Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

This multicenter randomized controlled trial compare two transfusion strategies of red blood cells transfusion in patients supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock. An individualized transfusion strategy based on ScVO2 level, is compared to a conventionnal strategy based on predefined hemoglobin threshold. The primary endpoint is the consumption of packed red blod cells, secondary endpoints are subgroup analysis, mortality, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness

While mechanical ventilation can be used to sustain life in those with lung injury, it, can further worsen lung injury or prevent lung healing resulting in high morbidity and mortality as seen in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), the highest level of life support also known as the heart-lung machine, investigators may minimize injury from mechanical ventilation to allow the lungs to heal; however, the optimal ventilator strategies while on ECMO are unknown. This study will evaluate personalized ventilator strategy compared to standard of care ventilation.

Sedation (painkillers and sedative drugs) treats pain, reduces suffering, and helps patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remain comfortable. ECMO is a life support machine that provides oxygen and removes waste gases (carbon dioxide) in very sick patients with severe heart or lung failure. About 300-400 patients per year receive ECMO in the UK. These patients are younger and generally more healthy compared to other critically ill patients. However patients that survive ECMO have long-term health problems. These include anxiety, memory problems, withdrawal from medicines, and mobility issues. These problems issues could all be related to the type and amount of sedation given. A sedation protocol is a way of guiding healthcare professionals how much sedation is given to patients in ICU. Too much sedation can cause confusion, hallucinations, excessive sleepiness, and longer time in hospital. Too little sedation can cause pain, distress, and also a longer time in hospital. Using a sedation protocol in non-ECMO patients has been shown to reduce these complications. However, there are no protocols for giving sedation to ECMO patients in research papers. Investigators know healthcare staff find it difficult to manage sedation, and higher amounts of sedation is given to ECMO patients. Aims: To see whether it is possible to run a trial that compares using a sedation protocol against usual care. Design/methods: Thirty to 60 ECMO patients will be chosen and will be put into one of two groups. One group will receive usual care, and the other will receive care using the sedation protocol. The investigators will collect information from both groups to find out if the study design works and how many patients agree to take part. Patient and public involvement/engagement: The investigators received feedback from patients and family member participants which helped to design this proposal, the lay summary and what to measure in a trial. They will advise how the investigators should review study findings, and support sharing of results to the public. Impact/dissemination: The investigators will share findings through social media, patient charities, research papers and conferences.

It is a cross-sectional study to summarize the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation （ECMO）treatment in children in China.

In ECPR, where CPR times often range from 30 to 120 minutes, only patients with good circulation during CPR survive, while non-survivors commonly suffer from anoxic brain injury. The selection process during CPR is challenging causing a general survival rate of just 2 out of 10, and the urgent need for better selection criteria has been emphasized. It it crucial to keep cardiac arrest times as short as possible, pre primed-ECMO can facilitate this. The ECMO treatment and the long CPR times of ECPR can also affect the measurements of the neurologic prognostication guidelines after cardiac arrest, making its validity uncertain in this specific cohort. Further, the long-term neuropsychological follow-up is limited to a few patients, making it uncertain if ECPR gives the survivors good long-term life satisfaction or just a prolonged life. Our overall aim is to optimize and improve the care pathway for ECPR patients by refining patient selection, assessing pre-primed ECMO, validating neurological prognostication guidelines, and understanding long-term outcomes and challenges faced by survivors. Specific Aim 1: Evaluating predictors for good neurological outcomes in ECPR and to develop and validate (internally and externally) an evidence-based selection tool for ECPR. Specific aim 2: To assess the sterility and function of pre-primed ECMO. Specific aim 3: To evaluate the applicability of current guidelines for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest in ECPR patients, and to assess the predictive value of individual and combined neurological tests in this specific patient population. Specific aim 4: To determine the long-term neuropsychological outcomes, identify the problems survivors experience in daily life, and assess life satisfaction - by comprehensive follow-up visits with validated questionnaires and neuropsychology testing up to 12 years after the ECMO-treated cardiac arrest.

ASCEND researchers are partnering with families of children who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) after a sudden failure of breathing named pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS). ECMO is a life support technology that uses an artificial lung outside of the body to do the lung's work. ASCEND has two objectives. The first objective is to learn more about children's abilities and quality of life among ECMO-supported children in the year after they leave the pediatric intensive care unit. The second objective is to compare short and long-term patient outcomes in two groups of children: one group managed with a mechanical ventilation protocol that reserves the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) until protocol failure to another group supported on ECMO per usual care.

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a salvage treatment for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). With the large-scale implementation of VV-ECMO in critical care medicine departments in China, significant progress has been made in treating severe ARDS. However, the patient mortality rate remains high. The pathophysiological essence of ARDS is an imbalance between the body's oxygen supply and demand, causing tissue and cell hypoxia, organ dysfunction, and even death. The VV-ECMO treatment process still requires mechanical ventilation assistance. However, inappropriate mechanical ventilation settings can lead to ventilator-related lung injury (VILI). In recent years, mechanical power has gradually attracted everyone's attention and is considered the cause of VILI. The transpulmonary mechanical power is more accurate to the energy directly performed to the lung tissue. Transpulmonary mechanical energy has a specific value in judging the prognosis of mechanically ventilated patients, but its clinical significance in treating patients with VV-ECMO is unclear. This study aimed to explore the value of transpulmonary mechanical power in predicting the prognosis of patients with severe ARDS patients treated with VV-ECMO.

The purpose of this project is to test the feasibility and safety of inhaled hydrogen gas (H2) administration as a rescue therapy during cardiac arrest requiring extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR, i.e. mechanical circulatory support). Under exemption from informed consent, patients undergoing refractory cardiac arrest in the cardiac ICU at a participating center will be randomized to standard therapy with or without the administration of 2% hydrogen in gases administered via the ventilator and ECMO membrane for 72 hours.

Over the last 20 years, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used to support adult patients with respiratory or cardiac failure who are unlikely to survive conventional treatment methods. ECMO circuit, pump, and oxygenator technology improvements permit safer perfusion for extended periods. The prolonged use of an ECMO circuit increases the risk of membrane lung (ML) dysfunction. The ML is responsible for taking in oxygen and removing carbon dioxide. The non-biologic surface of the ML triggers inflammatory and coagulation pathways, resulting in the formation of blood clots, breakdown of fibrin, and activation of white blood cells, which ultimately leads to ML dysfunction. Coagulation and fibrinolysis activation can cause systemic coagulopathy or hemolysis, and the deposition of blood clots can block blood flow. Moreover, the accumulation of moisture in the gas phase and the buildup of protein and cellular debris in the blood phase may contribute to shunt and dead-space physiology, respectively, impairing the exchange of gases. These three categories-hematologic abnormalities, mechanical obstruction, and inadequate gas exchange-account for most ML exchanges. Worsening oxygenation during ECMO should prompt quantification of oxygen transfer. ML exchange is indicated when the ML can no longer meet the patient's oxygen demand. The partial pressure of Post-ML arterial oxygen less than 200 mmHg is the most important consideration in this decision. In some high-altitude regions of China, ECMO treatment is also routinely conducted. The experiences above are derived from low-altitude areas, and whether they apply in high-altitude regions is still being determined. This study aimed to explore the significantly lower membrane lung oxygen uptake in high-altitude regions compared to low-altitude areas.

Rationale: In patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is very common. This is possibly due to the application of liberal thresholds and the lack of evidence-based guidelines. Although RBC transfusion can be lifesaving, it is also a risk-bearing intervention with substantial risk for morbidity and mortality in this critically ill population. Also, with increasing scarcity, RBC transfusions are becoming more expensive. Furthermore, in the past decades it has been shown in several critically ill patient populations - not on ECMO - that maintaining a restrictive hemoglobin (Hb) threshold for RBC transfusion is non-inferior, including in cardiothoracic surgery, acute myocardial infarction and septic shock. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that a restrictive transfusion threshold for RBC is safe to apply in patients on ECMO in comparison with a liberal transfusion threshold. Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to study in a prospective randomized comparison whether a restrictive RBC transfusions strategy is non-inferior compared to a liberal strategy in patients on ECMO with respect to 90-day mortality. Study design: Prospective multi-center randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Study population: Patients, 18 years or older, receiving ECMO. Intervention: Restrictive RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 7.0 g/dL (4.3 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. The aimed Hb target range of the restrictive/intervention group will be 7.1 - 9.0 g/dL (4.3 - 5.6 mmol/L). Liberal RBC transfusion threshold: in case the Hb transfusion trigger of 9.0 g/dL (5.6 mmol/L) is reached, 1 RBC unit at a time will be transfused. Target range of the liberal group is defined as Hb 9.1 - 11.0 g/dL Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter is 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes include: 1) proportion of patients on ECMO exposed to allogeneic RBC transfusion; 2) RBC volume infused per patient during ECMO; 3) reasons for RBC transfusion other than Hb triggers; 4) transfusion reactions; 5) time on ECMO; 6) length of hospital- and ICU-stay; 7) in-ICU morbidity; 8) quality of life (QoL), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) and Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; 9) costs related to a) transfusion, b) hospital admission and c) transfusion-related sequelae.

The study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of the Synchronized Cardiac Support treatment wit the icor kit and the Xenios console with modified sensor box ECG and Software Version 3.2.4

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the association between vasopressor exposure levels and outcomes in adults with cardiogenic shock receiving VA-ECMO. The main question it aims to answer is: Does reduced exposure to vasopressors lower the 30-day mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock when receiving ECMO support? Participants who are receiving ECMO support for cardiogenic shock as part of their regular medical care will have their data collected, including information about their vasopressor use and mortality outcomes, over the course of the study.

The OSIRIS trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, multinational, open-label, randomized controlled trial with a 2:1 concealed allocation of refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) based approach versus the conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) approach.

Blood which recirculates through the circuit of a veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-V ECMO) does not contribute to the systemic oxygenation of a patient on V-V ECMO and is called the recirculation fraction (Rf). Theoretically, the optimization of ECMO blood flow is possible using Rf measurements. A prospective, observational study will be performed measuring the Rf of total ECMO blood flow in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on V-V ECMO with an ultrasound dilution technique. ECMO blood flow will be optimized by reducing ECMO blood flow in accordance with the measured Rf as long as systemic oxygenation is not compromised.

This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm, randomized multicenter trial to identify whether immediate multi-vessel PCI would be better in clinical outcomes compared with culprit lesion-only PCI for AMI and multi-vessel disease with an advanced form of CS patients who require veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO).

To determine whether a strategy of adding venovenous ECMO to mechanical ventilation, as compared to mechanical ventilation alone, increases the number of intensive care free days at day 60, in patients with moderate to severe acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

The purpose of this study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of hydromorphone in patients under ECMO, and to recommend a dosing regimen when the target effective concentration was reached.

In 2023, the second Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC-2) updated the diagnostic and management guidelines for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PARDS). The guidelines do not provide sufficient evidence-based recommendations on whether prone positioning ventilation is necessary for severe PARDS patients. However, the effectiveness of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in treating severe PARDS has been fluctuating around 70% according to recent data from Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). In 2018, the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) study group conducted a retrospective analysis and concluded that ECMO does not significantly improve survival rates for severe PARDS. However, this retrospective study mainly focused on data from North America, with significant variations in annual ECMO support cases among different centers, which may introduce bias. With advancements in ECMO technology and materials, ECMO has become safer and easier to operate. In recent years, pediatric ECMO support technology has rapidly grown in mainland China and is increasingly being widely used domestically to rescue more children promptly. ECMO can also serve as a salvage measure for severely ARDS children who have failed conventional mechanical ventilation treatment. When optimizing ventilator parameters (titrating positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels, neuromuscular blockers, prone positioning), strict fluid management alone cannot maintain satisfactory oxygenation (P/F\<80mmHg or Oxygen Index (OI) \>40 for over 4 hours or OI \>20 for over 24 hours), initiating ECMO can achieve lung-protective ventilation strategies with ultra-low tidal volumes to minimize ventilator-associated lung injury.

The availability as well as the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) systems for severe acute respiratory or cardiocirculatory failure is steadily increasing. The decision to initiate ECMO therapy is predominantly made in emergency situations, for which the focus is on acute survival. The decisions if a patient will profit from ECMO therapy are mainly made from clinical experience and educated guess by the attending team. However, it is unknown how useful these clinical predictions are. Therefore, this observational study will compare estimated and real outcome of ECMO patients.