Clinical trials

This study will compare an intelligent pulmonary function exercise device with usual care and natural recovery in patients recovering from lung cancer surgery. After lung cancer surgery, many patients have reduced lung function, shortness of breath, lower exercise tolerance, and a risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Standard care usually includes postoperative nursing, pain control, coughing and sputum clearance instruction, early mobilization, discharge education, and routine follow-up. However, patients often lack structured guidance, feedback, and monitoring after discharge. Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will use an intelligent pulmonary function exercise device for respiratory training during hospitalization and at home until 30 days after surgery. The prescribed training is two sessions per day, with each session including 30 expiratory training repetitions and 30 inspiratory training repetitions. The device records training completion and related training information and provides reminders and feedback. The other group will receive usual perioperative care, standard discharge education, and natural recovery follow-up without a study-specified respiratory training device or training prescription. The main purpose of the study is to determine whether the intelligent pulmonary function exercise device improves recovery of forced expiratory volume in 1 second, or FEV1, from before surgery to 30 days after surgery. The study will also evaluate lung function at 90 days, symptoms, quality of life, walking capacity, training adherence, and postoperative complications.

This is an exploratory study evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy with fulzerasib sequentially combined with sintilimab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring KRAS G12C mutation. Approximately 30 treatment-naïve patients with stage IB-IIIA (AJCC 8th edition) NSCLC and confirmed KRAS G12C mutation will be enrolled. Eligible subjects will receive 6 weeks of fulzerasib followed by a 2-week washout period, then 3 cycles (q3w) of sintilimab plus investigator's choice of platinum-doublet chemotherapy. An end-of-treatment visit will be performed within 7 days after the last dose of neoadjuvant therapy.

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the intraoperative use of neuromuscular blocking agents and other anesthetic drugs between tubeless spontaneous ventilation anesthesia (TSVA) and conventional endotracheal intubation (ETT) anesthesia in kidney transplantation. The study will also evaluate the safety, stability, and postoperative recovery associated with TSVA. This trial is designed to address the following questions: * Does TSVA reduce the intraoperative requirement for neuromuscular blocking agents and other anesthetic medications? * Does TSVA improve postoperative outcomes in kidney transplant recipients? * How do the intraoperative safety and stability of TSVA compare with those of ETT anesthesia? Researchers will compare anesthetic drug consumption, intraoperative anesthetic performance, and postoperative recovery outcomes between the TSVA and ETT groups to determine whether TSVA can decrease anesthetic drug use and enhance patient recovery. Participants will: * Undergo a complete preoperative assessment * Receive kidney transplantation under TSVA or ETT anesthesia, with relevant intraoperative data recorded * Receive tubeless postoperative management, with documentation of pain scores, complications, and recovery of graft function * Be followed throughout their lifetime after discharge, providing long-term follow-up information

This study aims to evaluate whether resecting the primary tumor can improve the outcomes of treatment with sintilimab and chemotherapy in advanced EGFR/ALK-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group will undergo primary tumor resection followed by sintilimab, pemetrexed, and carboplatin, while the other group will only receive sintilimab, pemetrexed, and carboplatin. The study will assess progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment response, safety, and the impact of treatment on quality of life. Through this study, we hope to determine whether primary tumor resection can provide additional benefits of anti-PD-1 therapy and chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

This study is designed to explore whether resecting the primary lung cancer, followed by osimertinib, can improve outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R). Patients with stage III-IV NSCLC will be included and randomly assigned to receive either surgery to remove the primary lung cancer followed by osimertinib, or osimertinib alone. All patients will continue treatment until disease progression or they need to stop for another reason. The primary outcome being studied is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes include overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse effects (AEs), serious adverse effects (SAEs) and quality of life (QoL). The findings from this study may help determine whether surgery combined with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) provides more benefit than EGFR-TKI alone for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the clinical utility of DeepGEM, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based mutation prediction tool based on histopathological whole-slide images, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study will assess whether DeepGEM can facilitate molecular testing, increase targeted therapy utilization, and improve survival outcomes in a real-world clinical setting. Patients with stage II-IV treatment-naïve NSCLC and qualified pathology slides for DeepGEM analysis will be enrolled. Eligible participants with AI-predicted EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 mutations will be randomized in a 4:1 ratio to either the DeepGEM-informed group (clinicians can access AI results to guide further testing and treatment) or the standard care group (clinicians are blinded to AI results and follow routine care).