding risk model developed in Project 1, compares the efficacy improvement of the new model with the traditional risk model, and verifies the effectiveness and stability of the model in different subgroups of the population, and assesses the generalizability of the model in real-world clinical practice, providing high-quality evidence-based basis for the formulation of individualized and precise antithrombotic strategies for coronary heart disease.

Purpose of this study: The purpose of the study is to find out whether using a drug coated balloon in combination with a drug-eluting stent is better than the standard practice of using either device on its own. This study is specifically looking at patients with diabetes who have coronary artery disease. This means that their arteries become restricted or blocked, and these restrictions or blockages are called lesions. The study will look at diabetic patients undergoing treatment for lesions in segments of their coronary arteries that have not previously been treated with stents. These are called 'de novo' lesions. The treatment being investigated: In this study, we are comparing two devices, either used together or on their own to treat coronary artery disease. These devices are commercially available in Europe and carry the mark. This study is being carried out to compare the effectiveness of combining the two devices or using them individually: * Pantera® Lux® Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon, abbreviated Pantera® Lux® (DCB) A drug coated balloon is a balloon which is covered by an anti-proliferative drug. * Orsiro® biodegradable polymer Sirolimus Eluting Stent Orsiro® (DES) A stent is a short, wire mesh tube that acts like a scaffold to keep your artery open. A drug eluting stent is coated with medication that reduces the risk of the artery becoming blocked again. Both drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons are used routinely for the treatment of 'de novo' coronary artery disease in Europe. How will the study be carried out? This study is being conducted in 4 hospitals across Ireland. We aim to recruit 120 participants s in this study. If you agree to participate in this study and sign the informed consent form, you will be asked to participate in the screening process, which will determine if you meet the conditions to participate in the study. You will be "randomised" into one of the 3 study groups. Randomisation means that you are put into a group by chance (similarly to the roll of a dice). Neither you nor your doctor can choose the group you will be in. You will not know which group you were placed in until the end of the study. However, your doctor will know which study group you were placed in. * 40 patients will be treated with Pantera® Lux® (Drug Coated Balloon) only * 40 patients will be treated with Orsiro® (Drug Eluting Stent) only * 40 patients will be treated with a combination of both Pantera® Lux® (Drug Coated Balloon) and Orsiro® (Drug Eluting Stent). If you agree to participate in the study you will be invited to come back for a check-up angiogram 6 months after your procedure to make sure that the treatment has been a success. This is sometimes done in normal clinical practice, but it is not done routinely. You will not be charged for this additional test.

The aim of this clinical trial is to explore the optimal preventative treatment strategy for non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques. The main question it aims to answer is: Can interventional therapy further improve the outcome of non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques on top of optimal pharmacologic therapy? Researchers will randomly assign patients who meet the inclusion criteria to preventative intervention plus optimal drug therapy (experimental group) or optimal drug therapy alone (control group). Participants will: Assigned to the control group: optimized drug therapy consisting of lifestyle improvement and intensive drug therapy including high-dose statin or other therapy to achieve target levels (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol \<1.4 mmol/L and decreased by 50% compared to the baseline). Lifestyle improvement and risk factor management included smoking cessation, nutritional optimization, physical activity, compliance with prescribed medications, and control of diabetes and hypertension. Assigned to the experimental group: all non-flow-limiting vulnerable plaques were treated with conventional second-generation drug-eluting stents. After the procedure, participants received dual antiplatelet therapy for about 12 months as well as other medications in the control group.