Venous Stasis

6

Review clinical trials related to Venous Stasis. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Early vs. Late Tourniquet Release and Phlebotomy-Induced Hemolysis in the Emergency Department: TOURNI-ED

BACKGROUND: Hemolysis is the most common preanalytical error in emergency department (ED) laboratories, affecting 17-26% of blood samples collected in the ED and leading to test cancellations, repeat venipuncture, delayed diagnoses, and increased healthcare costs. Venous stasis created by tourniquet application during phlebotomy is a recognized contributing factor to hemolysis. While clinical guidelines recommend releasing the tourniquet once blood flow is established, the optimal timing of tourniquet release in relation to tube filling sequence has not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether early release of sphygmomanometer-applied venous stasis (released after the first tube fills) reduces hemolysis rates compared to late release (released after the last tube fills) during routine phlebotomy in ED patients triaged as green or yellow category. DESIGN: Single-center, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. The trial was prospectively registered prior to the enrollment of the first participant. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients (≥18 years) presenting to the emergency department with triage category green (semi-urgent) or yellow (urgent), for whom blood collection is indicated as part of routine clinical care. Patients requiring blood collection from an intravenous catheter, those with known coagulation disorders, and those who decline to participate are excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Group A (Early Release): Sphygmomanometer inflated to 60 mmHg for venous stasis; tourniquet released immediately after the first tube (sodium citrate, blue cap) completes filling. Remaining tubes (SST/gel, yellow cap; K2-EDTA, purple cap) are collected after release. Group B (Late Release): Sphygmomanometer inflated to 60 mmHg; tourniquet maintained throughout all tube filling and released only after the last tube (K2-EDTA, purple cap) completes filling. Tube collection order follows the CLSI H03-A6 standard for both groups. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Hemolysis rate, defined as the proportion of serum separator tube (SST/yellow cap) samples with a Hemolysis Index (HI) ≥ 1+ (corresponding to free hemoglobin ≥50 mg/dL), is assessed by the clinical chemistry laboratory analyzer. The outcome assessor (laboratory technician) is blinded to group assignment. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: (1) Distribution of ordinal hemolysis index categories (-, 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+, 5+) in SST samples; (2) Proportion of hemolyzed samples requiring repeat blood collection; (3) Total blood collection duration (seconds) from sphygmomanometer inflation to last tube filling completion; (4) Complication rate (hematoma, nerve injury, vasovagal reaction, arterial puncture, multiple puncture attempts). SAMPLE SIZE: A total of 792 participants (396 per group) are required based on an assumed hemolysis rate of 12% in the late release group and 6% in the early release group (50% relative risk reduction), α=0.05 (two-tailed), 80% power (Fleiss with pooled variance), plus 10% dropout buffer. RANDOMIZATION: Simple randomization using a computer-generated random number list (randomizer.org). The allocation sequence is maintained by a designated person not involved in enrollment or data collection. Allocation is revealed sequentially at the point of care. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary analysis: Chi-square test comparing hemolysis rates between groups (intention-to-treat population). Secondary analyses: Mann-Whitney U test for ordinal HI distribution; logistic regression for adjusted odds ratio. Bonferroni correction applied to multiple secondary comparisons (adjusted α = 0.017). Per-protocol analysis performed as a sensitivity analysis. Missing data handled using complete case analysis with sensitivity analysis.

Participants needed: 792
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Marmara University Pendik Training and Research HospitalUpdated: Jun 16, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Age 18 years or older [+4]

Blood collection performed via an existing intravenous catheter or central venou... [+7]

Status: Not yet recruiting

The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent Post-Approval Study

This study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm post-market clinical study to evaluate the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent in real-world use.

Participants needed: 150
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: W.L.Gore & AssociatesUpdated: May 14, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Presence of a lesion necessitating treatment with the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Ve... [+8]

Patient is contraindicated for treatment with the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous...

Status: Recruiting

The GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent Iliofemoral Study

This study is a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter, single-arm, clinical study to evaluate the performance, safety and efficacy of the GORE® VIABAHN® FORTEGRA Venous Stent (formerly known as GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent) for treatment of symptomatic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

Participants needed: 165
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: W.L.Gore & AssociatesUpdated: Apr 9, 2026Locations: 27
Eligibility criteria

Patient is at least 18 years of age. [+8]

Patient has DVT in the target areas with symptom onset date greater than 14 days... [+30]

Status: Recruiting

Tissue Repair Gel in Venous Leg Ulcers (US)

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if TR987 0.1% gel + Standard of Care works better than Standard of Care alone to treat Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs). It will also provide additional information about the safety of drug TR987 0.1% gel.

Participants needed: 312
Trial details
Phase: Phase 3Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: TR TherapeuticsUpdated: Feb 12, 2026Locations: 33
Eligibility criteria

Adults 18 years and older [+7]

Target ulcer has been treated with prohibited medications or therapies. [+4]

Status: Recruiting

Non-healing Venous Leg Ulcers Treated With Standard Care With or Without BR-AC

This study examines a patient population with a non-healing, non-infected venous leg ulcer (VLU) having adequate arterial perfusion with confirmed venous reflux. It is hypothesized that weekly applications of the human placental allograft BioREtain® Amnion Chorion (BR-AC) applied to a non-healing VLU will result in a higher proportion of wounds showing complete healing within 12 weeks of initiating therapy, compared to standard care alone. This study has a crossover period, where subjects on standard care alone who do not achieve complete healing within 12 weeks of initiating therapy will be allowed to crossover to receive BR-AC over 12 additional weeks, to evaluate if their wound can achieve complete healing.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: BioStem TechnologiesUpdated: Jan 23, 2026Locations: 23
Eligibility criteria

Patient has signed the informed consent form. [+11]

A target ulcer of non-venous etiologies (e.g., sickle cell anemia, necrobiosis l... [+18]

Status: Recruiting

Tissue Repair Gel in Venous Leg Ulcers in AU/US

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if TR987 0.1% gel + Standard of Care works better than Standard of Care alone to treat Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs). It will also provide additional information about the safety of drug TR987 0.1% gel.

Participants needed: 312
Trial details
Phase: Phase 3Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: TR TherapeuticsUpdated: Apr 2, 2025Locations: 12
Eligibility criteria

Adults 18 years and older [+7]

Target ulcer has been treated with prohibited medications or therapies. [+5]