Clinical trials

Two-centre, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study to examine whether integrating an artificial intelligence virtual assistant (VA), instructed with the latest international guidelines on optimal patient management into the outpatient management of patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the last 6 months, is feasible, acceptable and effective in reducing the need for regular medical assessment and the healthcare burden, reduce variability, and meets with participant satisfaction, without compromising participant safety and overall care quality.

Double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, single-site trial in adults to compare the effect of Manuka honey with standard of care compared to placebo with standard of care on post-tonsillectomy pain and postoperative outcomes. Main aim is to investigate a potential improvement in post-tonsillectomy pain control, with a low cost and freely available alternative to conventional analgesics. Recent systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus suggest a potential role for the inclusion of honey for this purpose. Clinical efficacy over placebo remains to be conclusively demonstrated in robust clinical trials.

The 'Robotic Prostatectomy Artificial Intelligence Low Pressure Pain Study Trial' aims to assess the feasibility of being able to review operative outcomes such as pain when comparing two commonly used surgical devices for the removal of prostate cancers. The data collected will inform methodologies for future, larger, multi-center trials investigating pain in patients undergoing prostate cancer surgery. A robotic prostatectomy is a commonly performed surgery used to treat prostate cancer by removing the prostate gland. In order to perform the procedure, the surgeon must 'inflate' (technical term pneumoperitoneum) the patients abdomen with carbon dioxide gas using a device called an insufflator. Adequate 'inflation' of the abdomen ensures the surgeon can clearly visualise the prostate. Unfortunately, higher pressures of abdominal 'inflation' are a large contributor to intra and post-operative pain in patients having prostatectomies. The type of insufflator device used to maintain inflation pressures in the abdomen are thought to be a variable contributing to differing levels of intra and post-operative pain. Therefore, the purpose of this trial is to compare intra and post-operative pain when using two different insufflator devices when performing robotic prostatectomies. Both insufflators are already commonly used across multiple NHS Trusts. 40 patients awaiting a robotic prostatectomy at the urology department at the Lister hospital, Stevenage, will be randomised to use either the Conventional Insufflator System (CIS) {Stryker PneumoClear Insufflator} or the AIRSEAL® Insufflation System (AIS) to 'inflate' their abdomens during their prostatectomies. Data relating to various intra and post-operative outcomes will be collected in the 30 days following the patient's operation. Outcomes include levels of intra and post-operative pain, medication use, procedure time, recovery room time, length of hospital stay, post operative nausea and vomiting and adverse events. This data can be analysed to identify trends in differences in outcomes between the AIS and CIS insufflators.

The main study aim is the investigate the clinical use of in vivo dosimeters (small measurement devices) for brachytherapy (internal radiotherapy).

Haemodialysis is essential for patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), requiring consistent vascular access through arteriovenous fistulas or grafts. This involves frequent needling, a procedure that is painful and distressing for many patients, causing significant emotional and physical demands on healthcare professionals working in the dialysis units. In the UK, about 30,000 patients receive haemodialysis, involving over 300 needling procedures annually. Healthcare professionals (Registered nurses and healthcare assistants) play a crucial role, with their expertise directly affecting patient outcomes. However, 60% of HCPs (healthcare professionals) report high job-related stress, particularly due to needling demands. Effective needling requires not only technical proficiency but also managing patient pain and anxiety. Strong staff-patient relationships, characterized by empathy and understanding, can enhance the needling experience. Challenges for dialysis unit staff includes the technical difficulty of needling and the emotional burden of patient care. Studies highlight the need for better training and support systems to help them cope with these demands. Understanding healthcare professionals' perspectives can identify areas for improvement, inform training programs, and improve experiences in dialysis units. Research by Rahmah et al. (2018) and Duncanson (2023) emphasizes the importance of HCPs skills and the psychological toll on them, suggesting further exploration of this area is needed. The primary aim of this research is to examine HCPs perspectives on the needling experience in haemodialysis, aiming to identify improvement areas and inform targeted training programs to enhance patient experiences. The study will utilize a qualitative exploratory design with semi-structured interviews to gather in-depth insights from HCPs. Data will be collected from renal dialysis units at East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, involving 12 to 16 registered nurses performing needling procedures. Thematic analysis will be used to analyse interview transcripts and identify key themes related to technical skills, communication barriers, and patient-related factors. The study will run for 10 months.

A study that looks at treating tinnitus and its associated burden, insomnia and quality of life effects with a smartphone app when compared with the talking therapies already offered on the national health service. Three separate questionnaires will be used to collect this data from patients at regular time intervals.

The aim of this pilot randomized study is to examine whether integrating the SIRIO-HF virtual assistant (VA) into the outpatient management of participants recently discharged from hospital with a new diagnosis of heart failure (HF), may reduce the need for regular medical assessment and the healthcare burden, reduce variability in healthcare, and meet with participant satisfaction, without compromising participant safety and overall care quality.

HDF is a dialysis technique which involves diffusion and convection. HDF with high convection volume has consistently shown to improve survival in dialysis patients in number of robust RCTs. The precise reason of this survival benefit remains unclear. The investigators hypothesize that this survival benefit with high volume HDF is related to enhanced middle molecule clearance and hemodynamic stability. However, this relationship has not been studied so far. This observational study is aimed to understand the relationship between HDF convection volume with middle molecules (Beta 2-Microglobulin) clearance during HDF. Exploring the relationship of HDF volume with middle molecules clearance has significant clinical ramifications. Only a minority of patients are able to achieve target convection volume. Understanding these relationships can rationalize the HDF prescription from convection volume-based prescription to β2-Microglobulin clearance-based prescription which may be applicable to wider range of patients. The relationship between pre-dialysis β2-Microglobulin levels and RKF offers the prospect of dispensing with pre- and post-dialysis urea and creatinine measurements and interdialytic urine collections, currently necessary for estimating RKF, thus simplifying its estimation. β2-Microglobulin reduction ratio and its component pre and post-dialysis β2-Microglobulin levels could therefore provide a composite estimate of small and middle molecule clearance and RKF.

Open pragmatic, descriptive single site study in adult patients with non-stenotic eosinophilic oesophagitis. To assess the clinical value of Capsule sponge in the assessment of treatment response in patients with known non-stenosing eosinophilic oesophagitis, as an alternative to gastroscopy in a real world setting. To assess patient preference for Capsule sponge or gastroscopy. All patients with non-stenosing eosinophilic oesophagitis who are reviewed in clinic that have not had reassessment of their oesophagus post treatment initiation or change in treatment will be offered Capsule sponge as an alternative to gastroscopy. A standardised clinical symptom questionnaire will be self-administered for 2w prior to clinic visits and Capsule sponge. Telephone triage for safety check and exclusion criteria by Capsule sponge nurse. A patient symptom questionnaire at the time of procedure by research nurse. A patient satisfaction survey will be delivered after the Capsule sponge procedure by Capsule sponge nurse. Cytological assessment of the Capsule sponge and eosinophil count and other markers of inflammation will be reported by Cyted. Clinic follow up will occur at approximately 6-8 weeks post Capsule sponge. Descriptive Changes in management as a result of the Capsule sponge findings and /or symptoms will be recorded by clinician.

Prior studies have shown that impaired endogenous fibrinolysis is a novel, independent cardiovascular risk factor in patients with myocardial infarction and there is currently no known chronic treatment to enhance endogenous fibrinolysis. To date, no therapies have been able to sufficiently reduce Lp(a) and therefore it was considered to be a non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. New data, however, has shown that PCSK9 inhibitors and inclisiran (medication that you have been deemed eligible for in order to help further reduce your cholesterol levels) to reduce Lp(a) levels by approximately 20-25%. The aim of this study to is to assess: 1. if there is an association between raised Lp(a) level in blood and the effectiveness of endogenous fibrinolysis (lysis time). 2. whether lowering Lp(a) with PCSK9i or inclisiran can enhance endogenous fibrinolysis

Impaired endogenous fibrinolysis is a recently recognised risk factor for thrombotic events in patients with cardiovascular disease. Enhancing endogenous fibrinolysis in such individuals represents a way of reducing thrombosis risk. However, the optimal pharmacotherapy to enhance fibrinolysis is unclear. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of asundexian on endogenous fibrinolysis and compare this to apixaban. If asundexian can enhance endogenous fibrinolysis, this could be used as targeted treatment for patients who despite optimal antithrombotic therapy, demonstrate impaired endogenous fibrinolysis.

This study aims to utilise novel biomarkers assessing thrombosis and thrombolysis (through a blood test), to identify patients undergoing either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) who are at risk of thrombosis, and relate this to clinical thrombotic and thromboembolic adverse events and subclinical valve thrombosis, and identify the timeframe of greatest risk for valve thrombosis.