[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"enterocele\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:enterocele":87},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,56],{"id":9,"slug":4,"hasResults":10,"nctId":11,"briefTitle":12,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":14,"eligibilityCriteria":15,"healthyVolunteers":10,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":37,"overallStatus":43,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":44,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":45,"startDateStruct":48,"completionDateStruct":50,"leadSponsor":52,"locationsCount":55},"100549201",false,"NCT06430931","Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery","Biological OviTex Versus Synthetic Graft in Robotic Prolapse Surgery: a Multicentre, Phase 11-111, Partially Randomised Patient Preference Trial","ProTex","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Indication for VMR or SCR set by the treating surgeon\u002Fgynecologist in accordance to the current guidelines on rectal and pelvic prolapse;\n* Counselled for therapeutic options and given informed consent for VMR or SCR;\n* Counselled for different types of mesh (OviTex or Prolene) and randomisation;\n* Written informed consent for randomisation, OviTex implant or Prolene;\n* Written informed consent for observational data collection.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Mentally incompetent patients (unable to fulfil questionnaires).\n* Allergy to ovine rumen.\n* A medical history of pelvic radiation therapy.\n* Scheduled for a redo-rectopexy.\n* A medical history of previously implanted pelvic floor meshes or native tissue.\n* Language barrier","ALL","18 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},184,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","This prospective study aims to assess the efficacy of the OviTex 1S permanent mesh in pelvic floor surgery in comparison with the current standard polypropylene mesh.",[26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36],"Colorectal Disorders","Prolapse","Prolapse Rectal","Prolapse Genital","Prolapse Pelvic","Rectocele","Prolapse Uterus","Cystocele","Enterocele","Prolapse Bladder","Prolapse; Cervix",[27,38,39,40,41,42],"Abdominal prolapse Surgery","Biological mesh","OviTex","VMR","sacrocolporectopexy","RECRUITING","2025-12-31",{"date":46,"type":47},"2026-01-02","ACTUAL",{"date":49,"type":47},"2023-12-06",{"date":51,"type":20},"2027-07-01",{"name":53,"class":54},"Meander Medical Center","OTHER",1,{"id":57,"slug":4,"hasResults":10,"nctId":58,"briefTitle":59,"officialTitle":59,"acronym":60,"eligibilityCriteria":61,"healthyVolunteers":10,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":62,"targetDuration":64,"studyType":65,"phases":4,"briefSummary":66,"conditions":67,"keywords":72,"overallStatus":43,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":77,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":78,"startDateStruct":80,"completionDateStruct":82,"leadSponsor":84,"locationsCount":86},"100509817","NCT05918367","Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative","M2R2","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Diagnosis of posterior pelvic organ prolaps planned for laparoscopie or robotic ventral mesh rectopexy with or without concomittant surgery.\n* All patients 18 years or older and are able to complete a written informed conscent are eligble for inclusion.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n1. Inability to complete a written informed conscent\n2. Pregnant women\n3. No email adress available to send the questionnaires to\n4. Language barrier or impossiblity to fill in the questionnaires (at the discretion oft he treating physician)",{"count":63,"type":20},200,"5 Years","OBSERVATIONAL","The goal of this multicenter observational study is to collect data prospectively of patients with pelvic organ prolapse undergoing ventral mesh rectopexy (as well as rectoceles, entero-\u002Fsigmoidoceles\u002F intussusception\u002F rectal prolapse or combined) by laparoscopy or robotic surgery and to evaluate the longterm functional outcomes.\n\nSecondly complications (mesh erosions, recurrence, reoperations) are evaluated.\n\nFollowing main questions will be analysed - other can follow in consultation with the collaborative\n\n1. Is VMR the technique of choice for treatment of rectoceles? Functional results - recurrence - mesh related complications\n2. Has a perineal descent an impact on the functional outcome of ventral mesh rectopexy perfored for external rectal prolaps, internal rectal prolaps, rectocele, enterocele, sigmoidcele or combined pelvic organ prolapse?",[68,31,34,69,70,71],"Pelvic Organ Prolapse","Rectal Prolapse","Descending Perineum Syndrome","Surgery",[73,74,75,76],"Posterior pelvic organ prolapse","descending perineum","ventral mesh rectopexy","functional outcome","2023-10-23",{"date":79,"type":47},"2023-10-25",{"date":81,"type":47},"2023-09-25",{"date":83,"type":20},"2032-09-30",{"name":85,"class":54},"University Hospital, Antwerp",5,""]