[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"nutrition-knowledge\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:nutrition-knowledge":47},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,1,0,[8],{"id":9,"slug":4,"hasResults":10,"nctId":11,"briefTitle":12,"officialTitle":12,"acronym":13,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":10,"sex":15,"minAge":16,"maxAge":17,"enrollmentInfo":18,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":21,"phases":22,"briefSummary":24,"conditions":25,"keywords":30,"overallStatus":35,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":36,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":37,"startDateStruct":40,"completionDateStruct":42,"leadSponsor":44,"locationsCount":5},"100643436",false,"NCT07640594","Randomized Evaluation of Voucher Interventions for Value and Effectiveness (REVIVE) in Philippines","REVIVE","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* Households enrolled in the REVIVE study sample drawn from Listahanan 3-eligible low-income households\n* Residency within selected study clusters in the study municipalities\n* Household consent to participate in the study and all survey components\n* Availability of a primary respondent (meal planner or primary food preparer) willing to participate in household interviews\n* For individual dietary assessment components: presence of at least one woman of reproductive age (15-49 years) and\u002For at least one child under five years of age, where applicable\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Households unwilling or unable to provide informed consent\n* Households not residing within the designated study clusters at the time of baseline data collection\n* Inability to complete core survey modules due to communication barriers or other conditions preventing reliable data collection","ALL","0 Months","99 Years",{"count":19,"type":20},5320,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[23],"NA","This study aims to evaluate whether revised food voucher programs, combined with nutrition education sessions, can improve food security, dietary quality, nutrition knowledge, and nutritional outcomes among low-income households in the Philippines. Researchers will compare different monthly voucher amounts-Philippine Peso (PhP) 3,000, PhP 5,000, and PhP 8,000-with a no-voucher control group to determine which approach is most effective.\n\nThe main questions the study aims to answer are:\n\n* Do food vouchers improve household food security, reduce hunger, and improve dietary quality and nutrient intake?\n* Do larger voucher amounts lead to greater improvements in nutrition and health outcomes?\n* Does enhanced nutrition education improve nutrition knowledge and healthy eating practices?\n\nParticipants will:\n\n* Receive either a monthly food voucher or no voucher, depending on study group assignment\n* Attend nutrition education and Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) sessions if assigned to a voucher group\n* Complete household interviews on food consumption, household expenditures, food security, and nutrition knowledge\n* Participate in dietary assessments and anthropometric measurements for women and children under 5 years of age",[26,27,28,29],"Food Insecurity","Undernutrition","Diet Quality","Nutrition Knowledge",[31,32,33,34],"Food Vouchers","Social and Behavior Change Communication","Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial","Philippines","RECRUITING","2026-06-06",{"date":38,"type":39},"2026-06-10","ACTUAL",{"date":41,"type":39},"2026-04-29",{"date":43,"type":20},"2027-03-30",{"name":45,"class":46},"International Food Policy Research Institute","OTHER",""]