Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Single-center randomized trial in patients with pacing indication (AV block) after TAVI (transfemoral aortic valve implantation) and LVEF\> 50%, that aims to study the percentage of patients who improve at 12 months in a combined clinical endpoint.

The goal of this randomised clinical trial is to utilise a remote monitoring algorithm to gather essential clinical data, aiming to guide the management of post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) patients and reduce both postprocedural hospital length of stay and readmissions. This strategic integration of technology aims to address gaps identified in previous studies and enhance the effectiveness of post-TAVI patient care. One significant concern after TAVI is the development of heart conduction abnormalities on the ECG and abnormal rhythms, such as heart block, potentially requiring permanent pacemaker insertion. Addressing these rhythm issues is crucial for reducing the overall length of stay. The main question it aims to answer is: Does a remote patient monitoring protocol-driven strategy reduce post-TAVI hospital length of stay and adverse events? Participants post-TAVI procedure and eligible for same-day discharge, as determined by their primary cardiologist, will be randomized upon informed consent into the active arm (remote monitoring) or control group (standard of care). Participants in the active arm will: receive four remote monitoring devices. Receive support from a validated clinical decision-making algorithm for further management. Participants in the control group will: adhere to the best standard of care as per current practice. Researchers will compare the active arm to the control group to see if the remote patient monitoring protocol-driven strategy reduces post-TAVI hospital length of stay and adverse events.

Aortic Stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular pathology, particularly prevalent in advanced age, and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become a crucial treatment option for high-risk patients who are not suitable for surgery. This minimally invasive approach has demonstrated successful clinical outcomes in patients deemed ineligible for surgical procedures. Patient selection criteria and advancements in operative techniques are critical for achieving successful TAVI outcomes. While the transfemoral approach is the most commonly used method, alternative techniques such as transapical, transaxillary, transcarotid, and transaortic approaches are also available. The Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) targets the femoral and accessory obturator nerves, providing analgesia to the anterior hip without causing motor block. The Fascia Iliaca Block (FIB), on the other hand, provides broader analgesic coverage by affecting the lateral femoral cutaneous, obturator, and femoral nerves. This study aims to compare PENG block, FIB, and local infiltration anesthesia in TAVI patients regarding sedation requirements during the procedure and postoperative analgesia management. Additionally, pain scores, motor block presence, opioid consumption, and side effects will be assessed. The study seeks to identify optimal strategies to enhance patient comfort and safety during TAVI procedures.

The aim of this clinical study is to learn more about the effects of TAVR-prosthesis positioning on hemodynamics and the coronary arteries. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does the cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and the echocardiography imaging provide an equivalent alternative to the computer tomography which is the state of the art in evaluating commissural alignment? 2. What effect does the position of the valve on the annular level have, especially its symmetrical and commissural position, on valvular and aortic blood flow characteristics? 3. What is the influence of symmetrical position and the presence of a commissural alignment on the coronary flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

The aim of this registry is to evaluate the overall survival up to 10 years of patients with aortic valve bioprostheses implanted via the transarterial or transapical route. Data from the register is enhanced by matching it with continuous data in the SNDS. Mandated by the French health authorities, this registry must be maintained as part of the management of any patient undergoing transarterial or transapical aortic valve bioprosthesis implantation. Participation in the registry is offered to all subjects eligible for bioprosthesis implantation.

Despite Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) evolution regarding techniques, equipment and experience, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) post-TAVI remains an important drawback. The electrophysiology testing to stratify the risk or necessity of PPI post-TAVI is endorsed by the up-to-date guidelines and consensus documents and it is a valuable cut-off based method. Part of the answer is maybe hidden in the easy and applicable testing of the atrioventricular conduction system through rapid atrial pacing (RAP) with a common temporary pacemaker lead. This trial is designed to investigate the role and value of RAP after TAVI as a predictor of the necessity of new PPI.

The purpose of the current study is to assess complete coronary physiology (FFR, RFR, CFR, IMR, and CT-FFR) in TAVI candidates with intermediate coronary artery stenosis before and 6 months after TAVI. This aims to determine how TAVI affects coronary blood flow and coronary microcirculatory function after longer-term follow-up, and how these effects influence FFR and RFR values. In addition, it is aimed to correlate invasive functional testing (FFR and RFR) with non-invasive CT-FFR before and 6 months after TAVI.

The management of patients with conduction disturbances (CDs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unclear, especially in those with de novo electrocardiographic CDs (ECG-CDs) such as left bundle branch block. In this study, the investigators will evaluate the incidence of retrogradation of infra-Hisian CDs in patients with de novo ECG-CDs and positive electrophysiological study (EPS) 3-7 days following TAVI. In addition, the investigators will evaluate the need for cardiac pacing and the incidence of clinical events in patients with negative EPS performed 3-7 days following TAVI. In this multicenter, longitudinal, prospective study, patients with clinical indication of EP study due to new-onset ECG-CDs after TAVI will be included. A permanent pacemaker will be implanted in patients with positive EPS and a second EPS will be performed in 30-45 days. Additionally, these patients will undergo 4-week continuous monitoring using the ePatch (Philips) long-term Holter recorder, to identify episodes of paroxysmal complete atrioventricular block. Patients with negative EP study will undergo clinical follow-up and continuous monitoring for 4 weeks.

This randomized study compares the effects of conventional (right ventricular pacing in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVEF \< 40 %) versus left bundle branch pacing on left ventricular remodelling in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (\< 50 %) that need permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

This is a single-centre, prospective, observational cohort study focusing on of patients suffering severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) undergoing emergent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). AS patients undergoing emergent TAVI always have complicated clinical situations. Therefore, the aims of the study are to collect the incidence and outcomes of emergent TAVI in patients with severe symptomatic AS, to assess the safety and effectiveness of emergency TAVI system for severe AS, and to describe a more practical evidence of emergency TAVI system in severe AS patients.