End Of Life

The aims of this study are to (1) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ROCKS intervention among patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers through a randomized controlled trial in a cancer center setting; (2) evaluate the preliminary efficacy of ROCKS, as compared to usual care, on changes in completion of advance directives; and (3) explore the dyadic effects of resilience on self-efficacy, optimism, dyadic communication and coping, anxiety, and depression using an actor-partner interdependence model.

The palliative care education in assisted living for dementia care providers (PCEAL-DCP) is a 4-week intervention (once a week for 1.5 hours, a total of 6 hours) for licensed nurses, administrators and dementia care coordinators to improve quality of dementia care outcomes

This cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial compares a technology-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach with a redesigned team-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach.

Patient-centered medical care considers a patient's values and goals for their health and well-being. Healthcare providers use this information to formulate a medical care plan that is aligned with these expectations. This shared-decision making process should occur with every medical decision, but it is especially important whenever decisions about end-of-life care are being considered. Eliciting patient preferences about resuscitation and life-support treatments in the event of life-threatening illnesses are considered to be a standard of excellent and appropriate medical care. Unfortunately, these discussions don't happen consistently and even when they do occur, are rarely ideal. The consequences can be devastating, often resulting in the delivery of unwanted medical care that can be associated with significant physical and mental suffering among patients and their families. In response to this problem, the investigators developed a novel tool to help guide these difficult conversations between healthcare providers and patients. The investigators previously tested this tool in a small group of hospitalized patients who found it acceptable and helpful. In this larger study, the investigators will compare how effective this tool is compared to usual care in ensuring hospitalized patients have their treatment preferences identified, documented and result in end-of-life care that is consistent with their preferences.

80% of patients wish to die at home. The number of deaths will increase in the coming years due to the aging population. The general practitioner (GP) is at the center of this care. Despite national plans for the development of palliative care, dying at home remains complicated. The difficulties described and known are organizational (workload) and linked to the doctor's experience with the suffering of the patient and their family. Many studies have been conducted in hospital settings, and the solutions developed are often not very accessible to GP. Conducting a study on this subject will allow us to take stock of this outpatient care provided by general practitioners following numerous changes that have occurred in recent years, both in terms of palliative care teaching and in terms of modifications to the care offered.

I this qualitative study, Investigators will conduct semi-structured interviews with clinicians that are involved in the care of patients with breast cancer to evaluate the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility/usability of a metastatic breast cancer-specific prognostic tool. These interviews will be conducted by the UNC CHAI Core and will continue until thematic saturation (estimated 10 participants). The investigators will code the qualitative data using emerging themes, guided by a well-established implementation science theory, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The information gained from these studies will inform an implementation approach to increase the usability and acceptability of a novel prognostic tool to assist oncologists in the prognosis of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Death is a daily reality in the emergency department. Deaths represent 0.3 to 0.5% of emergency admissions, i.e. approximately 26,000 per year for the whole of France. For 80% of these deceased patients, a decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments was made in the emergency departments. The announcement of death and decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in this context is complex because of the lack of time and the inappropriate places for the announcement. In addition, the short delay in the occurrence of these events may increase the stress and anxiety of families who are unprepared for the announcement. However, there is little data in the literature on the impact on families in terms of their experience of announcements in the emergency context. It has been established that symptoms of anxiety and depression are correlated with the onset of posttraumatic stress disorder and that the latter is more important in the families of deceased patients and after a decision to undergo decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care unit. In order to identify it, several tools have been developed, including the Impact Event Scale (IES), which has been widely used to detect symptoms related to PTSD. It has also been shown that training nursing staff in communication skills or the use of written support in dealing with the families of patients who have died in intensive care reduces the appearance of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Human simulation is a pedagogical technique for learning interpersonal skills through role playing. It is used, among other things, in announcement situations in medicine. Nevertheless, its impact in emergency medicine has not been evaluated. Moreover, it has been shown that the involvement of the patient-partner in the care process must be improved and encouraged and that its impact has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, the objective is to evaluate the impact of a model protocol for announcing decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments, with human simulation and the intervention of partner families in a simulation center and in situ, on the reduction of family stress following the announcement of a decision of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in the emergency departments. Hypothesis is that training all emergency department caregivers in the use of a model announcement protocol with the support of human simulation, combining training of pairs in a simulation center and in situ training, and the participation of partner families, would allow for a better understanding of announce of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments decision in the emergency department and reduce their impact on families in terms of the occurrence of acute stress and post-traumatic stress symptoms.

The goal of this study is to investigate whether embedding a hospice and palliative care practitioner within a medical intensive care unit will improve patient outcomes and healthcare usage. The practitioner will work solely within the medical intensive care units and offer timely as well as proactive consultations based on clinical criteria and estimated mortality risk. The study team will compare patients seen by the practitioner to patients in an adjacent ICU and historical patients to determine whether patient care is improved by this intervention.