Myofacial Pain

This study is being done to better understand and improve treatment for myofascial pelvic pain, a common cause of long-lasting pelvic pain in women. Myofascial pelvic pain is related to tight or dysfunctional pelvic floor muscles and can cause pain as well as bladder, bowel, and sexual problems. Current clinical evaluations mostly rely on physical examination and patient-reported symptoms and do not fully measure how the pelvic floor muscles are functioning. The purpose of this study is to measure pelvic floor muscle function using a noninvasive imaging method called near-infrared spectroscopy, or NIRS. This method measures changes in muscle blood flow and oxygen levels during muscle contraction and relaxation. The study will examine whether pelvic floor muscle function improves after different treatments and whether these physiologic changes are associated with improvements in pain and symptoms. The study will enroll 120 adult women who have had pelvic pain for at least three months and have pelvic floor muscle tenderness on examination. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: education with relaxation exercises, pelvic floor physical therapy focused on myofascial release, or vaginal medication used to help relax pelvic floor muscles. Participants will take part in four study visits over a six-month period. During these visits, they will complete questionnaires about pain and pelvic symptoms, undergo pelvic floor examinations, and have pelvic floor muscle imaging using the NIRS device while performing brief muscle contractions and relaxations. Some visits will also include collection of blood, urine, and vaginal samples to measure inflammation. The information gained from this study may help improve the diagnosis and treatment of myofascial pelvic pain by providing objective measures of pelvic floor muscle function and identifying which treatments are most effective for different patients.

This study aims to evaluate whether intramuscular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are more effective than isotonic saline in reducing pain and improving jaw function in individuals diagnosed with myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Myogenous TMD is a common source of orofacial muscle pain and functional limitation, and although conservative treatments help many patients, a significant proportion continue to experience persistent symptoms that affect daily life and quality of function. PRP is an autologous, minimally invasive biologic concentrate enriched with platelets and bioactive molecules that may promote tissue repair and modulate inflammation, making it a promising option for managing muscle-related pain conditions. However, evidence from well-controlled randomized clinical trials in myogenous TMD remains limited. In this double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial, participants will receive two intramuscular injections-either PRP or saline-administered one month apart. Follow-up assessments will occur at 1, 3, and 6 months using standardized and validated measures of pain intensity, pain sensitivity, mandibular function, and psychosocial factors. The results of this study may help determine the clinical value of PRP for myogenous TMD and contribute to future standardization of regenerative treatment protocols in orofacial pain management.

This study is designed to evaluate a method to improve the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS), a common condition that causes muscle pain, tenderness, and reduced movement due to the presence of trigger points in muscles. A commonly used treatment for this condition is the injection of a local anesthetic called lidocaine into these trigger points to relieve pain. However, the pain relief from lidocaine alone may be temporary. In this study, we are investigating whether adding a small amount of sodium bicarbonate to lidocaine can improve its effectiveness. Sodium bicarbonate may reduce the pain during injection and help the anesthetic work faster and possibly last longer. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: One group will receive lidocaine alone. The other group will receive lidocaine mixed with sodium bicarbonate. The injection will be performed once into the painful muscle trigger points under sterile conditions. Pain levels will be assessed using a simple pain scale, and muscle activity will be measured using a non-invasive technique called surface electromyography (sEMG), which records muscle electrical activity. These measurements will be taken before the injection, immediately after, and during follow-up visits. Participants may experience mild discomfort during or after the injection, but all procedures are routinely used in clinical practice. Safety measures will be in place to manage any possible side effects. The goal of this study is to determine whether the combined injection provides better pain relief, improves muscle function, and enhances patient comfort compared to lidocaine alone.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) alone or combined with therapeutic exercises compared with placebo PBM associated with exercises in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Participants will be allocated into three groups: PBM alone, PBM combined with exercises, or placebo PBM combined with exercises. The intervention consists of 12 treatment sessions. Outcomes related to pain intensity, mandibular function, and clinical measures will be assessed over time. The study seeks to investigate whether PBM provides additional benefits in pain reduction and functional improvement in individuals with myofascial TMD.

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if a body test called the NUN biomarker can track changes in chronic low back pain after dry needling and predict who will feel better. This study is for adults with chronic low back pain from muscle pain (Myofacial Pain). The main questions are: * Does the biomarker drop when pain improves? * Can it predict who benefits most? * Do higher starting levels mean better results with real dry needling? Investigators will compare real and fake (sham) dry needling using ultrasound, muscle pressure tests, and pain reports before and after treatment.

The aim of this study will be to investigate the effects of different myofascial release techniques on flexibility, balance, and performance in individuals with hamstring (HT) muscle shortness. A total of 48 participants with hamstring shortness will be randomly assigned into three groups: Group I (Manual Myofascial Release Group), Group II (Graston Group), and Group III (Home Exercise Group).

This Clinical and radiographic study will be designed to evaluate the temporomandibular joint condition post longstanding mouth opening during dental procedure using rubber dam. primary outcome : preoperative and postoperative assessment of interincisal distance , occlusal biting force , visual analogue scale , lateral excursion movement and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondary outcome: investigator will try to answer the question of what is the best duration of time could the dentist use rubber dam isolation in dental procedures without harmful effect on TMJ and its supporting structures?

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of Botulinum toxin type A, magnesium sulfate and saline injections in treatment of the masseter muscle trigger points, in patients between 16 - 50 years old with myofascial pain with masseter muscle trigger points. The main questions it aims to answer are: * which treatment has longer effect of pain release with the least possible side effects and recurrence rate? * Which treatment has greater impact on improving patient's quality of life? Researchers will compare Botulinum toxin type A, magnesium sulfate to a placebo saline injections in treatment of the masseter muscle trigger points Participants will attend to the clinic 4 times * 1st visit will include taking preoperative records and treatment injection * 2nd visit will be follow up and taking records after 1 month * 3rd visit will be follow up and taking records after 3 months * 4th visit will be follow up and taking records after 6 months

To achieve appropriate exposure for an anterior neck surgery (for example an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or ACDF), patients are positioned supine with their neck extended. Due to being in this position, patients frequently complain of posterior neck stiffness and pain postoperatively in addition to the anterior incisional pain. This posterior cervical pain can be classified as myofascial pain. Cervical myofascial pain is thought to be the result of overuse or trauma to the supporting muscles of the neck and shoulders. Trigger point injections are one of the methods used to treat myofascial pain. The trigger point injection procedure is where a physician (typically an anesthesiologist) performs an exam of the patient neck and upper back and finds areas of point tenderness. The physician will then inject a small amount of numbing medication (such as bupivacaine) into the muscle or tissue in that area. Trigger point injections have been shown to be superior to botox injections or dry needling, and equivalent to physical therapy. However, these studies were performed on patients with chronic neck pain. There are no studies evaluating the effectiveness of trigger point injections on post anterior cervical surgery patients. At our institution, trigger point injections with local anesthetic are used as part of a multimodal pain control regimen for post-anterior cervical surgery patients. Our hypothesis is if the addition of trigger point injections to standard of care multi-modal post-operative pain control will decrease patients' myofascial pain, and thereby decrease the amount of narcotic pain medication used.