Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Cle

The purpose of this global, multicenter, Phase 3 study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enpatoran over 24 weeks in participants with active cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus with or without systemic disease. Study details include: Study Duration: Up to 35 weeks. Treatment Duration: 24 weeks. Visit Frequency: every 4 weeks, with the exception of the Week 2 televisit. Study Intervention Name: Enpatoran, Placebo. Intervention Form: Film-coated tablet.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICP-488 in subjects with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

This is a multi-center, open-label Ph 1b basket study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, biomarker response, and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of S-4321 in adults with autoimmune or immune-mediated disease including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), psoriasis (PsO), cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) with or without systemic manifestations, or atopic dermatitis (AD).

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if VENT-03 works to treat patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) who may or may not have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Another goal is to learn about the safety of VENT-03 and how it is processed by the body. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does VENT-03 affect the activity and severity of CLE? * What side effects do participants have when taking VENT-03? Researchers will compare VENT-03 to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if VENT-03 works to treat patients with CLE. Participants will: * Take VENT-03 or a placebo for 4 weeks, then all participants will switch to VENT-03 for another 8 weeks; * Visit the clinic once a month for checkups and tests.

The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (CLE) database, established in 2006, is a multi-site database between the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW).

The primary objective of this phase Ib study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple-ascending, subcutaneous (SC) doses of HC022 in SLE/CLE subjects. Secondary objectives of study are as follows: To estimate the PK parameters of multiple-ascending SC doses of HC022 in SLE/CLE subjects；To evaluate the immunogenicity of HC022 administered to SLE/CLE subjects.

Summary The Lupus Foundation of America (LFA) Research Accelerated by You (RAY) Registry is a fully remote, longitudinal registry designed to collect data from adults and children living with lupus. The primary goal is to better understand the diagnosis, treatment, care, and quality of life for those affected by the disease. Remote Participation This is a decentralized, online-only registry. Participation is conducted entirely through a secure web-based portal. There are no physical site visits or travel requirements; participants can contribute from any location with internet access. Participation Details Consent: Informed consent is completed electronically. Surveys: Participants complete electronic surveys upon enrollment and every six months thereafter. Data Types: Collected data is self-reported and includes demographics, diagnosis history, treatment information, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life. Purpose and Data Use The LFA uses registry data to: Address Constituent Needs: Inform programs and resources for the lupus community. Advance Research: Share patient insights with to ensure therapies are developed with the consideration of what matters and what matters most to people living with lupus. Patient Engagement and Clinical Research Matching: Participants may be contacted to assess eligibility for patient engagement or clinical research opportunities or to complete specific sub-surveys regarding trial participation.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a heterogeneous inflammatory autoimmune disease associated or not with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Active CLE often cause pain/burning sensation and may lead to permanent visible scars and cicatricial alopecia, with psycho-social consequences/poor quality of life. First-line antimalarials (AMs) are recommended in CLE in addition to topical corticosteroids/tacrolimus with long-term response rate around 50%. Oral glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are recommended in addition to AMs for short term therapy in severe or widespread active CLE lesions. In non-responders to AMs and low-dose oral GCs, i.e., difficult-to-treat CLE, guidelines recommend the add-on of methotrexate as preferential second-line agent, with an overall efficacy of 50% in observational studies. Thalidomide has shown response rate of ≈90% in CLE in a meta-analysis of observational studies and is recommended as a second or third-line agent. However, potential severe adverse events (AEs) including teratogenicity, peripheral neuropathy and thromboembolic events limit its use. Biological therapies including belimumab and anifrolumab, are approved only for patients with associated SLE (and not for those with isolated CLE). Their efficacy has been demonstrated as add-on therapy versus placebo but not versus a comparative drug. Moreover, efficacy of belimumab seems limited in difficult to-treat CLE and has not been assessed using validated tool, as the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity (CLASI) Index. Anifrolumab seems interesting in CLE associated with SLE, but its use is limited by monthly intravenous infusions, high cost and unknown long-term AEs. Moreover, its efficacy in isolated CLE has not been assessed. Lenalidomide is a thalidomide analogue with in vitro 1000 more potent immunomodulatory properties. It is recommended as a third-line treatment in France. With more than 60 treated patients, it showed excellent and rapid efficacy with an absence of drowsiness and peripheral neuropathy with a low-dose regimen of 5 mg/day. The use of lenalidomide was to date limited by its very high cost and its indications were restricted to haematological disorders. For note, the prevention of the higher risk of thromboembolism with lenalidomide requires the daily use of low-dose aspirin. In France, a generic of lenalidomide is now available with a monthly cost of 2 euros, allowing a broad-scale assessment of its efficacy. Finally, lenalidomide might have a better efficacy than methotrexate. We hypothesize that lenalidomide would be more efficacious than methotrexate in difficult-to-treat CLE patients with or without associated SLE. We assume that such trial would not be supported by pharmaceutical companies.