Mastectomy Lymphedema

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the erector spinae block can reduce the incidence of chronic pain compared to the paravertebral block in adult patients undergoing total mastectomy. The study includes patients aged 18 to 80 years scheduled for mastectomy, with or without axillary dissection. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does erector spinae block reduce the incidence of chronic pain at 3 months after mastectomy compared to paravertebral block? * Does erector spinae block affect postoperative outcomes such as opioid consumption at 48 hours, pain scores (in PACU, 24 and 48 hours), block performance time, and the incidence of complications, anxiety or depression, and pain intensity at 3 months? Researchers will compare patients receiving erector spinae block to those receiving paravertebral block to determine if erector spinae block provides equivalent or improved outcomes in terms of chronic pain and perioperative measures. Participants will: * Be randomly assigned to receive either erector spinae block or paravertebral block prior to surgery * Undergo total mastectomy (with or without axillary dissection) * Have their pain assessed in the PACU and at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively * Have opioid consumption measured during the first 48 hours after surgery * Be followed up at 3 months to assess chronic pain, pain intensity, and psychological outcomes (anxiety or depression)

The purpose of the study is to determine the recurrence rates and survival of patients with clinical T1-2N0 ER+/Her2- invasive breast cancer who have biopsy proven image detected nodal disease treated with upfront lumpectomy or mastectomy with TAD followed by adjuvant therapy. This is a prospective, single arm phase II clinical trial. Patients will be screened and enrolled per eligibility criteria. Patient, tumor, and treatment data will be documented.

Chronic pain after Mastectomy is frequent and an important healthcare priority because of its effect on quality of life. Although the association between the severity of acute pain after surgery and the likelihood of chronic pain is known, their causal relationship has not been clarified. Mastectomy, frequently done for the management of breast cancer, is associated with significant acute postoperative pain and limited shoulder movement.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of a structured self-affirmation intervention on pain, depression, anxiety, and stress levels in patients undergoing mastectomy. The study will be conducted in two parallel groups, with the intervention group listening to an audio recording of positive self-affirmation statements. Primary outcomes will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). The goal is to provide evidence-based strategies to reduce psychosocial burden after mastectomy.

The purpose this research is to compare two different standards of care for pain management and two different standards of care for local numbing medicine for breast cancer patients who will have a total mastectomy.

This is a response-adaptive (RAR) prospective randomized study with a long-term follow-up and the aim of this clinical study is to measure with qualitative and quantitative indicators the changes in cosmetic results, quality of life and patient satisfaction after breast reconstructive surgery with silicone implant (following SSM, ASM or NSM mastectomy) and symmetrization (mastopexy and/or silicone implant and/or Ultrapro mesh sling technique) over time. According to the hypothesis of the study, the results of implant-based breast reconstruction and symmetrization following advanced postmastectomy techniques significantly decrease over time and later results limited patient satisfaction rate. This is mainly due to the fact that over time, the natural breast differs from the reconstructed breast with silicone implant. Because of the different biological properties (gravity results ptosis on breast with mastopexy, significant volume increasement of the breast with mastopexy due to endocrine therapy, gradually progressive capsular contracture on the tumorous side, nipple flattening, nipple tattoo fading etc.) the two sides change differently resulting in significant asymmetry and consequently could lead to decreased patient satisfaction. The high degree of asymmetry over time (which can be similar to the difference between the result of a simple mastectomy and natural breast (control group)), may indicates additional surgeries or usage of medical devices, putting a financial burden on the patient and the health system. On the other hand, the symmetry can be achieved with bilateral skin-sparing mastectomies and implant-based immediate or delayed-immediate reconstructions is clearly better and change less with time. The mastectomy of the contralateral disease-free side is considered as an unreasonable burden for moderate risk patients. The information such as the need for multiple surgeries, change in symmetry over time etc., should be an important part of the professional decision-making mechanism and the surgeon should inform the patient during the primer surgery. Nowadays due to the lack of evidence-based knowledge, it is not part of the patient's information and surgical planning internationally. Planning breast units, attention, capacity and financial resources must also be provided to meet the long-term needs of patients who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Simple mastectomy with an external prosthesis can be an alternative for patients with intolerable degree of asymmetry or on the contrary, the results may justify the need for bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction even in the absence of high oncological risk and for purely symmetrical and cosmetic reasons.

This is a response-adaptive (RAR) prospective randomized study with a long-term follow-up and the aim of this clinical study is to measure with qualitative and quantitative indicators the changes in cosmetic results, quality of life and patient satisfaction after delayed- immediate breast reconstruction with standardized technique Skin Reducing Nipple sparing mastectomy, SRNSM and SSM with standardized horizontal skin incision. According to our hypothesis, SRNSM with standardized technique on pendulous/ ptotic breasts is a safe procedure compared to SSM. It also promotes the cosmetic efficacy of SRNSM with the removal of the entire glandular tissue through avoidance of the reduction of projection, the need later nipple reconstruction surgery and of areola tattoo. In our study we propose that compared to one of the well-known and widely investigated studied SSM, our current standardized SRNSM technique is able to perform similar oncologically safe entire gland tissue removal, with low complication rate, accommodating for adjuvant treatments. Furthermore, it may provide superior cosmetic results than SSM (NAC is not removed, projection is maintained, and there is no need for further nipple reconstruction or tattoo) with high patient satisfaction which is maintained long term.