[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"health-studies-list:{\"conditionNormalized\":\"undergraduate-health-professional-students\",\"overallStatus\":[\"RECRUITING\",\"AVAILABLE\",\"NOT_YET_RECRUITING\"],\"orderBy\":\"LastUpdateSubmitDate:desc\",\"size\":25,\"offset\":0}":3,"health-study-condition:undergraduate-health-professional-students":83},{"pageToken":4,"total":5,"offset":6,"count":5,"results":7},null,2,0,[8,50],{"id":9,"slug":4,"hasResults":10,"nctId":11,"briefTitle":12,"officialTitle":13,"acronym":4,"eligibilityCriteria":14,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":17,"maxAge":18,"enrollmentInfo":19,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":23,"briefSummary":25,"conditions":26,"keywords":32,"overallStatus":37,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":38,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":39,"startDateStruct":42,"completionDateStruct":44,"leadSponsor":46,"locationsCount":49},"100589169",false,"NCT06950918","Flipped Classroom vs. Flip-Jigsaw in Theoretical Physiotherapy Education","The Role of Flipped Classroom and Flip-Jigsaw in Theoretical Physiotherapy Education: A Comparison of Knowledge, Motivation and Engagement","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n* To be between the ages of 18-25\n* Volunteering to participate in the study\n* Taking the course for the first time\n* Having access to the Internet\n* Compulsory course attendance\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\n* Being a minor student\n* Not being the first undergraduate education\n* To have previously attended courses, seminars, webinars, etc. related to public health\n* Participation in other pedagogical studies during the same academic term.\n* Failure to complete ≥1 assessment (pre-test, post-test, or surveys).",true,"ALL","18 Years","25 Years",{"count":20,"type":21},86,"ESTIMATED","INTERVENTIONAL",[24],"NA","Study Summary:\n\nThis quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test study aims to compare the effects of Flipped Classroom (FC) and Flip-Jigsaw instructional models on theoretical knowledge acquisition, academic motivation, and class engagement among 86 third-year physiotherapy undergraduates enrolled in a theory-based public health course.\n\nPrimary Questions:\n\nHow does the hybrid Flip-Jigsaw model impact learning and motivation outcomes compared to FC alone?\n\nDo FC and Flip-Jigsaw differ in enhancing theoretical knowledge, motivation, and participation?\n\nComparison: Researchers will compare the FC group (pre-class videos + in-class discussions) with the Flip-Jigsaw group (video-based pre-learning + structured peer teaching) to evaluate differences in outcomes.\n\nParticipant Tasks:\n\nAttend lectures and complete pre-\u002Fpost-knowledge tests.\n\nEngage in practical sessions (FC: group discussions; Flip-Jigsaw: peer-led jigsaw activities).\n\nComplete motivation surveys and participation assessments.\n\nSignificance: Addresses the gap in understanding Flip-Jigsaw's efficacy in physiotherapy education, despite prior reports on FC and Jigsaw's individual benefits.",[27,28,29,30,31],"Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation","Educational Technology","Educational Interventions","Students","Undergraduate Health Professional Students",[33,34,35,36],"Flipped Clasroom","Flip-J","Learning Model","Physiotherapy education","RECRUITING","2026-03-25",{"date":40,"type":41},"2026-03-31","ACTUAL",{"date":43,"type":41},"2025-05-10",{"date":45,"type":21},"2026-07-10",{"name":47,"class":48},"Isparta University of Applied Sciences","OTHER",1,{"id":51,"slug":4,"hasResults":10,"nctId":52,"briefTitle":53,"officialTitle":54,"acronym":55,"eligibilityCriteria":56,"healthyVolunteers":15,"sex":16,"minAge":4,"maxAge":4,"enrollmentInfo":57,"targetDuration":4,"studyType":22,"phases":59,"briefSummary":60,"conditions":61,"keywords":66,"overallStatus":73,"whyStopped":4,"lastUpdateSubmitDate":74,"lastUpdatePostDateStruct":75,"startDateStruct":77,"completionDateStruct":79,"leadSponsor":81,"locationsCount":4},"100582368","NCT06862401","Sequential Practicing on Psychomotor Skill Acquisition in Undergraduate Dental Students","Influence of Sequential Practicing for Psychomotor Skill Acquisition of Non-dominant Hand in Undergraduate Dental Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Qualitative Approach","Dentalpractice","Inclusion Criteria:\n\n1. The fourth- to sixth-year undergraduate dental students at a single setting of school\n2. The fifth- and sixth-year students had completed laboratory and lecture courses in operative and fixed dental prosthodontics\n3. The fourth-year students are enrolled in their final laboratory and lecture courses in fixed prosthodontics.\n\nExclusion Criteria:\n\nUndergraduate dental students who have prior experience with onlay preparation in laboratory or clinical settings or those who are unwillingness to adhere to the study protocol.",{"count":58,"type":21},28,[24],"To determine the influence of hand practice sequence on psychomotor skill acquisition in a glass ceramic onlay preparation among undergraduate dental students.",[31,62,63,64,65],"Dental Restorations","Education, Competency-Based","Dental Education and Special Care Dentistry","Dental Prosthesis",[67,68,69,70,71,72],"dominant hand","sequential practice","healthcare","dental education","prosthodontic","competency","NOT_YET_RECRUITING","2025-03-27",{"date":76,"type":41},"2025-04-02",{"date":78,"type":21},"2025-03-31",{"date":80,"type":21},"2025-07-04",{"name":82,"class":48},"Chulalongkorn University",""]