Clinical trials

This study is a single-arm, single-center prospective clinical study that will evaluate the clinical feasibility and efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of ovarian cancer, in order to explore the progression-free survival of the study population.

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial aimed at exploring the efficacy evaluation of cadilonilumab immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

The goal of this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of intra-operative dual laparoscopy and neo-rectoscopy (IDLnR) versus conventional laparoscopy (CL) in patients with bowel endometriosis (BE) undergoing surgery. The primary objective is to assess differences in postoperative bowel function improvement at 6 months between the two groups. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a significant difference in postoperative bowel function (primary endpoint) at 6 months postoperatively between IDLnR and CL groups? Do the two groups differ in secondary outcomes, including efficacy indicators (LARS score/cure rate/improvement rate, CRADI-8, Wexner score, GIQLI, EHP-30, VAS pain reduction) and safety indicators (30-day severe complications, antibiotic use intensity, hospital stay \>7 days)? Researchers will randomize BE surgical patients to IDLnR or CL groups, then compare the above primary and secondary endpoints to evaluate IDLnR's clinical value. Participants will undergo either IDLnR or CL surgery for BE lesions, and be followed up to assess bowel function, quality of life, pain, and safety outcomes as specified. This study will fill evidence gaps for IDLnR in BE surgery, support its standardized application, optimize BE treatment strategies, and aim for complete lesion resection, preserved intestinal function, and improved long-term patient quality of life.

This study is a single-arm, open-label, interventional, and exploratory clinical trial,the goal of which is to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of the novel tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (cCTL) injection in combination with immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced gynecologic malignancies.The trial will also explore the preliminary efficacy and immunological characteristics of this therapy in a small sample of patients. 5-20 participants will be enrolled.

The goal of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial is to evaluate whether melatonin supplementation improves glycemic control in pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The main question it aims to answer is: Does melatonin supplementation help with glycemic control, especially in lowering fasting plasma glucose level? Researchers will compare melatonin to a placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no melatonin) to see if melatonin works to improve glycemic control. Participants will: 1. Take melatonin or a placebo every day after randomization until delivery 2. Visit the antenatal clinic once every 1 to 2 weeks for follow-ups

The aim of this study is to develop an AI-assisted decision-making system based on multi-agent large language models and to evaluate its effectiveness and accuracy in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer during pregnancy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug regimen weekly paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, and mirabegron works to treat relapsed ovarian cancer in adults. It will also learn about the safety of the drug regimen. The main questions it aims to answer are: i) Does drug weekly paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, and mirabegron reduce tumor volume? ii) What medical problems do participants have when taking drug weekly paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, and mirabegron? Participants will: i) Take drug paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel every week and pembrolizumab every 21 days with everyday mirabegron ii) Visit the clinic once every 2 months for checkups and tests iii) Keep a diary of their symptoms

This observational study aims to establish a national cohort of patients with hydatidiform mole (molar pregnancy) to investigate its malignant transformation rate and malignant transformation mechanisms, with the goal of developing and promoting precision diagnosis and treatment models across China.

Cervical cancer ranks fourth globally in both incidence and mortality rates, making early diagnosis and treatment of great significance. For early-stage cervical cancer, surgery remains the primary treatment approach. According to the latest NCCN guidelines, patients with Stage IA2 or IB1 cervical cancer confirmed by cone biopsy who meet Concerv or SHAPE criteria no longer require type C/B hysterectomy. Instead, they may undergo type A hysterectomy with reduced surgical margins. However, patients with Stage IB2 or IIA1 tumors measuring 2-4 cm still require radical hysterectomy (type C). Radical hysterectomy carries high risks of postoperative complications and significantly impairs quality of life, including major vascular injury, urinary tract damage and dysfunction, lymphatic complications, and sexual dysfunction. Therefore, there is an imperative need to explore alternative or refined treatment approaches for Stage IB2/IIA1 cervical cancer that ensure survival outcomes while reducing surgical morbidity and improving quality of life. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by scale-reduced surgery may represent a feasible strategy. Both immune escape and angiogenesis are core drivers of tumorigenesis and progression. Combined immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy have demonstrated favorable antitumor efficacy and manageable safety profiles across multiple tumor types. Ivonescimab is a novel humanized tetrameric IgG-scFv bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF. Mechanistically, PD-1 blockade reverses T-cell suppression while VEGF inhibition curbs neovascularization, yielding synergistic therapeutic enhancement. This agent has shown promising efficacy and safety in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and recurrent glioblastoma, though clinical data in cervical cancer remain absent. Therefore, this prospective exploratory study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant Ivonescimab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by type A hysterectomy for stage IB2/IIA1 cervical cancer. The findings may provide novel insights for optimizing treatment paradigms-ensuring survival outcomes while preserving quality of life.

Currently, the survival rate of locally advanced cervical cancer is low, posing a significant challenge in the treatment of cervical cancer. Radical chemoradiotherapy is considered the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. However, 23.3% to 34.4% of patients still experience recurrence or subsequent metastasis. Radical surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but it also has limitations: for approximately 9.8% to 30.6% of patients who do not respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, effective local treatment may be delayed. Additionally, more than 30% of patients still require adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy after surgery, significantly increasing the risk of complications. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore alternative or improved treatment methods for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. An increasing number of women are being diagnosed with cervical cancer during their childbearing years, many of whom have a desire to preserve their fertility. For selected patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer, options include abdominal radical trachelectomy or radical trachelectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, compared to conservative surgeries such as conization or partial cervical resection, radical trachelectomy is associated with less favorable fertility rates and pregnancy outcomes, with significantly higher rates of infertility, miscarriage, and preterm birth. For patients with stage IB3 or IIA1-IIA2 cervical cancer, the current standard surgical approach is radical hysterectomy, which does not preserve fertility. Current research suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can shrink tumor size, decrease lymph node and distant metastases, and reduce the need for postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. This offers hope for young cervical cancer patients who wish to preserve fertility, as it may reduce tumor size, thereby allowing for less extensive fertility-sparing surgery, improving pregnancy outcomes, or even making fertility-sparing surgery a viable option. In recent years, immunotherapy has gradually become a research hotspot in cancer treatment. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, as a type of immunotherapy drug, have demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy and low side effects in clinical trials. Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab is a novel therapeutic biological product targeting both PD-1 and CTLA-4. It is composed of two engineered monoclonal antibodies (anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4) expressed in a fixed ratio and has shown significant efficacy in cervical cancer patients. Therefore, given the urgent need to improve neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer and fertility-preserving neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage cervical cancer patients, this study is being conducted to explore and evaluate the efficacy and safety of Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for cervical cancer. Additionally, the study aims to investigate the relationship between tumor-related biomarkers and the risk of recurrence.

Screening patients who meet the criteria for peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) isolation and cell preparation. Based on the status of cell preparation and mutual agreement between the researcher and the participant, the date of reinfusion (Day 0) is determined. From Day -5 to Day -3, the participant receives a conditioning regimen with cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin. After recovery for two days (Day -2 and Day -1), on Day 0, the participant receives reinfusion of BZE2203 (dose determined according to the dose-escalation requirements). The safety observation period lasts for 28 days, and clinical efficacy is assessed from Day 28 to Day 34. After comprehensive judgment, the second course of cell therapy is selected. Follow-up observations and evaluations are conducted once every three months, with follow-up visits once a year and telephone follow-ups once every two months.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if drug regimen pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and adebrelimab with or without mirabegron works to treat relapsed ovarian cancer in adults. It will also learn about the safety of drug regimen pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and adebrelimab with or without mirabegron. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does drug pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and adebrelimab with or without mirabegron reduce tumor volume? What medical problems do participants have when taking drug pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and adebrelimab with or without mirabegron? Researchers will compare drug regimen pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and adebrelimab with mirabegron to a drug regimen pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and adebrelimab without mirabegron to see which drug regimen works better to treat relapsed ovarian cancer. Participants will: Take drug pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and adebrelimab every 21 days with or without everyday mirabegron Visit the clinic once every 2 months for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms

This study aims to evaluate the clinical feasibility of first-line immunochemotherapy for stage IVB and recurrent cervical cancer guided by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), in order to explore the optimal treatment duration or criteria for discontinuation of first-line immunotherapy in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer or recurrent cervical cancer. To ensure the quality of the study, before the study begins, the research applicant and participants jointly discuss and formulate the research plan. Necessary steps should be taken during the design and implementation stages of the study to ensure that the collected data is accurate, consistent, complete, and credible.

The goal of this exploratory study is to exploring the lymph node metastasis, tumor margin, blood vessels, ureters, and nerve imaging in cervical cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence imaging technology combined with indocyanine green, and establishing an artificial intelligence model for predicting lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer to guide the advancement of refined surgical procedures.And the focus of this study is to investigate the situation of pelvic lymph node metastasis.The sole medication used in this experiment is the fluorescent contrast agent that has been clinically used for over 40 years - Indocyanine Green (ICG).Subsequent pathology results after the surgery will be used as the gold standard to determine the detection rate of lymph node metastasis and the accuracy of the complete resection rate of the surgical margin in cervical cancer.The researchers will also follow up on the quality of life of patients after the surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: can artificial intelligence multimodal fusion prediction models improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer? The researchers compared the AI multimodal fusion prediction model with traditional imaging physician assessments to see if the prediction model could yield more accurate lymph node metastasis determinations. Participants will undergo pelvic MRI after pathologically confirming a diagnosis of cervical cancer, and the results will be used to determine pelvic lymph node metastasis status by the predictive model and the imaging physician, respectively. Subsequent pathology results after surgical lymph node clearance will be used as the gold standard to determine the accuracy of the two preoperative lymph node diagnostic modalities.

The goal of this prospective cohort study is to learn whether artificial intelligence multimodal fusion prediction models are effective in diagnosing pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer. The main question it aims to answer is: can artificial intelligence multimodal fusion prediction models improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer? The researchers compared the AI multimodal fusion prediction model with traditional imaging physician assessments to see if the prediction model could yield more accurate lymph node metastasis determinations. Participants will undergo pelvic MRI after pathologically confirming a diagnosis of cervical cancer, and the results will be used to determine pelvic lymph node metastasis status by the predictive model and the imaging physician, respectively. Subsequent pathology results after surgical lymph node clearance will be used as the gold standard to determine the accuracy of the two preoperative lymph node diagnostic modalities.

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of neovaginoplasty using photoinduced-imine-crosslink hydrogel in patients with MRKH syndrome by comparing the differences in the degree of squamous epithelialization, vaginal length and width, and sexual life quality.

This study is a retrospective exploratory trial conducted at a single center, aiming to develop and validate a preoperative lymphatic metastasis model for cervical cancer using artificial intelligence deep learning. The model is trained using preoperative imaging and postoperative pathological findings of cervical cancer patients, with the goal of enhancing the accuracy of lymphatic metastasis prediction through preoperative imaging and offering insights for treatment decisions.

Locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IB3, IIA2) patients with postoperative risk factors need better treatment. We initiated a clinical study to explore the effectiveness of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by Zimberelimab for these patients.

The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB3, IIA2).

The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB1, IB2, IIA1).