Pediatrics

Background: Most adult women with irregular periods of unknown cause report symptoms dating back to early adolescence. This study aims to learn how girls' periods change in the 2 years after their first period. We are also looking at girls who may have a condition called PCOS. This will help researchers learn what healthy puberty looks like and how they can spot signs of hormone problems early on. Objective: To learn how long it takes girls to develop regular menstrual cycles after their first period. Eligibility: Healthy girls ages 8-14 who either (1) haven't had their first period but show signs of puberty, such as breast development and hair in the genital area; or (2) had their first period in the past 6 months Girls at risk for PCOS age 8-14 who have a mom or sister with PCOS Girls with irregular menstrual cycles age 11-17.5 To compare with the girls, we are looking at women \>=18-34 years old with PCOS, Healthy women \>= 18-34 years old without PCOS, and Mothers of pediatric participants age 18-65 Design: Both parents or guardians must allow their daughter to participate. They must attend all study visits with her. Participants will first be screened by phone. Those who qualify will be screened in person. They will have a physical exam. They will give blood and urine samples. They will have an ultrasound of their abdomen. They will fill out questionnaires. They will sit in a BOD POD for 6 minutes: This is an egg- shaped machine that takes body measurements. They have the option to provide DNA samples. Participants will have sets of visits at home or at the clinic about every 6 months. The number of visits in each set will depend on their menstrual cycle. Then they will have a final visit. Visits will include repeats of the screening tests. There are additional parts that participants may choose to be involved in depending on how involved they want to be. At home, participants will collect their urine daily to measure hormones. They will keep a diary of their periods. Adults: Women with known PCOS will complete the same Screening Visit as the girls and will collect dried urine specimens at home for 8 weeks; The Healthy control women group will complete the same Screening Visit as the girls and collect dried urine specimens at home for 2 menstrual cycles; The Mothers of pediatric participants group will complete a Screening Visit (informed consent, urine pregnancy test) and collect vaginal swab specimens at home for 2 menstrual cycles (approx. 8 weeks)....

This prospective observational study will evaluate postoperative pain after outpatient pediatric adenotonsillectomy in adolescents prescribed either acetaminophen with ibuprofen or acetaminophen with oral ketorolac after discharge, based on the prescribing preference of the otolaryngology surgeon. Participants will complete text-message surveys after discharge to assess pain severity, medication administration, and functional recovery for up to 14 days.

Pain is common in children presenting to the emergency department but is frequently undertreated, leading to both short- and long-term consequences. Morphine is the standard treatment for children with moderate to severe acute pain, but its use is associated with serious side effects and caregiver and clinician concerns related to opioid administration. The investigators aim to determine if sub-dissociative ketamine is non-inferior to morphine for treating acute pain and a preferable alternative for treating acute pain in children because of its more favorable side effect profile and potential long-term benefits related to pain-related function, analgesic use/misuse, and mental and behavioral health outcomes.

Pediatric subjects aged 6-17 with biopsy confirmed cancer and imaging findings suspicious for pulmonary metastatic disease scheduled to undergo pulmonary metastasectomy via and open or minimally invasive approach.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of high and ordinary energy density enteral nutrition for improving physical growth and brain cognitive development in infants with congenital heart disease after operation, as well as evaluate the safety of interventions.

This study is designed to help decide how much intravenous (IV) fluid should be given to pediatric trauma patients. No standard currently exists for managing fluids in critically ill pediatric trauma patients, and many fluid strategies are now in practice. For decades, trauma patients got high volumes of IV fluid. Recent studies in adults show that patients actually do better by giving less fluid. The investigators do not know if this is true in children and this study is designed to answer that question and provide guidelines for IV fluid management in children after trauma.

This is a single site, mixed methods, feasibility study of the ViBandz device at a Midwest pediatric tertiary care hospital in a physical and occupational therapy clinic.

The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effect of novel Food is Medicine Programming in the form of medically tailored pre-packaged meals for pediatric patients with Type 1 Diabetes. The provision of medically-tailored meals to children and adolescents with diabetes that have potential food security or access concerns in addition to nutrition counseling will improve clinical outcomes, decrease healthcare utilization, and improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Consulting with a Registered Dietician is the established multidisciplinary standard of care for pediatric patients with diabetes at UMass. Community Servings provides a medically-tailored pre-packaged meal plan designed for pediatric patients with Type 1 Diabetes. The addition of Community Servings to the current standard of care in pediatric patients with potential food security or access concerns will further improve clinical, decrease healthcare utilization, and improve HRQOL outcomes in pediatric patients with Type 1 Diabetes.

The TOP-MAP pilot trial has multiple goals. The first goal of this pilot clinical trial is to find out if it will be possible to carry out a study at multiple pediatric emergency department sites (Peds ED) comparing Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory (NSAID) gel applied to a new ankle or knee injury to NSAIDs taken by mouth in kids aged 6-18. The investigators want to determine if the gel works as well or better at reducing pain than NSAIDs given by mouth. Based on studies done on adults, the investigators know that NSAIDs that are applied directly to an injury work as well at relieving pain as NSAIDs that are taken by mouth. Another goal of this pilot trial is to determine if it is possible to recruit participants to the study, and if the participants complete the questionnaire and take the medications as prescribed on Day 1. The participants will be in the study for 14 days. Participants will be required to take the oral NSAID medication and to apply the topical NSAID gel 3 times a day for the first 3 days after their visit to the ED. The investigators will ask the participants to rate their pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever) before and after they use the medicine. On day 7, the participants will rate their pain, and their activity level. On day 14 participants will do the same.

The overall objective of this study is to improve the standard of care of critically ill pediatric patients. The specific aims are to describe the clinical profile and outcomes of all admissions to Asian pediatric ICUs, determine the risk factors associated with poor outcomes, determine quality indicators for benchmarking ICU performance across sites and develop and train artificial intelligence algorithms to predict mortality, length of ICU stay and resource utilization.

This observational study evaluates growth and endocrine outcomes in pediatric oncology patients who underwent prepubertal HSCT compared to those who did not. The study focuses on final height, pubertal growth spurt, and sex hormone production, with data collected retrospectively and prospectively through standard clinical follow-up.

This study evaluates the inter-observer reliability of a standardized WB-MRI scoring system for CRMO and its consistency with the PedCNO clinical score. It also investigates whether changes in the radiologic score mirror therapeutic response, supporting a more objective clinical-radiological disease assessment.

The study will examine Parent Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) delivered via telehealth (Tele-PCIT) for young children at risk for adverse childhood experiences and/or trauma exposure.

The goal of this trial is to learn if a machine learning (ML) model can help optimize drug therapy in the pediatric population. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are whether a machine learning model predicting receipt of a targeted medication within the next three months: * Increases the offering of pharmacogenetic testing prior to receipt of a targeted medication * Increases the number of patients with pharmacogenetic results prior to receipt of a targeted medication * Increases the number of patients who have alteration in medication choice or dose based on pharmacogenetic results This trial only focuses on the prediction and provision of participants with a high-risk of receiving a medication with a pharmacogenetic indication in the next three months.

The management of respiratory infections accounts for a large proportion of winter activity in paediatric wards. The main pathologies are bronchiolitis, affecting infants under the age of 2. Today, the reference method for diagnosing respiratory pathogen infections is nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA), performed by paramedical staff. However, this technique is invasive and traumatic for paediatric patients. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, salivary sampling was used on a large scale in the paediatric population, and showed good concordance with reference samples, as well as better tolerance/acceptability. The aim of the PreSaP (Paediatric Saliva Sampling) study is to assess the diagnostic capabilities of saliva samples¹ . This will be a monocentric, intra-individual, randomised study involving 502 children using the results of nasopharyngeal aspirates as the gold standard. We will also evaluate the time required to take nasopharyngeal aspirates and saliva samples in order to examine any difficulties associated with the two sampling methods. Although the results of our study report few diagnostic errors, they would justify the use of saliva sampling in routine care to reduce stressful and painful factors, and thus contribute to the well-being of infants and children. Saliva sampling could improve acceptance by the child and those around him, avoiding a less negative experience while guaranteeing a reliable diagnosis of respiratory pathogens. This new technique should also encourage the active involvement of all those involved in care.

Focal epilepsy is associated with widespread alterations in structural brain connectivity, often present at the disease onset and related to learning disabilities. Whether ongoing seizure activity contributes to network pathology is a matter of debate. This study intends to measure the impact of seizures on structural connectivity on a local and on a global level. In children examined with intracerebral electrodes to evaluate whether a surgical cure can be proposed, we combine intracerebral stereotactic electroencephalography (EEG) recordings with diffusion weighted imaging of white matter fibers. On the local level, the study will quantify the number of deficient connections in the seizure onset zone. On a global level, the study will compare the white matter fibers of the left and right hemisphere to probe whether physiological language lateralization is preserved.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether child life services can enhance the experiences of children and caregivers during skin prick testing. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Can child life services alleviate children's pain and enhance procedural compliance? 2. Can child life services reduce caregivers' anxiety and improve their satisfaction? Researchers will compare children who receive child life services with those who receive standard care to determine whether the intervention can optimize procedural experience and overall satisfaction. Participants will receive either child life services or standard care during the skin prick test.

Fasting is a requirement to safely anesthetise patients referred for elective procedure, using the traditional 6/4/2 rule (6h for solid food or formula milk, 4h for breast milk and 2h for clear fluids), applied to all patients regardless of their age or weight. Reducing the aspiration risk however puts young children at higher risk of hypoglycemia due to the immaturity of their endocrine system and absence of metabolic reserves. The Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland recommends that during day case surgery the majority of children may be given fluids without dextrose, provided blood glucose is monitored. Recent statements recommend continuing fluids until 1h before the procedure or even to give fluids when anesthetists sent for the patients. Hypoglycemia is rare in children above 2 years of age. Although the definition of hypoglycemia can differ, a threshold of 3.6mmol/l is often used given the potential neurological harm existing below this value. There is no consensus on the definition of hypoglycemia in children being fasted prior to general anesthesia, nor when nor how to treat it. Measurements are done for complex surgeries or patients deemed at risk according to the anesthetists. An audit was run in 2017 at the " Evelina London Children's Hospital ", Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, identifying 8% of children below 2 years of age as hypoglycemic. Recent review of our Incident Reporting Systems identified 3 cases, in otherwise fit and healthy children, referred for colonoscopy with initial hypoglycemia followed by rebound hypoglycemia after management. There is an urgent need to establish a clear definition of hypoglycemia and investigate risk factors in paediatric patients referred for elective procedures under general anesthesia.

Children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions represent a growing population with complex care needs that span health, education, and social care systems. These children often have multiple diagnoses, rely on medical technologies, and experience prolonged trajectories of illness. Despite this, care remains fragmented, services are poorly integrated, and definitions of "complexity" are variable, inconsistent, and inadequately reflect the lived experience of families and the perspectives of professionals. The CHESS (Complexity in Health, Education, and Social Support) study aims to develop a shared, evidence-informed understanding of "complexity" in the context of CYP with life-limiting conditions. The study will be delivered by a multi-disciplinary, multisectoral research team and is funded by a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Development Grant. This research will provide the foundational work to inform the design and implementation of a future NIHR Programme Grant focused on the development and testing of a child-centred, nationally applicable case mix classification system to support integrated multisector care and resource allocation. This qualitative study involves two stages. Stage 1 consists of semi-structured interviews with (i) CYP aged 5-17 years with a life-limiting condition, (ii) parents/carers (including bereaved parents and parents of children aged under 5 years), and (iii) professionals across healthcare, social care, and education sectors. These interviews aim to elicit stakeholder understandings of "complexity," how it is experienced and enacted in care, and the implications for service access, coordination, and outcomes. Stage 2 comprises a series of stakeholder workshops to review, refine, and synthesise findings from Stage 1 and a parallel realist review. Using consensus methods including the Nominal Group Technique, the workshops will co-develop a cross-sectoral conceptual definition of "complexity" and produce a logic model to guide integrated care delivery for this population. The CHESS study seeks to address a critical evidence gap in how complexity is understood, measured, and supported across systems. By incorporating the voices of children, families, and professionals across sectors, this study will generate new conceptual clarity, build a foundation for improved outcomes, and contribute directly to the national agenda on equity, quality, and integration in paediatric palliative and complex care.

The American Academy of Pediatrics defines high-risk infants as those with preterm birth, special health care needs, family risk factors, and those at risk of early death. Factors such as premature birth, perinatal asphyxia, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), chronic lung disease, seizures, meningitis, hyperbilirubinemia, twin/triplet pregnancy, and intrauterine growth restriction are risk factors that can result in morbidity and mortality in infants. Regular neurological examinations and neuromotor tests are necessary for at-risk infants to identify developmental problems early and to initiate early intervention programs.In developing countries, regular follow-up and early rehabilitation of at-risk infants are not successfully implemented. 5,6 The lengthy test batteries and busy clinics are among the most significant reasons. Therefore, the development and dissemination of shorter, valid, and reliable tests is of great importance. The Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HINE), one of the gold standard methods, consists of 26 items and takes 15-20 minutes to administer.Due to the number of items and the duration, it is not frequently used routinely. In response to this clinical need, the HINE short scale was developed in 2024.The aim of the study is to have a Turkish version of the Abstract-HINE test in Turkey and to study its validity and reliability in high-risk infants.

Aim 1: Compare the effectiveness of focused dose vs extended dose hospital-to-home Transitional Care Interventions (H2H-TCI) on health service use and parent-reported confidence for hospitalized CYSHCN. Aim 2: Compare the effectiveness of focused and extended dose H2H-TCI among vulnerable CYSHCN subgroups. Hypothesis: Both H2H-TCI arms will improve primary outcomes more for CYSHCN with higher versus lower clinical complexity; while extended H2H-TCI will better mitigate racial/ethnic outcome disparities than focused H2H-TCI. Aim 3: Evaluate implementation context, processes, and mechanisms via a multi-phase mixed methods study design.

The aim is to establish a nationwide registry for pediatric intensive care transports in Germany. The project aims to describe and analyse the need for, and current practice of, specialised transports. These data could then be used for future demand planning.

The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of voiding disorders and the related risk factors for the primary school-age children in El Ghrbia Government

Children in resource-limited settings who develop illness at night are often isolated from care, resulting in progression to an emergency. A telemedicine and medication delivery service (TMDS) is a viable healthcare delivery option to bridge the gap in nighttime care. This interrupted time series study (pre/post) will evaluate a digital clinical decision-support (dCDS) tool. The objective is to assess if the tool is associated with an improvement in guideline adherence by TMDS providers.

The ToolCAP study aims to see if using ultrasound to look at the lungs when children have symptoms of a lung infection will safely allow doctors to improve how they treat those infections. The study will also look at if it's possible to improve how doctors decide which children need antibiotics. * Lung infections are the most common reason for children to go to the clinic/hospital. * Doctors usually give an antibiotic to every child with a lung infection. * Lung infections can be caused by 2 different types of germs - bacteria or viruses. * Antibiotics only work against bacteria and not against viruses. Lung infections caused by viruses don't need antibiotics as the body fights them by itself. * Lots of research now shows that only 1 in 4 children with a lung infection actually needs an antibiotic, as the rest only have a viral infection causing the symptoms. * This means that 3 in 4 children get an antibiotic when they don't need it. * Taking too many antibiotics can cause problems for children as it can cause diseases like diabetes or asthma. * Nowadays, due to too many people using too many antibiotics, experts are starting to worry that bacteria are starting to become resistant (stronger than the antibiotic). * Ultrasound of the lungs appears to be a way of safely looking at the lungs to see if there is an infection and may help doctors better decide who needs an antibiotic. This study includes children aged 2 months-12 years who come to the hospital with a lung infection. Children who are very unwell or who have already had 2 days of antibiotic treatment will not be allowed to be in the study.