Diabetes Education

In this study, individuals living with diabetes in the Birmingham area will participate in a free, 3-month DSMES program hosted by MedsPLUS Consulting, a local independent pharmacy and wellness center, at a local faith-based organization. DSMES sessions meet twice a month and typically address topics including physical activity, nutrition, coping, and reducing risk and complications. Prior to beginning the program, participants will complete a questionnaire that assesses diabetes self-management behaviors (such as diet, physical activity, and medication adherence) and diabetes knowledge. Additionally, they will participate in a biometric screening where clinical data such as blood A1C, blood pressure, blood cholesterol, and BMI are collected. This data will also be collected again after the completion of the program. In this program, participants will be assigned a community health worker who will contact them outside of scheduled DSMES sessions to provide support. Participants will also be randomly assigned to one of two cohorts, the Traditional cohort and the Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) cohort. The traditional cohort will use paper trackers to track blood pressure and blood sugar outside of DSMES sessions while the RPM cohort will utilize an RPM platform to track this data.

This study is designed to test the preliminary efficacy of a three-stage continuous glucose monitor (CGM) integration program for older adults who are taking insulin. This study will learn if a three-stage CGM integration program ("intervention") that includes sessions focused on CGM technology skills, data skills, and lifestyle skills impacts CGM wear-time, glycemic metrics, and participant-reported outcomes, compared to two standard CGM training approaches ("comparators"). Following a screening visit and baseline data collection, participants will be randomized to either the intervention or one of the two comparator arms for 6 weeks. The intervention involves three educational sessions over 4 weeks. The first session will be in-person and subsequent sessions will be virtual. Participants in the intervention may receive 1-2 additional individualized training sessions to review CGM skills. The first comparator (Comparator A) will receive a one-time clinic-based CGM training. The second comparator (Comparator B) will be provided with a comprehensive informational pamphlet about CGM. All participants will complete outcomes data collection at 6 weeks. The study will also explore participant experiences through a series of semi-structured interviews with a subset of purposively selected participants and their care partners to identify opportunities for scaling the intervention to a broader population. An extension phase of the study will evaluate long-term CGM use and associated outcomes 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Lastly, we will run an additional small sub-study where consented care partners of participants will attend the intervention or comparator sessions alongside the study participant and provide care partner-specific data.

Background. Approximately 80% of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) or arterial hypertension (HTN) do not achieve adequate disease control. Objective. To evaluate the feasibility of a research study assessing the impact of an educational and nursing counseling intervention with a person-centered care (PCC) approach to improve adherence and control in patients with arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus in Colombia. Methods. A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted. Adults with DM or HTN enrolled in cardiovascular or metabolic risk programs will be included. A total of 100-200 patients is expected to be recruited. The intervention group will receive counseling and education tailored to their preferences following the PCC approach, while the control group will receive standard care according to the program they belong to. Follow-up will last 6 months, and the primary outcomes to be measured in both groups are: medication adherence, DM control (HbA1c at target levels, change in HbA1c), and HTN control (SBP and DBP at target levels, changes in SBP and DBP). Results. The findings of this study will provide insight into the feasibility of conducting larger-scale studies to evaluate the effectiveness of PCC-based interventions in Colombia.

Type 2 diabetes is common in primary care, and daily self-care behaviors are essential for achieving blood sugar targets. This randomized, two-arm clinical trial will evaluate whether a structured narrative education program added to usual diabetes care improves glycemic control compared with usual care alone in adults with type 2 diabetes. Eligible participants (age ≥18 years) with suboptimal glycemic control (HbA1c ≥7.0% in the last 3 months) will be randomized 1:1 to either standard care or standard care plus narrative education. The narrative education program will be delivered by a family physician over 3 months and includes two individual face-to-face sessions (approximately 20-30 minutes) at Day 0 and Day 15 and four brief telephone reinforcement calls (approximately 3-5 minutes) on Days 30, 45, 60, and 75. The primary outcome is the absolute change in HbA1c from baseline (Day 0) to Day 90. Secondary outcomes include changes in diabetes self-care activities (SDSCA-TR), diabetes-related distress (PAID-5-TR), and body mass index (BMI) from Day 0 to Day 90.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a WhatsApp-based and family-involved self-management education program on self-management, family support, and HbA1c levels among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Hypotheses: * H1: There will be a significant difference in self-management scores between the intervention group receiving the WhatsApp-based and family-involved self-management education and the control group. * H2: There will be a significant difference in HbA1c levels between the intervention group receiving the WhatsApp-based and family-involved self-management education and the control group. * H3: There will be a significant difference in family support scores between the intervention group receiving the WhatsApp-based and family-involved self-management education and the control group. This randomized controlled trial will be conducted with 44 individuals diagnosed with T2DM who meet the inclusion criteria and one family member per participant (total 88 participants). Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group using a computer-generated randomization list. Participants (people with diabetes and their family members) in the intervention group will receive a 12-week, WhatsApp-based self-management education program. Educational modules (videos, visuals, and written materials) will be shared separately with each person with diabetes and their participating family member via WhatsApp twice a week. To reinforce learning, a five-question quiz will be sent separately to both the person with diabetes and the family member every Thursday. In addition, a brief follow-up phone call (approximately 10 minutes) will be conducted once a week only with the person with diabetes to review progress and provide feedback. Data collection will occur at baseline and at the end of the 12th week. Participants in the control group will continue their routine outpatient follow-ups for three months and complete the same measurement tools at baseline and post-intervention. Data will be collected using the Diabetic Participant Demographic Form, Family Member Demographic Form, Diabetes Self Management Questionnaire, Hensarling's Diabetes Family Support Scale, and the Diabetes Knowledge Scale for Adults. Statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS software. Group comparisons will be analyzed with independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests, and pre-post comparisons with paired t-tests or Wilcoxon tests. A significance level of p\<0.05 will be used.

This study is designed to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a continuous glucose monitor (CGM)-augmented food is medicine (FIM) intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes and nutrition or food insecurity. This study will learn if a FIM intervention ("intervention") that includes access to real-time CGM and nutrition counseling can increase engagement, improve glycemic management, and support healthy eating in this population, compared to the FIM intervention alone ("comparator"). At the study baseline, participants will be randomized to either the intervention or the comparator arm for 16 weeks. The intervention will occur during the first 12 weeks (phase 1: intervention phase) and will be compared to a standard FIM approach without CGM or counseling. Phase 2 (extension phase) will last 4 weeks and will consist of all participants in the intervention and comparator arm receiving both FIM and CGM for self-directed use. The study will also explore participant experiences through a series of semi-structured interviews with a subset of randomly selected participants to identify opportunities for scaling the intervention to a broader population.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the use and effectiveness of a mobile web application (app) that is designed to educate and allow patients to manage diabetes and make sustainable lifestyle changes, and to study the impact of the app on clinical outcomes of diabetes (HA1C) and educational outcomes (Self-Efficacy for Diabetes Scale). The main question to answer is: Does the use of the Diabetes Application significantly affect clinical outcomes of diabetes and cardiometabolic risk factors (BMI and Blood Pressure)? Patients will be enrolled in one of two available arms of the study. Participants in the 'intervention arm' will use the app to view educational information presented as videos in the following areas: Healthy Coping, Healthy Eating, Staying Active, Medications (Use and Safety), Problem Solving in Diabetes and Disease Pathophysiology. They will continue routine follow-up care with their primary care physicians during the study. Participants in the 'control arm' will continue with their primary care physician in routine follow-up care, as normally scheduled. Researchers will compare the intervention arm participants to the control arm participants to find out about and compare changes in HA1C, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index. Groups will also be compared on the basis of self-perceived confidence of managing their diabetes by way of the Diabetes Self Efficacy Scale.

Children diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) initially receive intensive education with their families. Studies indicate that over time, this initial education becomes routine, reducing its effectiveness and failing to adequately address developmental stages, thus requiring repetition. Current methods involve long and intensive educational sessions in hospitals using the Childhood Diabetes Education Guide. These extended, non-interactive sessions often lead to a loss of motivation, decreased learning efficiency, and negative attitudes among patients and their families. This study aims to develop an educational tool utilizing the Kamishibai method specifically for children with T1DM aged 8-12. The Kamishibai method is designed to align with their cognitive and sensory development, promoting effective and engaging learning experiences for diabetic patients. By incorporating interactive and visually stimulating elements, Kamishibai seeks to enhance motivation and retention of diabetes education. Hypothesis 1: Children diagnosed with Type 1 DM have higher knowledge levels in the group educated with the Kamishibai method compared to those receiving routine education. Hypothesis 2: The Hemoglobin A1c parameter is lower in the Kamishibai-educated group. Hypothesis 3: The quality of life is higher in the Kamishibai-educated group. This study will assess the effectiveness of the Kamishibai method by comparing it to routine educational approaches. The detailed protocol includes technical aspects of the intervention, measurement tools, data collection methods, and statistical analysis plans to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the method's impact on knowledge levels, HbA1c parameters, and quality of life.